How do Hertz’s AI damage scans work? A congresswoman wants to know


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Demanding answers

Rep. Nancy Mace is questioning Hertz’s use of AI to scan rental cars for damage without human review.

Customer complaints

Customers have reported being charged hundreds of dollars for minor or invisible damage.

Company’s defense

Hertz defends the system as efficient and transparent, claiming most scans result in no charges.


Hertz reportedly does not have humans verify artificial intelligence scans before billing customers hundreds of dollars for supposed damage to rental vehicles, and a congresswoman wants to know why. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-SC, sent a letter to Hertz CEO Gil West, asking for a “better understanding [of] Hertz’s experience as an early adopter of AI scanning technology.”

“Some other car rental companies reportedly use AI as a tool but require human staff to review any damage flagged by the scanning system before billing customers; however, Hertz is apparently the only car rental company in the U.S. that issues damage assessments to customers without human review,” Mace, chair of a House cybersecurity subcommittee, wrote.

She questioned how the AI scanners “will benefit [Hertz’s] customers and how the use of AI scanning may impact Hertz’s work as a vendor to the Federal government.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Customer complaints and concerns mount

In April, Hertz announced a partnership with UVeye, a company specializing in AI-powered vehicle inspection technology. The system is designed to scan vehicles for damage such as dings, dents and scratches. 

Hertz uses the UVeye AI scanner technology at six airports: Atlanta, Charlotte, Dallas, Houston, Newark and Phoenix. 

However, some customers have raised concerns, reporting that they have been charged for damage that is not visible to the naked eye. Several people reported receiving bills for hundreds of dollars without any details of human-verified damage.

One customer told The Drive he was charged $440 for a scuff on a wheel just minutes after dropping off his rental car.

Hertz defends technology as efficient and transparent

Hertz claims its AI technology improves transparency and efficiency by speeding up the inspection process. The company says the system can quickly scan a vehicle, compare before-and-after images and produce detailed reports that show any damage.

Hertz says more than 97% of the vehicles scanned by the system show no damage that would result in a charge to the customer.

Mace’s letter gave Hertz until Aug. 27 to reply. Straight Arrow News has reached out to Hertz for comment.

Tags: , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Hertz's use of AI to assess rental car damage without human review raises questions about fairness, transparency, and potential customer impacts, including governmental business ties and broader adoption within the industry.

AI technology in customer service

The implementation of AI for vehicle damage assessments represents a shift in how companies engage with customers and handle disputes, raising questions about reliability and accountability.

Consumer protection and transparency

Concerns from customers and lawmakers focus on whether customers are being fairly charged and properly informed, emphasizing the need for transparency and safeguards in corporate processes.

Corporate practices and government oversight

Congressional attention reflects growing scrutiny over automated decision-making in private companies, especially when those companies have contracts with federal agencies or public-facing services.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Timeline

Timeline