Harvard gives up 175-year-old slave images in settlement with descendant


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

15-year battle

Two 175-year-old daguerreotypes of Renty and Delia, once enslaved in South Carolina, will be transferred from Harvard to the International African American Museum.

Harvard settles lawsuit

Tamara Lanier, a descendant, sued Harvard in 2019 for refusing to release the images or recognize her family’s connection.

Photos rediscovered and displayed

The photos, once used to promote racist theories, were rediscovered in 1976 and displayed without consent.


Full story

Two rare 19th-century photographs of enslaved individuals are heading to a South Carolina museum after Harvard University agreed to release them, bringing an end to a 15-year dispute. A descendant of the individuals in the photographs led the fight to have them released, seeking justice for her ancestors and greater recognition of their story.

What are the photos? 

Harvard’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology currently holds photographs of Renty and his daughter Delia, ancestors of Tamara Lanier. According to Lanier and her attorney, the pictures were taken in South Carolina, where they were slaves in 1850. 

They are known as daguerreotypes, an early form of photography created on a silver-coated copper plate. The photography was popular in the mid-1800s for its exceptional detail and durability. The images were expensive, meaning most pictures involved wealthier subjects.

What led to the settlement? 

Lanier filed the lawsuit against Harvard in 2019, accusing the university of refusing to release the photographs, acknowledge her family’s connection to the people depicted or take responsibility for its historical ties to slavery.

In 2022, Massachusetts’ highest court allowed Lanier’s case against Harvard to proceed. The court acknowledged the university’s role in the origins of the daguerreotypes and emphasized that its current responsibilities are inseparable from its historical involvement in slavery.

Under the settlement between Lanier and Harvard, the university will transfer the 175-year-old photographs to the International African American Museum in South Carolina, along with other images depicting five other enslaved individuals. 

Harvard professor Louis Agassiz used the images to support his now-discredited theories about racial hierarchy and slavery in America. However, Lanier’s attorney argues that staff rediscovered the photographs in 1976 and later displayed them at the Peabody Museum without trying to identify or contact any living descendants. He claims Harvard used the images to generate public interest and profit through image use rights.

“Since Black Americans were first brought to this country in chains, our pain and trauma have been exploited for capitalistic gain,” Lanier said. “Harvard played a role in the darkest chapter in American history. This is a small step in the right direction towards fully acknowledging that history and working to rectify it.”

“This is a day of reckoning 175 years in the making. The survival and perseverance of Renty and Delia in their lifetime won them their freedom after emancipation, so it seems only fitting that Tamara Lanier’s perseverance in telling their full story has now won them their freedom from spiritual enslavement by the institution that has held them for nearly two centuries,” Lanier’s attorney, Joshua Koskoff, said.

What was the response from Harvard?

According to a Harvard spokesperson, the settlement advances their goal of placing the photos in another museum or public institution. 

“While we are grateful to Ms. Lanier for sparking important conversations about these images, this was a complex situation, particularly since Harvard has not confirmed that Ms. Lanier was related to the individuals in the daguerreotypes,” Harvard told The Associated Press. 

In 2022, Harvard released a report from the Presidential Committee on Harvard and the Legacy of Slavery, which acknowledged that slavery is what built the university to its glory. The report states that Harvard’s faculty, staff and leadership enslaved more than 70 people.

Harvard’s involvement with slavery didn’t end when Massachusetts outlawed it in 1783. In the 19th century, the university accepted financial support from donors whose wealth originated from slavery, including profits tied to Southern cotton and Caribbean sugar. 

In the 20th century, some Harvard faculty promoted eugenics, while racial bias shaped admissions policies and student housing. These practices helped build Harvard’s reputation as an elite institution serving America’s white upper class. 

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

Lanier’s story highlights the struggle to confront institutional ties to slavery, restore historical justice and ensure stories of those once silenced are preserved.

Historical accountability

The decision highlights how institutions like Harvard are being pressed to acknowledge and address their historical connections to slavery and the exploitation of enslaved individuals, as indicated by Harvard's own report admitting its foundational ties to slavery.

Descendant rights

The story centers on Tamara Lanier's pursuit of justice for her ancestors and raises broader questions about the rights of descendants to reclaim cultural and historical artifacts, as well as to shape the narrative of their forebears.

Museum stewardship

The return of the photographs underscores ongoing discussions about the appropriate stewardship and public display of historically significant and sensitive materials relating to marginalized communities.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 52 media outlets

Context corner

The images were originally commissioned by Harvard professor Louis Agassiz as pseudo-scientific evidence for racist theories, reflecting 19th-century academic complicity in slavery and racial hierarchy. For decades, these images were stored and largely forgotten until rediscovered in the 1970s, then later became a focal point for discussions about institutional responsibility and reparative justice.

Debunking

Claims have circulated regarding Harvard's profit from image licensing. According to Harvard’s statements in several articles, the university denies substantial profits, asserting imposed fees were “nominal” and for licensing access. However, Lanier’s legal team contends Harvard capitalized on the images, a claim corroborated by coverage of licensing fees cited in legal documents.

Policy impact

The settlement may prompt universities and museums to reassess their stewardship policies for artifacts with traumatic or exploitative origins. Institutions might face increasing pressure to return items to descendants or appropriate community organizations, influencing legal and ethical standards for collections and cultural heritage preservation.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the settlement as a hard-won victory against institutional exploitation and moral failure, using emotionally charged language like "unprecedented victory," "exploitation," and labeling Harvard a "conflicted player" that has yet to reckon with its role in slavery.
  • Media outlets in the center de-emphasize these tensions by highlighting Harvard’s gratitude toward Lanier, thereby softening institutional culpability.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize the legal and procedural dimensions, praising Tamara Lanier’s "bravery" and "tenacity" but avoiding strongly moralistic critique, often portraying Harvard as a reluctant party compelled by the lawsuit rather than active wrongdoing.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

67 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Harvard University will relinquish 175-year-old photographs of enslaved individuals to a South Carolina museum as part of a settlement with Tamara Lanier, a descendant of one of the subjects.
  • The transfer ends a 15-year legal battle initiated by Lanier regarding the images, which Harvard had used and licensed without her approval.
  • Dr. Tonya M. Matthews, CEO of the International African American Museum, stated that this moment is "175 years in the making," honoring Lanier's efforts.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Harvard University will relinquish 175-year-old photographs believed to be the earliest taken of enslaved people to a South Carolina museum as part of a settlement with a descendant.
  • The settlement concludes a 15-year battle that began with a descendant advocating for the release of the daguerreotypes.
  • The Massachusetts Supreme Court supported the case, affirming that "Harvard’s present obligations cannot be divorced from its past abuses."
  • Dr. Tonya M. Matthews called the relinquishing of the images a moment "175 years in the making," highlighting its historical significance.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Harvard University will transfer 175-year-old photographs of enslaved individuals to a South Carolina museum as part of a settlement with Tamara Lanier, a descendant of one of the subjects, ending a 15-year legal battle over the images.
  • Lanier's lawsuit, which began in 2019, accused Harvard of wrongful seizure and exploiting the images by charging for their reproduction.
  • The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled in favor of Lanier, recognizing Harvard's complicity in the horrific actions surrounding the creation of the daguerreotypes.
  • Tonya M. Matthews, CEO of the International African American Museum, praised the settlement as a moment 175 years in the making and highlighted Lanier's bravery throughout the process.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™