Finland charges tanker crew over Baltic cable damage


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Cable damage

Finland indicted the Eagle S captain and two first officers for dragging an anchor over 56+ miles, severing five cables and causing almost $70 million in damage.

Shadow fleet

The Eagle S is suspected of belonging to Russia’s “shadow fleet” and had departed a Russian port; Finland’s president later said it was “definitely” linked to Russia.

Allied response

NATO launched “Baltic Sentry” in January 2025 to protect Baltic Sea cables and pipelines using frigates, patrol aircraft, and naval drones.


Full story

Finland has charged the captain and two first officers of the Eagle S oil tanker with aggravated criminal mischief for allegedly dragging the ship’s anchor for more than 56 miles across the Gulf of Finland in December 2024, damaging five undersea electricity and telecom cables. Prosecutors said the incident caused nearly $70 million in damage and posed a “serious risk” to the country’s energy supply and telecommunications.

The National Prosecution Authority in Helsinki indicted the officers, who were reportedly Georgian and Indian nationals.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Authorities said the Cook Islands-registered vessel likely belongs to a “shadow fleet” that transports Russian oil in violation of sanctions. The ship had left a Russian port shortly before the incident. Finland’s President Alexander Stubb said weeks later that it was “definitely” linked to Moscow.

Eagle S and alleged sabotage

Finnish authorities seized the Eagle S in December 2024. According to a source close to the authorities, the ship was equipped with “spy equipment,” including laptops and devices to monitor NATO ships and aircraft. The source told The Telegraph that the crew likely knew of the surveillance activities but stayed quiet due to threats from Moscow.

The case is one of several incidents damaging Baltic Sea infrastructure since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. In 2023, a Hong Kong-registered container ship ruptured a Baltic gas pipeline, and a Chinese vessel cut two Swedish data cables.

Western intelligence agencies have cautioned that some of the recent damage could be accidental, caused by poorly maintained ships and inexperienced crews.

How has NATO responded to Baltic Sea infrastructure threats?

NATO launched “Baltic Sentry” in January to protect undersea cables and pipelines in the Baltic Sea. The operation includes patrol aircraft, frigates and naval drones.

The alliance’s move follows repeated damage to at least ten undersea cables in the region since 2023. In January, then-German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said NATO is targeting Russia’s shadow fleet with sanctions, and Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs highlighted the challenge of monitoring ships that cross the Baltic daily.

“Let’s face it, we can’t ensure 100% protection, but if we are sending a bold signal then I think that such incidents are going to decrease or even to stop,” Rinkēvičs told reporters.

What are the broader security concerns?

Estonian leaders have called the Eagle S incident part of “Russian hybrid attacks” and a “systemic threat” to the region. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas warned the vessel posed both security and environmental risks, announcing plans for new sanctions against Russia’s shadow fleet.

Pekka Toveri, a former director of Finland’s military intelligence, said prosecuting the Eagle S officers could deter future acts, noting, “The next captain will think when he gets orders to drop an anchor … that it is not in their best interests to do that.”

Finland’s transmission system operator, Fingrid, and cable manufacturer Nexans say they have completed repairs to the damaged Estlink-2 subsea interconnector between Finland and Estonia.

NATO and regional partners are still investigating the incident and bolstering defenses against future threats to critical infrastructure.

Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Damage to critical infrastructure in the Baltic Sea has raised security concerns across the region and highlighted vulnerabilities to both accidental and intentional threats, prompting legal, diplomatic and military responses from Finland and NATO allies.

Critical infrastructure vulnerability

The incident damaged vital electricity and telecom cables, exposing risks to regional energy supply and communications networks that underpin security and daily life.

Hybrid threats and attribution

Officials, including the Finnish president and Estonian leaders, have characterized the incident as a potential example of 'Russian hybrid attacks,' illustrating the challenge of attributing and responding to gray-zone activities.

International and NATO response

Increased military patrols and legal action, such as the prosecution of the ship's officers and new EU sanctions, underscore the international community’s efforts to deter future incidents and protect undersea infrastructure.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 90 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Repair costs for the damaged cables are at least €60 million ($69 to $70 million), according to multiple sources. The affected Estlink 2 cable supplies up to half of Estonia's electricity needs during winter, but services were maintained using alternatives.

Context corner

Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the Baltic Sea has seen multiple cable and pipeline disruptions, causing increased suspicion and security responses among regional governments and NATO allies.

Global impact

The disruption in the Baltic Sea led countries and NATO to strengthen surveillance of undersea infrastructure, reflecting global concerns over the security of critical transnational energy and communication links.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

90 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The captain and two officers of the Eagle S face charges for damaging five undersea cables in the Gulf of Finland by dragging the ship's anchor for more than 56 miles.
  • Prosecutors claim the incident, causing millions in repair costs, posed a significant risk to energy supply and telecommunications.
  • Authorities in Finland launched an investigation after the undersea cables were damaged on Dec. 25, 2024, raising concerns about energy supply and telecommunications risks.
  • The defendants deny the charges and challenge Finland's jurisdiction, while the court will decide on the trial's timing and jurisdiction before hearings start.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Aug. 11, Finland’s national prosecutor’s office filed charges against the captain and first and second officers of the Eagle S oil tanker for aggravated criminal mischief and interference with communications.
  • On Dec. 25, 2024, authorities say damage to submarine cables connecting Finland and Estonia triggered the criminal investigation.
  • The Eagle S dragged its anchor for more than 56 miles, damaging five submarine cables in the Gulf of Finland; evidence suggests possible sabotage.
  • Amid warnings of critical infrastructure risks, authorities said services were held via alternative links; Elisa and Cinia have incurred at least 60 million euros in repair costs.
  • Amid sanctions enforcement, the Eagle S is described as part of Russia’s "shadow fleet," prompting NATO to step up Baltic Sea surveillance, with defendants claiming no jurisdiction.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Finnish authorities have charged the captain and two senior officers of the Eagle S tanker with aggravated criminal mischief and aggravated interference with communications.
  • The charges stem from an incident on Dec. 25, 2024, when the vessel damaged five submarine cables by dragging its anchor.
  • Prosecutors stated that cable owners incurred at least 60 million euros in repair costs due to the damage caused by the vessel.
  • The defendants argue that Finland lacks jurisdiction as the cable damages occurred outside Finnish territorial waters.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.