Hegseth sent secured intel from a general to his wife and brother: Report


Summary

What happened?

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth shared detailed war plans with his wife, brother and lawyer as U.S. fighter jets were taking off to strike Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Where was it sent?

Hegseth sent the information on the encrypted messaging app Signal. He had to separate chats, one for cabinet members, the other for family members and aides.

What will Trump do?

President Trump said he still supports his secretary at the Department of Defense.


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

What happened?

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth shared detailed war plans with his wife, brother and lawyer as U.S. fighter jets were taking off to strike Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Where was it sent?

Hegseth sent the information on the encrypted messaging app Signal. He had to separate chats, one for cabinet members, the other for family members and aides.

What will Trump do?

President Trump said he still supports his secretary at the Department of Defense.


Full story

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared detailed war plans with his wife, brother and lawyer as U.S. fighter jets were taking off to strike Houthi rebels in Yemen. According to a report from NBC News, Army Gen. Michael Kurilla sent Secretary Hegseth details, including when the jets were expected to hit their targets, on a secure government server. Less than 10 minutes later, Hegseth shared the information in two group chats on the messaging app Signal — one with cabinet officials, the other with family members and aides.

What is Hegseth’s response?

In an interview with “Fox and Friends” on the morning of Tuesday, April 22, Hegseth dismissed the new report, saying he takes classified information very seriously and that it was likely leaked by employees who were recently fired for allegedly leaking.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“What was shared over Signal, then and now, however you characterize it, was informal, unclassified coordinations for media coordination and other things,” Hegseth said. “That’s what I’ve said from the beginning.

“In this point, those folks who are leaking, who have been pushed out of the building, are now attempting to leak and sabotage the president’s agenda and what we’re doing. And that’s unfortunate.”

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said an NPR report stating the White House is looking for Hegseth’s replacement is fake news. President Trump expressed support for Hegseth on Monday and said he is doing a great job.

Hegseth’s past statements

Hegseth was a vocal critic of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s handling of classified and sensitive material on a private email server. While working for Fox News, he repeatedly said military or government officials who mishandle our nation’s secrets are normally criminally prosecuted.

“The fact that she wouldn’t be held accountable for this I think blows the mind of anyone who’s held our nation’s secrets dear,” Hegseth said on Fox News in November 2016. “Who has had a top-secret clearance like I’ve had and others who know that even one hiccup causes a problem, let alone a standard procedure like this.” 

Democrats and one Republican call for him to go

Democrats are renewing their calls for Hegseth to either resign or be fired.

“It’s against the rules in the Department of Defense, which he heads,” Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., said. “And there needs to be an investigation and accountability for this. We can’t have a secretary of defense sharing operational information to people he shouldn’t.”

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., a retired Air Force general, said the newly revealed security lapse is unacceptable, and that he wouldn’t tolerate it if he were in charge. However, he didn’t think it was his place to tell Hegseth to resign.

Hegseth said there is an investigation into former Pentagon officials who are accused of sharing information with the media. He said those investigations could ultimately lead to criminal referrals to the Department of Justice.

Snorre Wik (Photographer/Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

This story matters because it raises significant questions about national security protocols and the handling of classified information within the Department of Defense.

National security

The implications of sharing classified information compromise operational security and could jeopardize military personnel.

Leadership integrity

The actions of high-ranking officials like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth can undermine public trust in government and military leadership.

Accountability

Calls for accountability reflect concerns over governance standards and the responsible management of sensitive government information.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 22 media outlets

Common ground

Both sides of the political spectrum express concern regarding the security implications of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's actions. There is also a consensus that sharing sensitive military information with unauthorized individuals poses a serious threat to national security, regardless of the political affiliation of the commentators discussing the issue.

Context corner

The sharing of classified materials has historical precedence, often leading to significant consequences. High-profile incidents, like those involving former military officials or government staffers, have resulted in public outcry and investigations, impacting not only the individuals involved but the respective administrations as well.

The players

Key individuals in this situation include Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, whose actions are under scrutiny, and former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who has publicly questioned Hegseth's conduct. Additionally, President Donald Trump plays a critical role in defending Hegseth amid growing criticism.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

36 total sources

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline