Feds regulate airports but can’t require them to air DHS video


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Airport video refusals

Several airports across the United States, including JFK, LaGuardia, Las Vegas, Seattle, Atlanta, Phoenix and Portland, have declined to play a Department of Homeland Security video featuring Secretary Kristi Noem.

Legal and policy concerns

Airport representatives have cited legal restrictions as a factor in their refusal.

Airport ownership and autonomy

Most airports are operated independently of federal agencies, even when federally owned, and therefore control their own displays.


Full story

Several airports around the country have refused to air a video from the Department of Homeland Security. While the airline hubs are heavily regulated by multiple federal agencies, an expert that Straight Arrow News spoke to breaks down just how they are able to refuse the government’s demand.

The video features Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem blaming Democrats for the ongoing government shutdown, a common theme of the Trump administration in the last few weeks.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Airports refusing

Among the airports refusing to show the video on their monitors are JFK and LaGuardia in New York, as well as airports in Las Vegas, Seattle, Atlanta, Phoenix and Portland.

“We did not consent to playing the video in its current form, as we believe the Hatch Act clearly prohibits use of public assets for political purposes and messaging,” Molly Prescott, aviation communications and media relations manager at the Port of Portland, told Straight Arrow News. “Additionally, Oregon law states no public employee can promote or oppose any political committee, party, or affiliation. We believe consenting to playing this video on Port assets would violate Oregon law.”

The Port of Portland owns and operates the Portland airport, which is a similar arrangement to many of the airports around the country. While the city of New York owns JFK and LaGuardia, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey operates the airports.

Hartsfield-Jackson Airport in Atlanta is owned and operated by the city.

Almost all of the airports refusing to play the video said it was due to the politically charged messaging in that video.

The only airports owned by the federal government are Reagan and Dulles, both of which are in and around Washington, D.C., but they are operated by the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority.

“It’s a cooperation between a federal agency and a municipality or a city where they basically provide air service,” Sheldon Jacobson, a professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign who’s written extensively about Transportation Security Administration (TSA) operations, told Straight Arrow News. “The airports have to, and the airlines have to, abide by the TSA requirements when it comes to security screening. On the other hand, they are independent of them in terms of operating their airports.”

In other words, the airports control what’s on those screens you see, and they can’t be forced to run Noem’s video.

“It’s a voluntary choice,” Jacobson said. “Now, of course, you can bully people to do things. You can threaten them, you can insinuate certain consequences if you don’t, and an airport may decide to run it or not run. It’s really up to the airport if it’s their monitor.”

Other than pressure from the administration, Jacobson said there’s really no good reason to run the video.

“I don’t see the benefit to air travelers and to airport security by running a video of that sort,” Jacobson said. “It doesn’t help security. So once again, it’s one of those head scratchers –– why are we creating an antagonistic environment into where it doesn’t have to be one.”

TSA involvement

As you’ve probably seen at certain airports, the TSA has its own monitors as well that they control at security checkpoints.

A representative for the Detroit Metro Airport told CNBC that Noem’s video is only being shown in TSA-leased areas.

Critics have pointed out that running a politically driven video on a federal agency monitor may violate certain laws, including the Hatch Act.

“Federal agencies are, in theory, politically agnostic,” Jacobson said. “They do their job for a purpose and a mission, as we just talked about. For the TSA, I’m not a lawyer, so I can’t answer that question.”

Spokespeople for airports in Charlotte, Austin and others said the TSA doesn’t have their own monitors at those airports, so the video isn’t being shown.

Noem’s video

When asked to comment about airports refusing to show the video, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sent a statement to Straight Arrow News that echoed similar talking points stated in the video.

“It is TSA’s top priority to ensure that travelers have the most safe, pleasant and efficient airport experience possible,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in the statement. “However, Democrats in Congress refuse to fund the federal government, and because of this, most of our TSA employees are working without pay.”

Roughly 61,000 of the agency’s 64,130 employees are required to work during the shutdown.

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor) and Drew Pittock (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The refusal by several major airports to air a Department of Homeland Security video with partisan messaging highlights ongoing debates about the appropriate use of public spaces for political communication and the legal boundaries on such content.

Public space neutrality

Airport authorities emphasized the importance of keeping public spaces free from political messaging, citing legal and ethical concerns regarding the use of public assets for partisan purposes.

Legal and regulatory restrictions

Airport officials and critics referenced laws such as the Hatch Act and state policies that limit political activity by public employees and on public property, raising questions about the legality of showing the DHS video.

Government communication

The incident brings attention to how federal agencies communicate during politically charged events like a government shutdown and the implications for how official messages are delivered to the public.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Sources

  1. CNBC

Sources

  1. CNBC

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.