First lawsuit filed as Florida becomes battleground for redistricting


Summary

Lawsuit filed

Two Florida citizens, backed by Democrats, have filed a lawsuit seeking to halt a GOP-led redistricting effort.

Basis for lawsuit

The plaintiffs argue that Governor Ron DeSantis and the Secretary of State Cory Byrd lacked the authority to change election procedures after the governor’s call for a special session.

Potential House impact

Analysts say redrawing Florida’s map could net Republicans three to five additional U.S. House seats ahead of the 2026 midterms.


Full story

Just days after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed California’s new redistricting map to move forward, two Florida residents have filed a lawsuit aimed at stopping Republicans from reshaping Florida’s congressional districts.

The suit alleges that Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and Secretary of State Cord Byrd exceeded their authority by making election-related changes before the Legislature approved new district maps.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Implications for US House control

DeSantis has called a special legislative session for April 20 to address redistricting – a move analysts say could give Republicans three to five additional seats in the U.S. House if district lines are redrawn. Republicans currently hold a 20-8 advantage in Florida’s congressional delegation.

What Florida law allows

According to Politico, Florida law permits redistricting following the decennial census but does not explicitly address mid-decade redistricting, which has emerged as a flashpoint in several states.

After DeSantis announced the special session, Byrd moved the qualifying period for congressional races from April to June, citing state law that allows changes during a redistricting year. The plaintiffs argue those changes are not valid unless and until the Legislature passes a new map, and that the governor cannot unilaterally declare that redistricting will occur.

“Gov. DeSantis exceeded his constitutional authority by usurping a core legislative responsibility in service of his desire to enact a mid-decade gerrymander,” said Marina Jenkins, executive director of the National Redistricting Foundation. “The Florida constitution is clear, the Legislature is the branch of government that is responsible for redistricting.” 

Democrats have vowed to challenge the effort at every stage.

Broader redistricting fight

DeSantis began advocating for new district lines last summer after Texas moved to redraw its congressional map at the urging of President Donald Trump – a shift expected to benefit Republicans. In December, the Supreme Court declined to block Texas’ new map.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom responded by pushing redistricting to the ballot. Voters approved new maps in November, a move analysts say could give Democrats up to five additional seats and offset gains in Texas.

The Supreme Court later rejected a challenge by California Republicans, ruling the maps reflected partisan considerations rather than racial discrimination – a key distinction, since the Court has said partisan gerrymandering claims are not reviewable in federal court.

What comes next

DeSantis is closely watching a pending Louisiana case before the Supreme Court that could further restrict the use of race in drawing congressional districts. He argues a similar ruling would allow Florida to redraw seats in South Florida with large Black and Hispanic populations. 

The legal fight unfolds against the backdrop of the 2026 midterm elections, where Republicans hold a narrow House majority, and Democrats need a net gain of just three seats to flip control.

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Legal challenges to Florida’s redistricting process could affect the balance of power in Congress and raise broader questions about the roles of state officials and the courts in election law.

Redistricting authority

The lawsuit claims Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis overstepped his constitutional role in initiating redistricting, highlighting debates over whether executive or legislative branches control this key electoral process.

Partisan implications

Redrawing congressional districts in Florida, a state with a Republican majority, could influence which political party controls the U.S. House of Representatives, potentially impacting national policy direction.

Judicial oversight

The courts' involvement, including pending Supreme Court decisions, shapes how states draw districts and addresses whether partisan or racial considerations are permissible under federal and state law.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 25 media outlets

Diverging views

Left-leaning articles emphasize concerns over gerrymandering and disruption to fair elections, suggesting the special session serves partisan objectives. Right-leaning articles focus on the political advantages for Republicans and highlight the procedural nature of the lawsuit without foregrounding fairness concerns.

History lesson

Florida enacted 'Fair Districts' constitutional amendments in 2010 to curb partisan gerrymandering. The last major redistricting occurred post-2020 census. The Florida Supreme Court previously upheld a contested map favored by DeSantis in 2023.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Gov. DeSantis's actions as an "unconstitutional" attempt to "command power," highlighting the National Redistricting Foundation's backing.
  • Media outlets in the center remain procedural, detailing the lawsuit's challenge to specific directives without loaded language.
  • Media outlets on the right portray the effort as "GOP-driven," aiming for "midterms chances," often juxtaposing it with the "California redraw survives SCOTUS" to imply partisan targeting.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

25 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Lawyers for residents in Broward and Miami-Dade counties have filed a petition challenging Governor Ron DeSantis' call for a special session to redraw congressional boundaries in Florida, claiming it disrupts elections and violates the state constitution.
  • The lawsuit, supported by the National Redistricting Foundation, argues that only the Legislature has the power to determine redistricting timelines and procedures, and therefore, DeSantis and Secretary of State Cord Byrd are overstepping their authority.
  • The petition asks the court to declare DeSantis' redistricting proclamation unenforceable if he cannot prove his authority to call a special session.
  • Currently, 20 of Florida's 28 congressional seats are held by Republicans, and redistricting could affect President Donald Trump's strategy to secure more GOP seats nationwide.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Thursday, plaintiffs filed a suit with the Florida Supreme Court saying Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis lacks authority to call a mid‑decade redistricting session and asks the court to void his proclamation or require proof of authority.
  • Last month, DeSantis proclaimed an April special session to redraw districts, but the lawsuit contends reapportionment is a legislative power violating Florida's separation-of-powers.
  • The lawsuit targets Gov. Ron DeSantis and Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd, noting Byrd directed county supervisors to implement rules used only in redistricting years.
  • Redrawing Florida districts could carry big consequences for national GOP efforts tied to President Donald Trump's plan and nationwide redistricting trends that produce a net three-seat advantage for Republicans in the U.S. House.
  • The legal backdrop includes the 2010 Fair Districts amendment approved by more than 60% of voters and a Florida Supreme Court ruling last July upholding a DeSantis-backed map.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Florida voters have filed a lawsuit against Governor Ron DeSantis, challenging his authority to call a special session for redistricting the state's congressional maps.
  • The lawsuit aims to confirm that DeSantis's order is not binding on the legislature, as reported by The Hill.
  • The redistricting effort is anticipated to create new Republican-leaning seats, aiding the party's chances in future elections.
  • This legal action comes ahead of a significant Supreme Court ruling regarding the Voting Rights Act, which may affect redistricting across southern states.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.