French president, first lady sue Candace Owens over ‘campaign of defamation’


Summary

Defamation lawsuit

French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte Macron filed a defamation lawsuit in Delaware against Candace Owens over her claims that Brigitte Macron is a transgender woman.

‘Campaign of defamation’

The 219-page complaint accuses Owens of launching a “campaign of defamation” to grow her media platform, including an eight-part podcast.

22 counts

The lawsuit alleges Owens knowingly spread conspiracy theories to gain attention and make money.


Full story

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife are suing right-wing American podcaster Candace Owens for claiming Brigitte Macron was born male. The French couple says Owens, a political commentator known for sharing controversial opinions, is trying to draw attention to herself through sensational, false claims.

“Ms Owens’ campaign of defamation was plainly designed to harass and cause pain to us and our families and to garner attention and notoriety,” the Macrons said in a statement. “We gave her every opportunity to back away from these claims, but she refused. It is our earnest hope that this lawsuit will set the record straight and end this campaign of defamation once and for all.”

Owens has not publicly responded to the lawsuit. In January, she said that “in order to prove defamation, you have to prove that somebody acted in reckless disregard for the truth, that they knew the truth and they made a decision not to publicize it, instead they wanted to just publicize lies.”

Lawsuit cites March 2024 post

The Macrons filed the lawsuit Wednesday, July 23, in Delaware. It says Owens posted on X in March 2024 that she would risk her professional reputation by saying Brigitte Macron is a man. According to court documents, Owens repeatedly used the comments to boost her independent media platform, raise her public profile and generate wealth. 

The lawsuit outlines 22 counts against Owens, including defamation, false light and defamation by implication.

The 219-page lawsuit says Owens ignored credible sources that debunked her allegation, instead giving a platform to conspiracy theorists and individuals previously found to have published defamatory content.

Claims amplified on podcast, social media

Owens refused to engage with the Macrons to correct the record, according to the lawsuit, instead mocking them and turning the controversy into additional material for her audience. 

When the Macrons sent a retraction demand, the lawsuit says, Owens retaliated by launching an eight-part podcast series titled “Becoming Brigitte,” in which she claimed Brigitte Macron was actually Jean-Michel Trogneux.

The lawsuit says the series included a number of claims that were verifiably false. In addition to claiming Brigitte Macron was born male, Owens alleged she stole another person’s identity and transitioned into her current identity. 

Owens also suggested the Macrons are blood relatives involved in an incestuous relationship, that Emmanuel Macron became France’s leader through a CIA mind-control program and that the couple engaged in fraud and abuse of power to conceal these alleged secrets.

Owens knew the accusations were false at the time she published them, the lawsuit says.

Owens allegedly used the false claims to promote her podcast, “Candace,” after the right-wing publication The Daily Wire cut ties with her over antisemitic statements in 2024. She now has 6.9 million followers on X and 4.47 million subscribers on YouTube, according to the lawsuit. 

A pattern of provocation, the complaint says

The complaint depicts a pattern of inflammatory behavior by Owens, saying she has built her public identity around provocation rather than fact-based reporting. She describes herself as an “independent investigative journalist,” the lawsuit says, but has promoted conspiracy theories on topics ranging from vaccines to the Holocaust. 

Court records say Owens has promoted antisemitic tropes, made false claims about blood libel and minimized the crimes of Nazi doctor Josef Mengele, which she reportedly called “propaganda.”

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

This lawsuit raises questions about the limits of free speech, the legal risks of spreading conspiracy theories and the growing influence of independent media figures.

Defamation and legal recourse

The Macrons' lawsuit underscores the use of legal action as a tool for public figures to address potentially damaging false claims and protect their reputations.

Misinformation and conspiracy theories

According to details cited in the lawsuit, the spread of unverifiable and false claims by a prominent media figure raises concerns about the impact of misinformation and conspiracy theories in digital and social media.

Media responsibility and influence

The situation exemplifies debates over the ethical responsibilities of media commentators with large followings, especially concerning the accuracy and potential societal consequences of their public statements.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 25 media outlets

Context corner

According to several articles, rumors about Brigitte Macron's gender began circulating in France’s far-right and conspiracy circles as early as 2021, later spreading internationally. Such rumors targeting prominent women are part of a broader pattern, with other public figures also having been subjected to similar online conspiracy theories involving gender identity.

Debunking

Legal representatives for the Macrons provided documentation and public records to Owens, reportedly disproving the claims. French courts previously ruled in Brigitte Macron’s favor regarding similar allegations, though an appeal overturned the decision. There is no credible evidence supporting Owens’ or others’ claims about Brigitte Macron’s gender or identity.

History lesson

Brigitte Macron previously pursued legal action in France against conspiracy theorists making similar claims, winning damages in one instance before the ruling was reversed on appeal. The phenomenon of high-profile defamation suits by world leaders is rare, though comparisons have been drawn to actions taken by former U.S. President Donald Trump.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left sharply frames Candace Owens as a “far-right firebrand” engaged in a “relentless and unjustified smear campaign,” emphasizing her pattern of spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories, including Holocaust minimization, thus portraying the lawsuit as a moral imperative to combat dangerous falsehoods.
  • Media outlets in the center employ restrained, factual language, focusing on legal context such as the “actual malice” standard, and detailing Owens’s expanded conspiracy claims — elements de-emphasized on the left.
  • Media outlets on the right adopt a sensational, emotive tone — capitalizing on phrases like “SUED BY Brigitte Macron” in all caps with siren emojis — to energize their audience around Owens’s defiance, while generally downplaying Owens’s extremist associations.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

100 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Brigitte Macron is suing Candace Owens for a "relentless and unjustified smear campaign" that falsely claims she is a man.
  • The complaint, filed in Delaware state court, alleges that Owens spread "demonstrably false" claims through her podcast and social media, causing damage to the Macrons.
  • The Macrons argue that Owens' claims have resulted in a "campaign of global humiliation," turning their lives into "fodder for profit-driven lies."
  • The Macrons seek to hold Owens accountable for her conduct and prevent further damage through this lawsuit, as they have exhausted other avenues for relief.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Wednesday, Emmanuel Macron and his spouse Brigitte initiated a 218-page defamation lawsuit in Delaware targeting right-wing influencer Candace Owens.
  • The suit resulted from Owens repeatedly claiming falsely that Brigitte Macron was born a man and alleging a secret CIA plot installed Emmanuel Macron as president.
  • The lawsuit brings 22 allegations against Owens for defamation and false light, claiming she ignored credible evidence that disproved her statements while continuing to promote her podcast.
  • The Macrons said Owens' campaign harassed them and caused pain to their family, and they seek unspecified compensatory and punitive damages along with a jury trial.
  • The lawsuit implies Owens must prove actual malice under U.S. law, and the Macrons aim to prevent further harm and hold Owens accountable for the ongoing misinformation.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.