Hegseth to cut 20% of 4-star generals, admirals


Summary

Leadership reduction

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a plan to reduce the number of top military officials, specifically targeting a minimum 20% reduction in four-star generals, National Guard officers and additional reductions in general and flag officers. This initiative is described as a step to improve military effectiveness by streamlining leadership.

Historical comparison

Hegseth highlighted the growth in the number of high-ranking officers compared to previous eras, noting the contrast between current numbers and those during World War II. He argued that an increase in senior officials does not necessarily correspond to battlefield success.

Reorganization process

The plan is structured in two phases: an initial reduction in senior leaders and a subsequent in-depth review of military operations. Hegseth described this effort as the most comprehensive military reorganization since the 1986 Goldwater-Nichols Act and clarified that it is meant to improve readiness, not to penalize officers.


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Leadership reduction

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a plan to reduce the number of top military officials, specifically targeting a minimum 20% reduction in four-star generals, National Guard officers and additional reductions in general and flag officers. This initiative is described as a step to improve military effectiveness by streamlining leadership.

Historical comparison

Hegseth highlighted the growth in the number of high-ranking officers compared to previous eras, noting the contrast between current numbers and those during World War II. He argued that an increase in senior officials does not necessarily correspond to battlefield success.

Reorganization process

The plan is structured in two phases: an initial reduction in senior leaders and a subsequent in-depth review of military operations. Hegseth described this effort as the most comprehensive military reorganization since the 1986 Goldwater-Nichols Act and clarified that it is meant to improve readiness, not to penalize officers.


Full story

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wants the U.S. military to reduce the number of officials attaining the highest ranks. In a Monday, May 5, memo to senior Pentagon officials, Hegseth said the reduction is part of “ensuring lethality of U.S. Military Forces.”

“To accomplish this mission, we must cultivate exceptional senior leaders who drive innovation and operational excellence, unencumbered by unnecessary bureaucratic layers that hinder their growth and effectiveness,” he said. 

The “Less generals, more G.I.s” order, as Hegseth referred to it in a post to X, reductions listed were a minimum 20% reduction of four-star generals across the Active Component, a minimum 20% reduction in National Guard officers and another 10% reduction in general and flag officers with the realignment of the Unified Command Plan. 

The plan would be split into two phases, Hegseth said. The first pertains to the 20% reductions, while the second offers a deeper examination of the military’s overall operation plan.

CBS News attributed Department of Defense data showing 38 four-star generals or admirals as of March 31. CNN listed 37 as recently as 2023. The Defense secretary said there are currently 44.

“Through these measures, we will uphold our position as the most lethal fighting force in the world, achieving peace through strength and ensuring greater efficiency, innovation, and preparedness for any challenge that lies ahead,” Hegseth said.

Telegraphed reductions

Hegseth gave a preview of sorts of his view that the American military branches had too many senior leaders. 

“There are thousands of additional Pentagon positions, headquarters positions, other positions that have been created over the last 30 years that don’t necessarily translate to battlefield success,” he told a town hall crowd at the Pentagon in February. “We won World War II with seven four-star generals. Today, we have 44.”

Hegseth said the reduction aims to “maximize strategic readiness,” not to “slash and burn” high-ranking officers. He called it the most comprehensive military reorganization since the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986

The reorganization comes months after the Trump administration announced the firing of Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr. on Feb. 21. Brown served as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Hegseth has also steered reductions in headcount at the Pentagon with the consultation of the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency.

Kaleb Gillespie (Video Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

A proposed reduction in senior military ranks by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reflects the Trump administration's effort to streamline U.S. Armed Forces leadership and enhance operational effectiveness.

Military leadership reform

Plans to reduce the number of top-ranking officers highlight a shift toward a leaner leadership structure within the U.S. military.

Operational efficiency

Streamlining military bureaucracy is intended to improve innovation, readiness, and the overall effectiveness of armed forces.

Broader defense policy

The initiative signals a potential long-term transformation in defense organization and priorities, reminiscent of past reorganizations.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 258 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The reduction orders target at least a 20% cut in four-star generals and admirals (about 7-9 positions out of 37-44), a 20% cut in National Guard general officers, and a 10% reduction in all general and flag officers out of roughly 900 active. The intended outcome is a leaner leadership structure, shifting resources toward field units.

Diverging views

Left-leaning articles focus on potential politicization and the threat of weakening military leadership by removing experienced or dissenting voices, warning of adverse operational effects. Right-leaning coverage frames the cuts as necessary efficiency boosts, shifting resources from bureaucracy to frontline troops, and aligns the measures closely with the administration’s “peace through strength” narrative.

History lesson

The Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986 is referenced as the last major restructuring, which centralized military advisory roles and command authority. Previous downsizing efforts have often followed major conflicts or were driven by changing security doctrines. Past attempts at reducing bureaucracy have met mixed results in terms of efficiency and readiness.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Hegseth’s 20% reduction in senior generals as a politically charged “purge” laden with skepticism, using terms like “cut,” “serious allegations,” and “slash and burn exercise” to imply recklessness and potential harm to military effectiveness.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right champion the move as a “historic” and necessary reform, employing positive rhetoric—“leaner,” “more lethal,” and labeling top ranks “redundant”—to emphasize bureaucratic trimming and empowerment of frontline troops.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

258 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered a 20% reduction in the number of four-star generals and admirals across the military, which may eliminate eight to nine positions.
  • The memo calls for an additional 10% reduction in general and flag officers across all military ranks, impacting around 900 officers.
  • Hegseth emphasized that these cuts aim to remove redundancy and optimize military leadership structures, stating that they will not be punitive but rather methods to streamline operations.
  • The Pentagon has been directed to execute these cuts expeditiously, although no specific timeline was provided, and a spokesperson declined to comment on implementation details.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Monday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directed the Pentagon's top leadership to reduce the total count of four-star generals and admirals in the military by a minimum of 20%.
  • Hegseth initiated the order based on his prior argument that the military maintains too many senior generals, a stance he expressed during his confirmation hearing.
  • The signed memo instructs a reduction in redundant command roles by cutting a portion of senior general and admiral ranks within the military and National Guard to enhance leadership efficiency.
  • At the beginning of this year, the military included 37 officers holding four-star ranks and approximately 900 general and flag officers in total; the memo described the planned reductions as essential for eliminating redundant positions and enhancing leadership efficiency.
  • This directive implies a significant restructuring of senior military leadership aimed at improving efficiency by cutting the number of top-ranking officers by 20%.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth ordered a 20% reduction in four-star officers and general officers in the National Guard on May 5, to streamline leadership at the Pentagon.
  • Hegseth stated that these actions aim to remove redundancy and enhance military efficiency, emphasizing operational effectiveness.
  • This decision coincides with broader cuts, including dismissals of key officials like Gen. CQ Brown Jr.
  • Some lawmakers, including Sen. Jack Reed, expressed skepticism about the rationale behind these personnel changes and concerns that they could politicize the military.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™