A school shooting in Minneapolis drew swift national coverage, but the narratives diverged among partisan media. Left-leaning outlets focused on gun violence and laws, while right-leaning networks emphasized mental health and cultural issues.
While the majority of news coverage in the days after the shooting focused on the crime itself, the eventual split highlights how media framing can shape public understanding of the same event.
Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™
Point phone camera here
Gun violence
Some coverage from CNN and MSNBC framed the incident as a gun control issue. Commentators pointed to the shooter’s ability to easily purchase multiple firearms, calling it evidence of weak U.S. gun laws. Some anchors highlighted statistics about gun violence among young people, urging lawmakers to act.
“It is far too easy to buy a gun,” MSNBC anchor Jen Psaki said. “It’s the guns, everyone. It’s not really a secret.”
“People who have known mental illness are still able to very easily just go in and get three guns and then use those guns to murder children in a school,” CNN anchor Abby Phillip said.
Minnesota does have an extreme risk law, also known as “red flag” laws. The statute allows someone to petition a court to have an individual’s access to firearms removed if they’re in a state of crisis.
Mental health
Meanwhile, Fox News and Newsmax coverage largely emphasized the shooter’s mental state, tying the tragedy to a broader mental health crisis. Several commentators linked the shooter’s transgender identity to past psychiatric classifications, arguing that the issue was cultural and medical rather than legislative.
“Just a few years ago, the psychiatric community classified transgenderism as a mental illness,” Fox News anchor Jesse Watters said. “When someone has an illness, we should treat it instead of affirm it.”
“Nobody wants to call this out for what it actually is – a mental illness that the left has spent years brainwashing society into thinking is normal,” Newsmax anchor Rob Finnerty said.
Bias by omission and framing
The coverage highlights how media framing shapes public perception. Left-leaning networks downplayed or delayed details about the shooter’s gender identity, while right-leaning programs omitted discussion of how firearms were obtained. Each side presented a narrow explanation — either lax gun laws or untreated mental illness — while leaving out facts that could complicate their argument.
Polarized audiences
Polling underscores just how divided the public remains. A YouGov survey found 51% of Americans agreed school shootings are primarily a mental health problem, not a firearm problem. Forty-one percent disagreed, and 9% were unsure.
The same poll taken after the Uvalde shooting showed a nearly even split on whether stricter gun laws would have prevented it: 41% said yes, 40% said no, and 18% were unsure.
The narrow margins illustrate a nation deeply divided — and a media landscape with no clear consensus on how to cover tragedies like this.
