Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sexual assault in partial retrial verdict


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Retrial verdict

A Manhattan jury convicted Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault.

Jury deliberation tension

Tensions mounted as jurors struggled to reach a verdict, with reports of shouting, threats. Weinstein also requested a mistrial — ultimately denied by the judge.

Weinstein's regrets

In a phone interview, Weinstein expressed remorse for his actions, stating he regrets the impact on his family and friends but maintains his conduct was never criminal.


Full story

A Manhattan jury has convicted former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein on a top charge in his sex crimes retrial. Weinstein was previously convicted of third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act. Each first-degree criminal sexual act carries a maximum sentence of 25 years.

BBC reports that Weinstein was found guilty of sexual assault but not guilty of an additional sexual assault charge. However, the jury has not yet reached a decision on a rape charge.

The jury consists of seven women and five men. According to the Associated Press, they were handed the case on the morning of Thursday, June 5, and deliberated without reaching a decision. Deliberations continued the next morning and carried into the following week.

Testimony from key witnesses

NBC News reports that jurors heard testimony from several people, including “Project Runway” production assistant Miriam Haley and actress Jessica Mann, both of whom testified during Weinstein’s 2020 trial.

One woman who did not testify in 2020 but spoke during this retrial was a former runway model from Poland.

During the retrial, Weinstein was held at Manhattan’s Bellevue Hospital, where a court approved his stay. His recent health issues included emergency heart surgery last September and a chronic myeloid leukemia diagnosis in October.

Despite his medical problems, Weinstein appeared in court Wednesday in a wheelchair.

Defense requests mistrial

Fox News reports that Weinstein’s defense team requested another mistrial. Weinstein addressed Judge Curtis Farber, saying, “This is my life that’s on the line, this is not fair.” Farber denied the request.

Jury room tensions 

Deadline reports chaotic moments during deliberations, including an alleged threat of violence between jurors.

One juror told Farber on Wednesday, “I can’t go back in there with the other jurors,” describing yelling and screaming among the group during the five-day deliberations.

Weinstein’s personal regrets

In a phone call last week with Fox 5 New York’s Rosanna Scotto, Weinstein admitted to feeling nervous as the jury deliberated.

“I have regrets that I — from my family — through this, that I put my wife through this, that I acted immorally,” he said. “I put so many friends through this and hurt people that were close to me by actions that were stupid. But never illegal, never criminal, never anything.”

Weinstein’s retrial came after his 2020 conviction for rape and predatory assault was overturned. A trial judge ruled that women were wrongly allowed to testify about allegations not included in his criminal charges.

However, NBC News reports Weinstein will likely be returned to California after this retrial to serve a 16-year sentence for his 2022 rape conviction.

#MeToo movement and Weinstein’s downfall

In 2017, Weinstein was accused of sexual misconduct by multiple women, helping to ignite the #MeToo movement. He was forced out of his production company, The Weinstein Company, which later filed for bankruptcy in 2018.

Zachary Hill (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The conviction of Harvey Weinstein in his sex crimes retrial represents a pivotal development in the ongoing legal proceedings against a figure whose alleged actions played a central role in catalyzing the #MeToo movement and broader conversations about sexual misconduct in positions of power.

Legal accountability

Weinstein's conviction demonstrates that high-profile individuals can face significant legal consequences for allegations of sexual assault, regardless of their former status or influence.

#MeToo movement

The proceedings against Weinstein are closely tied to the #MeToo movement, which gained prominence following initial accusations against him and marked a widespread cultural shift toward addressing sexual misconduct.

Jury deliberations and legal process

The tense and extended jury deliberations, along with defense appeals for mistrial, highlight the complexities and challenges inherent in high-profile criminal trials involving accusations of sexual misconduct.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 141 media outlets

Do the math

Weinstein faces up to 25 years in prison for a first-degree criminal sexual act. The jury deliberated for five days. Weinstein, already serving a 16-year sentence in California, could receive an additional sentence in New York, pending the unresolved charge. More than 100 women have publicly accused him of sexual misconduct.

Oppo research

Weinstein’s defense team and supporters argue the retrial is unfair, citing alleged jury bias, media influence, and procedural issues. According to spokespersons and defense lawyers, they intend to continue filing appeals and claim that external factors, such as public perception and #MeToo activism, compromise Weinstein’s right to a fair trial.

Quote bank

"Testifying in the face of constant disruptions, victim-shaming and deliberate attempts to distort the truth was exhausting and at times dehumanizing," said accuser Miriam Haley. Weinstein, after the verdict, stated, “My life is on the line, and you know what? It’s not fair.” Defense attorney Arthur Aidala asked, “If this guy wasn’t Harvey Weinstein, would we even be here?”

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Weinstein’s retrial through a lens emphasizing his repeated guilt and predatory abuse of power, highlighting emotionally charged terms like “serial predator” and connecting the verdict to the landmark #MeToo movement’s pursuit of justice, thus conveying a tone of moral reckoning and victim advocacy.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right employ skeptical and defensive rhetoric, spotlighting jury discord with words like “squabbling” and framing encounters as “transactional” and possibly consensual, often casting doubt on prosecutorial motives and portraying Weinstein as a figure enduring a perceived vendetta.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

334 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Harvey Weinstein was found guilty by a jury of one count of criminal sexual assault against Miriam Haley and not guilty of another count against Kaja Sokola.
  • The jury has not reached a verdict on the charge of rape related to Jessica Mann, highlighting the case's unresolved aspects.
  • The retrial was prompted by an appeals court overturning Weinstein's previous conviction in April 2024 due to improper rulings in that trial.
  • Weinstein continues to deny all allegations of non-consensual sexual acts and claims that his interactions with the women were consensual.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Harvey Weinstein was found guilty of forcibly subjecting one woman to a criminal sex act in 2006, according to a Manhattan jury on June 11, 2025.
  • The jury acquitted Weinstein of another charge involving Kaja Sokola. The jury did not reach a unanimous verdict on an additional rape charge.
  • Prosecutors claimed Weinstein used his power to manipulate aspiring actresses for sexual acts, while the defense argued the encounters were consensual.
  • The retrial followed the 2020 conviction being overturned, as Weinstein remains imprisoned due to a 16-year sentence for a separate conviction in California.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

  • A grand jury indicts Harvey Weinstein on new criminal charges in New York after his 2020 conviction was overturned.
    Reuters
    U.S.
    Sep 12

    Harvey Weinstein faces new criminal charges in New York

    Disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, who became the face of the #MeToo movement for sex crimes in 2017, is now facing new criminal charges in New York. The new indictment comes after New York’s highest court threw out Weinstein’s 2020 conviction for criminal sexual assault and third-degree rape, citing unfair testimony allowances by the trial…

Timeline

  • A grand jury indicts Harvey Weinstein on new criminal charges in New York after his 2020 conviction was overturned.
    Reuters
    U.S.
    Sep 12

    Harvey Weinstein faces new criminal charges in New York

    Disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, who became the face of the #MeToo movement for sex crimes in 2017, is now facing new criminal charges in New York. The new indictment comes after New York’s highest court threw out Weinstein’s 2020 conviction for criminal sexual assault and third-degree rape, citing unfair testimony allowances by the trial…