Fox News moves to dismiss Newsom’s high-stakes defamation suit


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Defamation lawsuit

California Gov. Gavin Newsom sued Fox News for $787 million, claiming the network defamed him by saying he lied about a call with President Donald Trump.

A Fox apology

Fox host Jesse Watters apologized on air, but Newsom refused to drop the lawsuit.

Dismissal request

Fox News asked a judge to dismiss the case on First Amendment grounds. The network called the suit a publicity stunt by Newsom.


Full story

Fox News is asking a judge to dismiss a $787 million defamation lawsuit filed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, D, calling the case a “political stunt” intended to boost Newsom’s chances if he runs for president in 2028. Newsom sued the network on June 27 after prime time host Jesse Watters claimed the governor lied about a call with President Donald Trump earlier that month.

The lawsuit

The issue was when — and whether — Newsom and Trump spoke about the immigration enforcement actions that led to demonstrations in the Los Angeles area in June.

Newsom says he had a 16-minute call with Trump on June 7. Trump, however, gave a different timeline, saying at a June 10 press conference that he had spoken with Newsom “a day ago.” Newsom then denied receiving any call or voicemails.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

On his Fox program, Watters showed a call log that he said supported Trump’s claim and questioned Newsom’s denial. Watters accused Newsom of lying when he said Trump had not called him.

In his lawsuit, Newsom sought the same amount Fox paid Dominion Voting Systems to settle a lawsuit over the network’s claims about interference in the 2020 presidential election.

“If Fox News wants to lie to the American people on Donald Trump’s behalf, it should face consequences — just like it did in the Dominion case,” Newsom said in a statement when he filed the suit.

At the time, Newsom’s lawyers said he would drop the suit if Fox retracted Watters’ claim and if both the network and the host issued on-air apologies.

Watters apologized on air in July, saying Newsom “didn’t deceive anybody on purpose” but was “confusing and unclear” with his comments.

Despite Watters’ apology, Newsom did not drop the suit.

Fox’s response

In its response to the lawsuit, Fox News argued that the case should be dismissed and that Newsom should be ordered to pay its legal fees.

“At a minimum,” Fox’s lawyers wrote, “Watters’ query about why Newsom would ‘lie’ is an opinion based on disclosed facts that enjoys full First Amendment protection.”

The lawyers also claimed Newsom was deliberately seeking media attention amid speculation that he might run for president in 2028, and the network ridiculed the governor’s intention to amend the lawsuit.

“With Gov. Newsom facing possible payment of Fox’s attorney fees and political embarrassment, we’re not surprised he has told us he plans to amend his original complaint,” the network said in a statement Thursday. “But no amendment will change that this case is a transparent publicity stunt and a colossal waste of the court’s time and resources.”

Alan Judd (Content Editor), Mathew Grisham (Digital Producer), and Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A legal dispute between California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Fox News highlights ongoing tensions about media accountability and the boundaries of political commentary, involving high-profile figures in a prominent defamation case.

Defamation lawsuits

Litigation between a public figure and a major news outlet raises questions about free speech, press responsibility and the legal limits on accusations in political contexts.

Media accountability

The case centers on whether media organizations should be held responsible for the accuracy of statements made by their hosts.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Timeline

Timeline

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.