Harris calls letting Biden decide 2024 run ‘recklessness’ in new book


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

‘Recklessness’

Former Vice President Kamala Harris said in her new book, set for release later this month, that allowing former President Joe Biden to decide on his run for a second term was “recklessness.”

Her view

The former vice president argues that it “should have been more than a personal decision.”

Other comments

Harris also notes that the White House often failed to defend her in the face of criticism from Republicans.


Full story

Former Vice President Kamala Harris says allowing Joe and Jill Biden to decide whether he should run for reelection in 2024 was “recklessness.” Her admission comes in the first excerpt of her forthcoming memoir, “107 Days” — named for the length of her campaign as the Democratic nominee.

‘More than a personal decision’

“It’s Joe and Jill’s decision,” Harris said in the excerpt obtained and published by The Atlantic. “We all said that, like a mantra, as if we’d all been hypnotized. Was it grace or was it recklessness? In retrospect, I think it was recklessness. The stakes were simply too high. This wasn’t a choice that should have been left to an individual’s ego, an individual’s ambition. It should have been more than a personal decision.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Harris pushed back on claims that Biden’s health made him unfit while conceding his age sometimes showed. 

“On his worst day, he was more deeply knowledgeable, more capable of exercising judgment, and far more compassionate than Donald Trump on his best,” the excerpt reads. “But at 81, Joe got tired. That’s when his age showed up in physical and verbal stumbles. I don’t think it’s any surprise that the debate debacle happened right after two back-to-back trips to Europe and a flight to the West Coast for a Hollywood fundraiser.” 

She added, “I don’t believe it was incapacity. If I believed that, I would have said so. As loyal as I am to President Biden, I am more loyal to my country.”

Past tensions and lack of support

Harris says she was reluctant to raise the issue of stepping down because some Biden advisers still remembered their clashes in the 2019 primaries. She also accused the White House of failing to defend her from Republican attacks, particularly the “border czar” label.

According to Harris, aides even field narratives that left her blamed for immigration issues.

“[Biden’s team’s] thinking was zero-sum: If she’s shining, he’s dimmed. None of them grasped that if I did well, he did well. That given the concerns about his age, my visible success as his vice president was vital. It would serve as a testament to his judgment in choosing me and reassurance that if something happened, the country was in good hands,” the memoir reads. “My success was important for him.”

“His team didn’t get it,” she concluded.

The setup

The excerpt from “107 Days” begins with the day Biden announced he would no longer seek reelection — backing Harris to be the Democratic nominee. But she noted he didn’t mention her name until nearly nine minutes into his 11-minute speech.

The published excerpt comes just weeks before the book’s release date of Sept. 23. 

Harris’ memoir offers her most candid reflections yet on her short-lived 2024 run and Biden’s delayed decision to step aside.

Looking ahead

Harris has said she will not run for governor of California this election but has left the door open for a potential presidential run in 2028.

Biden’s team has not commented on the book excerpt.

Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Vice President Kamala Harris's memoir excerpt offers unprecedented insight into internal debates and tensions within the White House during President Joe Biden's reelection decision, with reflections on leadership, succession, and White House dynamics.

Leadership decision-making

The excerpt highlights concerns about how decisions about presidential candidacy should be made and who should be involved, raising questions about leadership responsibility at the highest levels.

Vice presidential role

Harris discusses perceived lack of support and visibility in her vice presidential role, emphasizing how the public perception of the vice president affects confidence in the administration, especially regarding succession.

Succession planning

Reflections on how age and health can influence presidential transitions focus attention on succession planning, signaling its importance for continuity and public trust in government.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 96 media outlets

Community reaction

Some communities, especially Democratic Party insiders and voters, reportedly experienced growing frustration and anxiety over the delayed decision about Biden’s candidacy, expressing concern that the process weakened the party’s chances in 2024.

Context corner

Presidents seeking reelection under questions about age or health is not unprecedented in US history. The decision to defer such choices to individuals rather than party processes has repeatedly drawn criticism regarding risks to party unity and electoral outcomes.

Oppo research

Opponents of the Biden-Harris ticket, including conservative media and Trump’s campaign, seized on Biden’s age and health concerns while also portraying Harris as unqualified, referencing criticism of her roles in border policy and White House staff turnover.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left emphasize Kamala Harris’s sharp critique of Biden’s 2024 reelection bid as “reckless,” underscoring internal party dysfunction, with charged terms like “undermined” and “knocked down” spotlighting perceived betrayals by Biden’s staff, framing the issue as a failure of leadership loyalty.
  • Media outlets in the center tempers partisanship by neutrally attributing “recklessness” as Harris’s term, focusing on procedural concerns and campaign challenges.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight Biden’s cognitive decline and age-related “debate debacle,” using emotionally loaded phrases such as “scorched earth” and “conspiracy” to amplify skepticism and portray chaos within the administration.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

222 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Kamala Harris described leaving President Joe Biden's reelection decision to him as "recklessness" in her new book "107 Days" and acknowledged her failure to advise him against running again.
  • Despite his debate struggles, Harris defended Biden's competence, stating he was more knowledgeable than Donald Trump.
  • Harris criticized Biden's team for failing to support her amid unfair attacks, claiming their actions hurt Biden's public image.
  • The book reveals internal White House tensions, with Harris lamenting that poor communication affected her role and reputation.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • In a memoir excerpt published Wednesday, former Vice President Kamala Harris wrote it was "recklessness" to leave President Joe Biden's 2024 run decision to him alone ahead of the Sept. 23 release of "107 Days" in The Atlantic.
  • Following the debate debacle, Harris notes questions about the then-81-year-old Biden's fitness for reelection, linked to exhaustion after overseas trips and a Hollywood fundraiser.
  • Inside the White House, aides repeated "It's Joe and Jill's decision," and Harris says Biden's staff feared she might upstage him, making her visibility zero-sum.
  • Harris defended Biden as "able to discharge the duties of president" and said she would intervene only if he was truly incapable, emphasizing being "more loyal to my country" than to an individual.
  • Former Vice President Kamala Harris argued Democrats should have pushed Biden more, as his July 2024 withdrawal left her to lead the ticket, and her campaign raised 81 million dollars in a day.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Former Vice President Kamala Harris described President Joe Biden as "tired" during his 2024 campaign and criticized the decision-making process around his reelection bid, stating it was reckless to leave the decision entirely to him.
  • In her upcoming memoir "107 Days," Harris suggests there was no conspiracy to hide Biden's cognitive decline, emphasizing that he was a smart leader capable of fulfilling his presidential duties.
  • Harris expressed frustration over her treatment within the Biden administration and accused his team of fearing her potential to overshadow him.
  • She admitted she stayed silent about her concerns regarding Biden's cognitive health, stating her loyalty to him and that it was a bad idea to leave the decision solely to him.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.