House GOP proposes deep Medicaid cuts as part of Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Medicaid changes

House Republicans proposed new Medicaid rules requiring work hours, biannual eligibility checks and higher co-pays for some enrollees.

Projected impact

The Congressional Budget Office estimates 8.6 million people could lose coverage by 2034 under the plan, with low-income seniors and disabled individuals most affected.

Policy tradeoffs

The bill aims to offset $4.5 trillion in tax breaks with $880 billion in savings, mainly through Medicaid and Affordable Care Act policy changes.


Full story

House Republicans introduced legislation that would reduce Medicaid spending and alter eligibility rules as part of President Donald Trump’s broader tax and budget proposal. The bill aims to save at least $880 billion over a decade to offset an estimated $4.5 trillion in tax breaks.

What does the bill change about Medicaid?

Rather than restructuring Medicaid entirely, the bill imposes stricter eligibility criteria and cost-sharing rules to limit access. The bill requires “able-bodied” adults without dependents to meet 80 hours per month of work, school or volunteer activity to retain eligibility. It also calls for semiannual income verification checks and higher co-payments for certain enrollees.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

The federal poverty line for a single adult in 2025 is approximately $15,650.

The bill would require adults earning just above the poverty line to pay $35 per visit, with the annual cap set at 5% of their income. These cost-sharing requirements would apply nationwide.

The proposal also freezes provider tax rates that states use to draw down additional federal Medicaid funds, a move that critics warn could destabilize state budgets. Every state except Alaska currently levies these taxes.

How many people would lose coverage?

According to a preliminary estimate from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) shared by Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the legislation would result in 8.6 million fewer Americans having health insurance by 2034. The CBO’s analysis estimated that 2.3 million people, many of them low-income seniors and disabled individuals on Medicare, would lose Medicaid due to administrative hurdles.

How do the changes impact the Affordable Care Act?

In addition to Medicaid revisions, the bill targets the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions. It would shorten enrollment periods and limit automatic renewal options. It also restricts immigrants’ access to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and removes certain federal subsidies.

Based on early CBO estimates cited by committee Democrats, the Medicaid and ACA changes account for approximately $715 billion in savings over 10 years.

Are there social policy changes in the bill?

Yes. The legislation bars Medicaid funding for gender-affirming care for transgender minors. It also cuts off Medicaid reimbursements to organizations that provide abortion services, including Planned Parenthood, though federal law already prohibits direct abortion funding.

Additionally, the bill penalizes states that offer Medicaid-like coverage to undocumented immigrants. States that do so would receive a reduced federal match — 80% instead of the typical 90% — for coverage of all childless, non-disabled adults.

What is Trump’s position?

Trump has not detailed specific Medicaid provisions but has endorsed adding work requirements. Despite the proposed reductions, he has publicly insisted that he does not support cutting the program. The bill aligns with Trump’s broader plan to preserve and expand the 2017 tax cuts, many of which expire at the end of the year.

House Speaker Mike Johnson set a Memorial Day deadline to advance the legislation, requiring approval from both chambers of Congress.

How are lawmakers responding?

Democrats strongly oppose the bill. Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., ranking Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee, said the proposal would strip health care from millions and increase financial pressure on seniors and hospitals.

“This is not trimming fat from around the edges, it’s cutting to the bone,” he said.

Some moderate Republicans have expressed reservations about Medicaid reductions, and GOP leaders must balance fiscal conservatives’ demands with political realities in states where Medicaid enrollment remains high.

The Energy and Commerce Committee is scheduled to begin formal debate this week.

Devan Markham (Morning Digital Producer), Jonah Applegarth (Production Specialist), and Kaleb Gillespie (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

Congress is debating substantial changes to Medicaid and related health care programs that could result in millions losing coverage, reshape federal spending and impact key social policy areas, generating significant division among lawmakers and broad public concern.

Medicaid and health coverage cuts

According to the Congressional Budget Office, the proposed $880 billion reduction to Medicaid and changes to eligibility rules could result in 8.6 million fewer Americans with health insurance over the next decade.

Political division and legislative process

There is intense debate among lawmakers, with Republicans emphasizing fiscal savings and new requirements while many Democrats and some moderate Republicans warn about negative impacts on coverage.

Broader policy changes

The legislation includes provisions affecting energy policy, gender-affirming care, abortion funding and immigration-related health benefits, illustrating how budgetary measures are intertwined with broader policy debates on social and economic issues.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 34 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The proposed legislation aims to cut $880 billion, mainly from Medicaid, over 10 years, to help offset the cost of $4.5 trillion in tax breaks. According to the Congressional Budget Office, these changes could result in 8.6 million fewer people having healthcare coverage in that period and a deficit reduction of $912 billion, $715 billion of which comes from health provisions.

Policy impact

If enacted, new policies would introduce work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents, enforce twice-annual eligibility verifications and restrict Medicaid funds for certain groups. These changes could disrupt coverage for millions, create administrative hurdles, shift costs to states and impact hospitals and care providers, especially those serving low-income and rural populations.

Solution spotlight

Some state lawmakers have pursued local legislation to protect coverage regardless of federal policy changes. Advocacy groups encourage public testimony and education to inform lawmakers of Medicaid’s importance, while some healthcare providers are seeking to expand alternative coverage programs or safety nets to anticipate possible federal funding reductions.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Medicaid proposal overwhelmingly as socially damaging “cuts” that will leave “millions without care,” employing emotionally charged language like “shameful” and “massive rollbacks” to underscore harm to vulnerable populations and climate policy.
  • Media outlets in the center emphasize fiscal responsibility, highlighting the bill’s role in reducing “waste, fraud and abuse,” funding $4.5 trillion in tax breaks and instituting “community engagement” requirements as necessary reforms.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize fiscal responsibility, highlighting the bill’s role in reducing “waste, fraud and abuse,” funding $4.5 trillion in tax breaks and instituting “community engagement” requirements as necessary reforms.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

86 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • House Republicans revealed at least $880 billion in cuts, mostly to Medicaid, to help fund $4.5 trillion in tax breaks from President Donald Trump’s bill.
  • The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the proposals may lead to 8.6 million Americans losing health care coverage over the next decade.
  • New requirements include 80 hours of work, education or service for able-bodied adults to qualify for Medicaid, affecting over 70 million Americans.
  • House Republicans aim for at least $1.5 trillion in savings and have received pushback from over a dozen members against cuts to health care programs.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Sunday night, House Republicans released the Medicaid section of President Donald Trump's tax legislation, proposing cuts exceeding $880 billion primarily targeting Medicaid to finance $4.5 trillion in tax reductions and spending cuts.
  • The legislation comes after an unsuccessful 2017 Republican effort to overturn and substitute the Affordable Care Act and seeks to achieve savings by implementing new work requirements and eligibility changes amid ongoing political debates over health care.
  • The bill introduces a mandate that able-bodied adults without dependents must participate in work, education or community service for a minimum of 80 hours each month, while also reducing certain funding streams, including the removal of a 5% pandemic-era Medicaid increase and freezing provider taxes — measures that impact states that expanded Medicaid through federal incentives.
  • A preliminary nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis estimates the proposals would reduce health coverage by 8.6 million people over a decade while cutting the deficit by $912 billion, with $715 billion from health provisions.
  • Democrats warn that millions would lose coverage, premiums would rise and hospitals could close. At the same time, Republicans say savings keep tax break promises and ensure Medicaid serves eligible people amid resistance from some House Republicans to cuts.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline