Gun club accuses Fort Devens of ignoring court order


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Gun club wins lawsuit

The Fort Devens Rifle & Pistol Club won a lawsuit in March against U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens over unlawful range access fees.

Accusations of defying court order

In a June 3 letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the club accused Fort Devens officials of defying the court order and infringing the club’s members of their Second Amendment rights.

Allegations of misconduct

The club is also seeking the dismissal of a DOD attorney for alleged misconduct involving a FOIA request.


Full story

A private civilian gun club in Massachusetts wants Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to step in on the ongoing dispute between the club and nearby U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens. The club said military officials there are ignoring judicial orders.

Gun club wins lawsuit over range access fees

The Fort Devens Rifle & Pistol Club, Inc. won its lawsuit against Fort Devens in March. The gun club sued the Army Reserve training forces area for violating several federal codes regarding civilian use of U.S. military gun ranges.

The club said its members were able to use the Fort Devens gun range on a monthly basis through December 2020 “free of charge because defendant waived any possible nominal fees that it could have charged.”

The lawsuit, Fort Devens Rifle & Pistol Club, Inc. v. U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens, stated that fort officials began charging a range access fee of $250 in 2021, in violation of 10 U.S.C. § 7409.

The lawsuit also cited another federal statute that mandates the Army provide logistical support to the Civilian Marksmanship Program. The Fort Devens Rifle & Pistol Club, Inc. is an affiliate organization of the Civilian Marksmanship Program.

After a three-year court battle, the gun club won its judgment against Fort Devens in March 2025.

Club alleges ongoing violations post-judgment

In a letter dated June 3 addressed to Hegseth, gun club treasurer James Gettens asserted that Fort Devens officials are deliberately ignoring the court’s order.

Gettens claims fort officials are now charging non-DOD law enforcement agencies over $140 per range outing for access to portable restroom facilities, despite the fort paying only $2.29 per day per unit. He says these costs are ultimately passed on to taxpayers, even though all range operations, maintenance and personnel are fully funded through congressionally appropriated Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funds.

Call for DOD attorney’s dismissal

The letter further asserts that Department of Defense civilian attorney John Hollis should be dismissed for ongoing misconduct. It alleges that Hollis obstructed the gun club’s January 2021 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, for which the club paid $1,056, yet reportedly received neither the requested documents nor confirmation of payment.

The club has submitted a motion seeking an order of contempt against officials at Fort Devens.

It is unclear if Fort Devens officials have received a copy of the letter.

Straight Arrow News was unable to reach representatives from the military base on Friday evening.

Jordan Mickle (Senior Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

The ongoing dispute between a private gun club and the U.S. Army Garrison Fort Devens over range access and compliance with judicial orders highlights issues of civilian access to military facilities, federal law compliance, and government accountability.

Civilian access

Debates over the extent to which private organizations can utilize military-operated resources raise important questions about public access and the use of federally owned facilities.

Federal compliance

Allegations that military officials are not adhering to federal statutes and court orders stress the importance of maintaining rule of law and consistent enforcement in government operations.

Government accountability

Claims regarding the handling of Freedom of Information Act requests and disputes over fee assessments emphasize the necessity for transparency and responsible conduct by government representatives.