How Trump’s payout delays just made E. Jean Carroll more money


President Donald Trump spent three years and multiple rounds of appeals trying to avoid paying author and journalist E. Jean Carroll a $5 million jury verdict. But that fight cost him about $800,000 more. 

On Wednesday, a federal judge ordered the release of $5.8 million to Carroll after the Supreme Court refused to hear Trump’s appeal of the 2023 verdict, according to The Associated Press.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™

Point phone camera here

How did the money grow? 

Back in May 2023, a Manhattan jury awarded Carroll $5 million after it found Trump liable for sexually abusing her in the 1990s and defaming her after he denied it.

Rather than pay the fee, Trump deposited the funds into a court-controlled escrow account after the decision to secure a stay while he appealed. The deposit has now grown to its current amount through interest accrued over the years. 

The account Trump deposited the $5 million into is part of the Court Registry Investment System, or CRIS. The system is a tool federal courts use whenever a party appeals a judgment and wants to pause collection in the meantime.

Once a party deposits money into the account, the system pools those funds with money from other cases nationwide to buy U.S. Treasury securities. Those securities are then held until they mature. 

Interest accrues the entire time the case works its way through the appeals process. Once a judge orders the court to disburse funds from the escrow account, the interest earned is also included. 

Court case timeline

During the three years the case remained in legal limbo, Trump exhausted nearly every available avenue to deny Carroll the money. 

Trump first appealed to the district court, then to the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, before sending the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The justices declined to hear the case late last month. 

Federal Judge Lewis A. Kaplan then moved to have the funds disbursed. But Trump’s lawyers argued the president shouldn’t have to pay because they are weighing a request asking the Supreme Court to reconsider its denial. 

Kaplan rejected the argument and ordered the money released. Trump’s lawyers have appealed that ruling to the Second Circuit, according to The Guardian

What’s next?

The $5.8 million payout resolves only the smaller of Carroll’s two verdicts against Trump. In January 2024, a separate jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million after it ruled that Trump made defamatory statements about her as president.

But in that case, Trump didn’t put the money in a CRIS account. Instead, he secured a bond, now totaling nearly $100 million, through an insurer. Unlike an escrowed account, the bond isn’t Trump’s money sitting somewhere. Rather, it’s a guarantee he pays to the insurer to cover the judgment if Trump loses. Because there are no accounts, nothing grows interest, as in Carroll’s smaller case. 

That case remains on track for the Supreme Court.


Round out your reading

Tags: , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal judge ordered $5.8 million released to E. Jean Carroll after the Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal, illustrating how the federal Court Registry Investment System works when judgments are appealed.

How court escrow accounts work

When a party appeals a judgment and wants to pause collection, federal courts use the CRIS system, which pools deposited funds to purchase U.S. Treasury Securities that earn interest until the case is resolved.

Bond vs. escrow distinction

In Carroll's larger $83.3 million case, Trump secured a bond through an insurer rather than depositing cash, meaning no interest accrues and the money is not held in a court account.

Larger verdict still unresolved

The $5.8 million payout covers only the 2023 verdict; a separate $83.3 million defamation judgment, secured by a bond now totaling nearly $100 million, remains on track for the Supreme Court.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more