HHS secretary dismisses entire vaccine advisory panel


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Committee dismissed

HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dismissed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on June 9. The unprecedented move was described as a "clean sweep" needed to restore public confidence in vaccine science.

Kennedy's justification

In an op-ed, Secretary Kennedy claimed the panel was a "rubber stamp" plagued by conflicts of interest that never recommended against a vaccine. He also stated the move was necessary for the Trump administration to appoint a majority to the committee before 2028.

Widespread criticism

Major medical groups, including the American Medical Association, called the action reckless and warned it could fuel the spread of preventable diseases. Experts and some Republican senators expressed concern that new members could not be properly vetted in just two weeks.


Full story

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has dismissed all 17 members of the federal government’s vaccine advisory panel, effective Monday, June 9. Kennedy said he will soon install his own appointees.

In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Kennedy described the move as a “clean sweep” needed to restore public confidence. The move to prematurely remove the entire Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, is unprecedented.

Why did Secretary Kennedy dismiss the vaccine advisory committee?

Secretary Kennedy wrote that the dismissals were part of an effort to put “the restoration of public trust above any pro- or antivaccine agenda.” He argued the committee was “plagued with persistent conflicts of interest.” He called it “little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine.”

In his op-ed, Kennedy claimed the panel “failed to scrutinize vaccine products given to babies and pregnant women” and has never recommended against a vaccine. To support his claims, he cited a 2000 House investigation and a 2009 HHS inspector-general report, which he said found weak enforcement of conflict-of-interest rules. Kennedy said that removing the Biden-era members now allows the Trump administration to seat a new majority before the 2028 election.

What is the role of the advisory committee?

ACIP advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on how licensed vaccines should be used in the United States. The expert panel, traditionally composed of pediatricians, immunologists and epidemiologists, reviews data and makes recommendations for the public.

These recommendations inform the CDC’s official vaccine schedule, which in turn influences insurance coverage requirements under the Affordable Care Act. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, not the ACIP, is responsible for the initial approval of vaccines.

How have medical groups reacted?

Numerous medical and public health organizations condemned the decision. The American Medical Association stated the move undermines a transparent process and could fuel the spread of preventable diseases. The Infectious Diseases Society of America called Kennedy’s allegations “completely unfounded” and the dismissals “reckless.”

Some Republican senators spoke out. Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana expressed concerns that the new committee could be comprised of “people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion.” A dismissed ACIP member told CNN the action will “fundamentally destabilize vaccination in America,” adding that the committee has a highly rigorous conflict-of-interest policy.

What happens next?

HHS says ACIP’s next scheduled meeting will proceed as scheduled from June 25 to 27 in Atlanta. This gives the agency approximately two weeks to select and vet an entirely new panel.

Kennedy wrote that new members “won’t directly work for the vaccine industry” and will “foster a culture of critical inquiry.” Legal and public-health experts, however, question whether such a rapid turnaround is feasible or safe for a committee that steers U.S. vaccine policy.

Jonah Applegarth (Production Specialist), Devan Markham (Morning Digital Producer), and Kaleb Gillespie (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

The removal of all members of the federal vaccine advisory panel by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. raises questions about the future of vaccine policy, transparency and public trust in immunization programs in the U.S.

Public trust

Kennedy justified the action as an effort to “restore public trust,” but medical groups and experts warn it could have the opposite effect by destabilizing confidence in vaccination processes.

Expert oversight

The sudden dismissal of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) challenges the role of long-standing expert panels in providing evidence-based recommendations for vaccine policy.

Conflicts of interest

Kennedy cited persistent conflicts of interest in the old committee as a reason for the dismissals, a claim disputed by medical organizations, highlighting ongoing debates about governance and integrity in public health decision-making.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 373 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Several articles reference that 17 members of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) were removed. HHS stated that 13 of those 17 were appointed in 2024. As a result, the current administration would not have had the ability to appoint a majority until 2028. This directly influenced both the timing and impact of Kennedy's decision.

Community reaction

Medical organizations and health professionals have expressed alarm at the decision. According to statements from the American Medical Association and others, there is concern that removing experienced members could undermine public trust and disrupt established processes. Meanwhile, some advocacy groups supportive of Kennedy’s prior stance see the move as a potential for reform.

Debunking

Kennedy has cited persistent conflicts of interest as justification; however, NPR and others report that while financial relationships exist, robust disclosure and recusal procedures are standard. Past government reports cited by Kennedy indicated omissions in paperwork, but not necessarily widespread corruption or significant financial conflicts among members. Claims about ACIP being a mere "rubber stamp" are disputed by past records.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Kennedy’s removal of all 17 CDC vaccine advisory panel members as a disruptive and politically motivated act, employing charged terms like “manufactured chaos” and “boots” that underscore a narrative of reckless interference undermining trusted scientific institutions.
  • Media outlets in the center avoid emotionally loaded language, presenting factual accounts and highlighting Kennedy’s skepticism.
  • Media outlets on the right describe the purge as a bold, necessary correction to a “rubber stamp” panel rife with conflicts of interest, framing Kennedy’s action as restoring “public trust” through decisive reform.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

373 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the removal of all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, citing conflicts of interest as the reason for the change.
  • Kennedy's decision to replace the entire panel aims to restore public trust in vaccine recommendations, as stated in his op-ed for the Wall Street Journal.
  • Critics, including the American Medical Association, argue that this move undermines public trust and the transparency of the advisory process.
  • The ACIP is scheduled to meet to discuss various vaccine-related topics amid concerns about the future direction of vaccine policy under the new appointments.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • This past Monday, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., serving as health secretary, dismissed the entire group of 17 individuals who advise the CDC on vaccine policies.
  • Kennedy justified the removals by alleging persistent conflicts of interest among the panel members, although no specific evidence has been provided.
  • He announced plans to appoint new members who will think critically and not simply approve vaccine policies without question.
  • In a Wall Street Journal op-ed, Kennedy emphasized that the public deserves transparency and assurance that health agency guidelines are based on impartial scientific evidence.
  • The shake-up could significantly alter vaccine recommendations and aims to restore public trust amid ongoing debate about politics influencing scientific advice.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. replaced all 17 members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, aiming to restore public trust and reduce conflicts of interest.
  • Kennedy claimed a "clean sweep" was necessary to reestablish confidence in vaccine science and criticized the committee's previous alignment with the interests of the Biden administration.
  • Medical groups, including the American Public Health Association, condemned the ouster, calling it a "coup" and expressing concerns about the future impartiality of the panel.
  • Kennedy plans to appoint new members within two weeks, aiming for experts who prioritize public health and transparency in vaccine science.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™