Gabbard eliminates Global Trends report, breaking decades-old precedent


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

The announcement

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced that she is eliminating the team that compiles the Global Trends report as well as the 2025 assessment itself.

Accusations

Gabbard accused those compiling the report of supporting a partisan political agenda in their methodology and use of data.

Pushback

Former White House officials have pushed back against Gabbard’s accusations, arguing the move will harm the United States ability to combat national security threats.


Full story

Since the late 1990s, the U.S. intelligence community has published Global Trends, a public report that forecasts global and domestic challenges in the approaching decades. It includes threats like climate change and pandemics while also highlighting migration trends.

However, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced her office is scrapping the team that compiles the findings and the 2025 report itself.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Former officials told The New York Times that some information in the report, specifically the threat of climate change, has become an obstacle to the Trump administration’s agenda and messaging in support of fossil fuels.

Gabbard accuses group of political agenda

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) asserts that the National Intelligence Council’s Strategic Futures Group, which compiles the report, “neglected to fulfill the purpose it was created for” and was compromised because of a partisan political motive. 

“A draft of the 2025 Global Trends report was carefully reviewed by DNI Gabbard’s team and found to violate professional analytic tradecraft standards in an effort to propagate a political agenda that ran counter to all the current president’s national security priorities,” a statement from the office read.

Move comes amid a flurry of other announcements

News of the office’s shuttering last month was overshadowed by a series of other announcements. These include the shutdown of the National Intelligence University, which will be absorbed into the National Defense University, as well as cuts to officers investigating covert operations from foreign governments and threats to upcoming elections.

Gabbard’s team defended the move, accusing researchers of using improper methodology to compile information and analyze intelligence for the assessment. 

Bringing it back may prove difficult

The assessment reportedly requires months of work by intelligence employees working under the previous administration. Historically, the group releases the report in the first months of a new administration. If a future presidential administration wishes to bring the group and report back, it could prove difficult, given the timeframe of installing a new team and compiling vast amounts of data.

Pushback against Gabbard’s claims

Former National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, who worked under former President Joe Biden, denied the Global Trends report ever pursued a political agenda. He said without the assessment, the U.S. may be unprepared for threats like climate change. He also criticized cuts and terminations of U.S. intelligence employees.

“To have the director of national security cast aspersions upon the professionalism and public service of dedicated people, I just find basically offensive and wrong,” Sullivan said, as reported by The Times.

Tags: ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The discontinuation of the U.S. intelligence community's Global Trends report raises questions about politicization within intelligence assessments and how the country approaches major global risks such as climate change and national security.

Politicization of intelligence

Accusations that the Strategic Futures Group allowed political motives to shape its analysis highlight concerns about the objectivity and independence of national security assessments.

National security preparedness

The Global Trends report has informed planning for decades; its elimination could impact the ability of officials to anticipate and respond to long-term security threats.

Climate change and global risks

Disagreements over including climate change in official intelligence reporting reflect broader debates about the recognition and prioritization of non-traditional threats facing the United States.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.