Foreign nationals criticized Charlie Kirk. The State Department revoked their visas


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Visas revoked

The State Department said it revoked six foreign nationals’ visas after they made comments about Charlie Kirk’s death.

Screenshots

The department shared screenshots of some of the comments in a series of posts on X.

Medal of Freedom

The department shared the posts the same day President Donald Trump posthumously awarded Kirk the Presidential Medal of Freedom.


Full story

The State Department revoked visas for six foreign nationals after they made comments regarding the slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk. “The United States has no obligation to host foreigners who wish death on Americans,” the State Department said on X.

In a series of posts, officials detailed each person’s comments that led to the revocations, including screenshots. The posts redacted the individuals’ names, but the State Department said they were from Argentina, Brazil, Germany, Mexico, Paraguay and South Africa. 

What comments did they make?

The first post in the thread includes a screenshot of a post that reads, in part, “it’s hot as f—- where this man currently is and it’s deserved.” 

The State Department captioned it “An Argentine national said that Kirk ‘devoted his entire life spreading racist, xenophobic, misogynistic rhetoric’ and deserves to burn in hell. Visa revoked.”

Another post in the thread includes a screenshot of a post that reads, “They’re hurt that the racist rally ended in attempted martyrdom? Charlie Kirk won’t be remembered as a hero.” The State Department again wrote, “Visa revoked.”

The State Department said President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio “will defend our borders, our culture, and our citizens by enforcing our immigration laws.”

“Aliens who take advantage of America’s hospitality while celebrating the assassination of our citizens will be removed,” the department added.

Kirk, who cofounded the youth conservative organization Turning Point USA, was fatally shot Sept. 10 while speaking at Utah Valley University during the first stop of his “American Comeback Tour.”

What led to this?

This is not the first time individuals have faced consequences after sharing posts about Charlie Kirk and his death. 

Just one day after Kirk was killed, reports started coming in of public school teachers, journalists and other individuals facing the loss of jobs or opportunities after celebrating, mocking or justifying Kirk’s death online. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The Department of Defense also suspended military officials over similar posts. 

Late-night host Jimmy Kimmel faced consequences following a monologue in which he commented on Kirk’s death. ABC and its parent company pulled “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” off the air for a week in response to the comments. 

Presidential Medal of Freedom

The State Department’s post was shared the same day Trump posthumously awarded Kirk with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. 

Kirk’s wife, Erica, attended the ceremony at the White House and accepted the award in Kirk’s honor. 

Alan Judd (Content Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The revocation of visas for foreigners commenting on Charlie Kirk's assassination highlights ongoing debates over the limits of free speech, immigration control and the use of government power in response to political violence and its aftermath.

Free speech and legal boundaries

The State Department's action has sparked questions and legal debate about the extent to which noncitizens' speech is protected and whether visa revocation for online comments is consistent with constitutional principles.

Government response to political violence

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, government officials, including President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have prioritized addressing and discouraging approval or celebration of violence against Americans.

Immigration policy and enforcement

The event illustrates the broader tightening of U.S. immigration policies, with increased scrutiny of visa applicants and holders based on social media activity and perceived threats to American safety or values.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 248 media outlets

Community reaction

Civil rights groups and legal advocates have raised concerns about free speech and constitutional rights in response to the visa revocations particularly regarding their application to non-citizens within the United States.

History lesson

Past U.S. administrations have also used visa revocation as a means to address speech or actions deemed threatening though the use in response to online commentary following a high-profile assassination is relatively new and controversial.

Policy impact

The policy signals an expanded use of immigration law as a tool against online speech perceived as hostile or celebratory of violence with possible implications for academic exchange international business and political discourse.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the State Department action as a civil‑liberties story—emphasizing "targeted", "free speech" concerns, and broad vetting of students and protesters.
  • Media outlets in the center favor neutral bureaucratic language .
  • Media outlets on the right frame it as law‑and‑order, highlighting words like "offensive," "assassination," "foreigners," "cheered," and quoting specific posts to justify swift "visa revoked" penalties.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

248 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Trump administration revoked visas for six foreigners who made derogatory remarks about Charlie Kirk's assassination, according to the State Department.
  • President Donald Trump awarded Charlie Kirk the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously, calling him a "great American hero."
  • Vice President JD Vance encouraged people to report offensive online comments regarding Kirk and emphasized the administration's commitment to enforce immigration laws.
  • The administration has increased efforts to expel foreigners linked to unrest, particularly those opposing Israel's military actions, according to federal statements.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The U.S. State Department revoked visas for six foreigners due to remarks made about Charlie Kirk's assassination.
  • The revoked visas included individuals from Argentina, South Africa, Mexico, Brazil, Germany, and Paraguay for making disparaging comments.
  • The State Department emphasized its ongoing efforts to identify and act against foreigners who celebrate violence against Americans.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.