Hegseth’s Pentagon gag order triggers Senate pushback on military nominees


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Communications policy

The Pentagon set a new policy that requires personnel to get approval from the legislative affairs office before communicating with Congress.

Nomination holds

At least two Senators said they could put a hold on DOD nominations if the policy is fully implemented.

$1 trillion

Congress said it will conduct full oversight of the military, which could have a nearly $1 trillion budget in 2026.


Full story

The Senate is considering a hold on Pentagon nominees if Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s new congressional communications memo is fully implemented. According to the memo obtained by NBC News, Department of Defense (DOD) personnel, including the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, will now have to get approval from the legislative affairs office before communicating with Congress.

News of the policy did not sit well with senior senators, including Republicans who voted to confirm Hegseth as defense secretary.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“We have Senate-confirmed nominees that I dare say [we] would be reluctant to confirm if our access to accurate information from the Department of Defense was inhibited in any way. I think Secretary Hegseth knows that,” Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said in response to the memo. 

Cornyn did not respond to Straight Arrow News’ question of whether he personally would be willing to put a hold on nominees. 

Agencies and personnel within the DOD were previously able to speak with Congress freely. The new policy is effective immediately, and Hegseth wrote that it is designed to achieve the department’s legislative goals. 

“Unauthorized engagements with Congress by [Department of War] personnel acting in their official capacity, no matter how well-intentioned, may undermine Department-wide priorities critical to achieving our legislative objectives,” the memo states. 

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., a senior member of the Armed Services Committee, called it a “concealment policy” that has to end. Cornyn said he does not want to be Chicken Little and act as if the sky is falling, given the power Congress has. 

“It’s a two-way street, and so I expect that to be worked out,” Cornyn said. “I think more communication is better so we can understand each other and we can conduct our proper oversight.” 

Congress has direct oversight of the Defense Department and sets the Pentagon’s budget and policy each year through the National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA. 

According to the political appointee tracker by the Partnership for Public Service, there are currently 25 nominees being considered by the Senate for senior positions at the Pentagon. That includes the comptroller/CFO, the chief information officer, multiple general counsel positions and assistant secretary positions. 

The Senate Armed Services Committee considers about 50,000 civilian and military nominations every year for the Department of Defense and each military branch. 

Blumenthal confirmed to Straight Arrow News that he would be willing to put a hold on those nominees. 

“I think we need to exercise every tool and power that we can to make sure that there’s adequate disclosure and coverage of what’s happening in the United States Pentagon,” he told SAN. “Americans deserve to know how a trillion dollars of taxpayer money is spent by the Pentagon.”

The Pentagon is on track to have a $961 billion budget in 2026, the biggest in history. The Department of Defense is composed of 1.3 million active duty military members, 761,000 reserve members and 950,000 civilians. 

“You’ve got to trust your chain of command. This is too large of an organization to have that kind of a tight clamp on it,” Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., told reporters. “Particularly when we have members that want specific answers, not going through protocol.” 

In addition to blocking nominations, Congress also has subpoena power. It can also try to reverse the new policy in the 2026 NDAA, which has yet to be approved. If included in the NDAA, it would no longer be a policy but a law.

Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The Pentagon's new requirement for approval before Defense Department officials communicate with Congress could affect legislative oversight, transparency, and the traditional flow of information between government branches.

Oversight and transparency

Centralizing and restricting communication may reduce Congress's ability to exercise oversight and gather unfiltered information about Defense Department activities, as noted by concerns from lawmakers in multiple sources.

Information control

Department leaders state the policy aims to ensure consistent messaging and prevent unauthorized disclosures, but critics express concern it could limit transparency.

Legislative process implications

The move could affect Senate confirmations and legislative work, as senators consider using holds on Defense nominees as leverage against the communication policy.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 117 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The new Pentagon memo applies to senior department leaders, service chiefs and thousands of personnel engaging in legislative affairs, potentially affecting thousands of day-to-day communications between the Pentagon and Congress according to multiple sources.

History lesson

Previous administrations have sometimes paused or reviewed Pentagon engagement with Congress during sensitive times, but sources say this level of centralization is unusually strict compared to historical norms.

Policy impact

If rigorously enforced, the new approval process may slow or complicate legislative oversight and delay responses to lawmakers' inquiries, affecting the efficiency of government operations and oversight.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left portray the Pentagon's new communication policy as Hegseth "cracking down" and attempting to "choke back the flow of information," making it "harder for Congress to stop him," highlighting negative implications for oversight.
  • Media outlets in the center maintain a neutral tone, describing the action as "tightens communication controls" or "changes policy," focusing on the procedural aspect.
  • Media outlets on the right use "tightens control" and "clamps down," sometimes with an "EXCLUSIVE" framing, and notably refers to the "Department of War," suggesting a different institutional perspective.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

146 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Department of Defense has mandated that Pentagon staff must get approval before communicating with Congress, as stated in a memo signed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Deputy Secretary Steve Feinberg.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Oct. 15, the Pentagon's memo orders Defense Department personnel to route all interactions with Congress and officials through the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs, requiring approval for engagements outside the national capital region.
  • Seeking to control Pentagon messaging, the memo says `The Department of War relies on a collaborative and close partnership with Congress to achieve our legislative goals` and warns unauthorized talks may undermine priorities like re-establishing deterrence and rebuilding the military.
  • Scope-Wise, the memo states the assistant secretary of legislative affairs will conduct a review with a report due in 90 days, while Pentagon component heads have 30 days to submit contact lists and organizational charts.
  • A congressional aide warned the policy could potentially backfire as staff need Pentagon information quickly, while Capitol Hill staff and reporters faced restrictions leading dozens to quit last week.
  • The directive reverses past practice by military services and combatant commands, centralizing control of reports, responses, and visits under the Pentagon's central legislative affairs office, while authorized working groups support compliance.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Pentagon has mandated that all Defense Department communication with Congress go through the central legislative affairs office, as reported by Breaking Defense.
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg issued a directive on Oct. 15 requiring coordination for all congressional engagements.
  • Unauthorized congressional engagements by Defense Department personnel may undermine key legislative objectives, according to Hegseth and Feinberg's memo.
  • A congressional aide expressed concerns that the new policy could backfire, delaying crucial information needed for appropriations discussions.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.