FTC alleges Zillow paid Redfin $100 million to suppress competition: Lawsuit


Summary

FTC files suit

The FTC and five state attorneys general are suing Zillow and Redfin for allegedly making an illegal agreement to suppress competition in online rental advertising.

'Unlawful agreement'

The deal reportedly involved Redfin exiting parts of the market and helping Zillow gain an advantage.

Restore competition

Regulators seek to end the agreement and possibly restructure the companies to restore competition.


Full story

The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit Tuesday against real estate companies Zillow and Redfin, claiming the two companies made a deal that the FTC believes violates antitrust laws. According to the agency, the agreement aimed to eliminate competition in the market for online rental advertising on internet listing services.

The FTC alleges Zillow paid Redfin $100 million in February 2025 to suppress competition in the online real estate listing market. Redfin allegedly agreed to terminate contracts with companies advertising on its platform and assist Zillow in acquiring those relationships.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Redfin also reportedly agreed to stay out of a significant segment of the online real estate advertising market for nearly a decade and to display Zillow’s listings, making the site more of a mirror than a competitor. As part of the alleged deal, Redfin laid off hundreds of employees. Redfin is also accused of helping Zillow selectively rehire some of those employees.

The FTC contends the companies disguised the arrangement as a standard business partnership to circumvent fair competition laws.

Impact on renters and the housing market

“Paying off a competitor to stop competing against you is a violation of federal antitrust laws,” Daniel Guarnera, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, said in a statement. “Zillow paid millions of dollars to eliminate Redfin as an independent competitor in an already concentrated advertising market—one that’s critical for renters, property managers, and the health of the overall U.S. housing market.”

Guarnera added that the “unlawful agreement” may limit advertising options for customers, especially within the multifamily rental advertising market and could reduce the quality of online rental platforms due to a lack of competition.

Zillow described the deal as “pro-competitive and pro-consumer,” while a Redfin spokesperson said the company “strongly disagrees with the FTC’s allegations,” according to statements provided to the Associated Press.

The lawsuit seeks to halt the ongoing agreement between the two companies and includes potential remedies such as divestiture of assets and restructuring of their businesses. Five states, including Virginia, Arizona, Connecticut, New York and Washington, have also officially filed a lawsuit against Zillow and Redfin related to antitrust laws.

Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Federal and state lawsuits accuse Zillow and Redfin of violating antitrust laws, raising concerns about competition in the online real estate advertising market and potential impacts on renters and housing market health.

Antitrust regulation

The lawsuit alleges violations of competition laws, drawing attention to regulatory oversight of large online real estate companies and the enforcement of policies meant to ensure fair business practices.

Impact on consumers

Statements from the FTC indicate concerns that reduced competition could limit advertising options and lower the quality of rental platforms, which could negatively affect renters and property managers.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 73 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The FTC alleges Zillow paid Redfin $100 million to secure exclusive multifamily listings, with both companies accounting for a major share—up to 85%—of Internet Listing Services revenue. Critics argue this consolidation could increase costs for property managers and renters.

Context corner

Antitrust concerns over market consolidation have been rising across tech and real estate sectors, with regulators increasingly scrutinizing deals that reduce marketplace competition and potentially limit consumer choice and innovation.

Terms to know

Internet Listing Services (ILS): Online platforms where property managers advertise rental properties. Antitrust laws: Laws preventing monopolistic practices and promoting marketplace competition. Divestiture: Forcing a company to sell parts of its business to restore competition.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Zillow-Redfin deal as a calculated corporate “payoff” designed to “dominate” and “stop competing,” emphasizing the likely negative impact on renters through higher costs and diminished market health, often using emotionally charged language that highlights harm to vulnerable populations.
  • Media outlets in the center remain more neutral, including details like the unanimous FTC vote and stock market reactions, providing regulatory context de-emphasized by both sides.
  • Media outlets on the right adopt a more skeptical tone toward regulatory intervention, repeatedly qualifying FTC claims as “alleged” and presenting Zillow’s narrative of a “pro-competitive and pro-consumer” “partnership” without dwelling on consumer harm, thus signaling distrust of government oversight.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

73 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Federal Trade Commission has filed a lawsuit against Zillow and Redfin for allegedly conspiring to eliminate competition in rental housing listings, violating federal antitrust laws.
  • Zillow allegedly paid Redfin $100 million to stop competing in the multifamily advertising market, according to the FTC.
  • Under the agreement, Redfin is said to have agreed to cease competing and serve exclusively as a syndicator of Zillow listings, claims the FTC.
  • Both Zillow and Redfin dispute the allegations, stating their partnership benefits renters and expands access to rental listings.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Federal Trade Commission sued Zillow and Redfin, accusing them of illegally conspiring to reduce competition in the online multifamily rental listing market.
  • Zillow paid Redfin $100 million as part of an arrangement where Redfin terminated existing advertising contracts and assisted Zillow in acquiring that business, effectively making Redfin's sites identical to Zillow's.
  • The FTC alleges this agreement violates antitrust laws, may reduce incentives for further competition, and could lead to higher prices and fewer choices for multifamily rental advertising customers.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Federal Trade Commission is suing Zillow and Redfin for allegedly entering an illegal deal to suppress competition in online rental advertising, according to the FTC.
  • The lawsuit claims the agreement began in February when Zillow paid Redfin $100 million.
  • The FTC argues that this "unlawful scheme" could reduce competition, leading to higher prices and fewer choices for customers.
  • A spokesperson for Redfin stated that the company "strongly disagrees with the FTC’s allegations" and believes it will prevail in court.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.