Harvey Weinstein retrial ends in mistrial, jury foreperson won’t deliberate


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Mistrial on one charge

Harvey Weinstein’s retrial ended in a mistrial of one charge after a juror allegedly threatened the foreman, leading the judge to halt deliberations on the final rape charge.

Guilty on two charges

Weinstein was convicted on two other charges earlier in the week — third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act — but jurors could not agree on the count involving actress Jessica Mann.

Status date set

The judge set a July 2 status hearing to determine whether Weinstein will face a third trial, while he remains expected to return to California to serve a 16-year sentence from a 2022 conviction.


Full story

A Manhattan judge has declared a mistrial in Harvey Weinstein’s sex crimes retrial. The decision came one day after the jury returned a partial verdict on two of three charges.

The jury had been deliberating since last week but only decided on third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act on Wednesday, June 11. The mistrial will not affect the verdicts that the jury had reached.

The remaining count, involving former actress Jessica Mann, became the focus of mounting tension among jurors.

Threat inside the jury room

According to multiple outlets, a juror told the judge on Wednesday that they could not return to the deliberation room due to yelling and threats from another panelist. The situation escalated to the point where one juror allegedly told the foreman, “You know me; you going to see me outside,” according to NBC News.

This confrontation put an end to the retrial.

On Thursday, June 12, Judge Curtis Farber declared a mistrial after the jury foreman said he was no longer willing to continue deliberating. The assistant district attorney immediately requested a new trial on the remaining charge.

Jessica Mann, who testified during the retrial, was at the center of the unresolved count of sexual assault. NBC reports that one juror told reporters outside the courthouse that her case was the most difficult to agree on.

“I will never give up on myself and making sure my voice — and the truth — is heard. I have told the District Attorney I am ready, willing and able to endure this as many times as it takes for justice and accountability to be served. Today is not the end of my fight,” Mann stated in a statement to NBC.

Next steps for the case

Weinstein’s defense attorney argued that a third trial is unnecessary, telling NBC News that his client has already endured enough legal proceedings.

The judge has scheduled a status hearing for July 2 to determine if the retrial will proceed, according to The New York Times.

Defense requested mistrial Wednesday

Fox News reported that Weinstein’s defense team requested a mistrial on Wednesday. Weinstein addressed Judge Curtis Farber, saying, “This is my life that’s on the line, this is not fair.” Farber denied the request.

Authorities have held Weinstein at Manhattan’s Bellevue Hospital, where a court approved his stay. He recently underwent emergency heart surgery last September and had a chronic myeloid leukemia diagnosis in October.

Despite his medical problems, Weinstein appeared in court in a wheelchair.

Weinstein expressed regrets

In a phone on June 5, with Fox 5 New York’s Rosanna Scotto, Weinstein addressed the proceedings.

“I have regrets that I — from my family — through this, that I put my wife through this, that I acted immorally,” Weinstein said. “I put so many friends through this and hurt people that were close to me by actions that were stupid. But never illegal, never criminal, never anything.”

Weinstein’s retrial came after his 2020 conviction for rape and predatory assault was overturned. A trial judge ruled that women were wrongly allowed to testify about allegations not included in his criminal charges.

NBC reported Weinstein will likely be returned to California to serve a 16-year sentence for his 2022 rape conviction.

Harry Fogle (Video Editor) and Matt Bishop (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The mistrial in Harvey Weinstein’s retrial highlights ongoing challenges in high-profile sexual assault cases, including jury dynamics and the pursuit of accountability for alleged crimes.

Jury deliberations

Jury tensions and allegations of threats inside the deliberation room, as reported by multiple outlets and NBC News, underscore the challenges and pressures jurors face in complex legal cases.

Sexual assault accountability

The inability to reach verdicts on all charges and the statements from Jessica Mann and prosecutors illustrate the ongoing efforts to pursue justice and accountability in cases of alleged sexual assault.

Impact of retrials

Weinstein’s defense and the uncertain future of further legal proceedings highlight broader debates about the necessity, fairness, and emotional toll of repeated retrials in high-profile criminal cases.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 67 media outlets

Community reaction

Community responses include strong support for the women who testified, with several expressing gratitude for their courage. According to district attorneys and advocates, the verdict is seen as validation for survivors, though some legal experts and defense representatives remain critical of the jury's process and the climate surrounding high-profile sexual assault cases.

Context corner

Harvey Weinstein's legal battles have occurred against the backdrop of the #MeToo movement, which gained momentum in 2017 following public allegations against him and others in positions of power. The 2020 conviction, later overturned on appeal, was widely seen as a landmark event shaping public understanding of workplace harassment and abuse by influential figures.

Policy impact

The retrial and its outcome continue to shape how courts handle testimony from accusers not directly connected to criminal charges, influencing prosecutorial strategies and jury instructions in sexual misconduct cases. Legal analysts note that the process highlights ongoing debates over fair trial standards in high-profile cases and the rights of both accusers and defendants.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Weinstein mistrial through a lens emphasizing victim-centered concerns, highlighting the “rape charge” and portraying the jury foreperson’s refusal to deliberate as intimidation and an indication of unfair prejudice against Weinstein — terms like “feared for his safety” reveal this protective, empathetic tone.
  • Media outlets in the center de-emphasize emotive language, focusing on “jury chaos” and “contentious” deliberations without partisan coloring.
  • Media outlets on the right stress courtroom dysfunction and personal accountability, using charged phrases like “playground bullying” and “Miramax pervert” to underscore juror immaturity and Weinstein’s notoriety, framing the case as a critical moment for #MeToo justice while also spotlighting accuser Jessica Mann’s complex post-assault relationship.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

78 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The judge declared a mistrial on Harvey Weinstein's remaining rape charge due to the jury foreperson's refusal to continue deliberations after facing alleged threats from another juror.
  • The jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict on the charge of third-degree rape involving Jessica Mann.
  • Weinstein has been convicted of a criminal sexual act against Miriam Haley but was acquitted of sexually assaulting Kaja Sokola.
  • Prosecutors plan to retry Weinstein on the rape charge, as Mann is ready and willing to proceed with the retrial.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A judge declared a mistrial on Thursday in Harvey Weinstein's New York retrial when the jury foreperson chose not to resume deliberations.
  • The mistrial followed a partial verdict delivered Wednesday, which convicted Weinstein of one criminal sexual act and acquitted him of another from 2006 accusations.
  • The jury remained deadlocked on a third charge, a 2013 third-degree rape accusation, amid rising tensions and bullying claims within the 12-person panel.
  • The jury foreperson reported feeling threatened and pressured by other jurors, stating, "I feel afraid inside there," and refused further deliberations.
  • Prosecutors said they will retry Weinstein on the unresolved rape count, while Weinstein denies all charges and his prior 2020 conviction was overturned in 2024.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Harvey Weinstein's retrial resulted in a mistrial for one count of rape in the third degree due to a hung jury, as announced by Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Curtis Farber on Thursday.
  • The jury convicted Weinstein of criminal sex acts in the first degree for assaulting Miriam Haley in 2006 and acquitted him of charges from Kaja Sokola's allegations.
  • Juror intimidation was reported, leading to one juror feeling bullied during deliberations.
  • Jessica Mann testified about her alleged sexual assault by Weinstein, stating, "Rape can happen in relationships – and in dynamics where power and manipulation control the narrative."

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™