ICE misused legal procedures to target Columbia students: Report


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

ICE affidavit in question

ICE allegedly misused legal procedures to target two Columbia University students for deportation, including using a flawed affidavit to search dorm rooms, a new report by The Intercept said.

Columbia student fighting back

The case centers on Yunseo Chung, a lawful green card holder accused of threatening U.S. foreign policy due to her criticism of Israel.

Case ongoing

A federal judge blocked Chung's arrest. The case is ongoing with a hearing set for May 29.


Full story

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the Trump administration allegedly misused legal procedures to target two Columbia University students for deportation, The Intercept reported. A high-ranking ICE agent provided an affidavit to a federal judge to obtain a search warrant for the students’ dorm rooms.

Attorneys told The Intercept that the ICE affidavit misstated facts in the case and federal law. The previously sealed affidavit was made public in federal court on Tuesday as part of an ongoing lawsuit by Yunseo Chung, a Columbia University student and lawful green card holder.

The Trump administration is attempting to revoke Chung’s legal status after she protested the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza on Columbia’s campus.

Rubio invokes foreign policy provision

Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked a federal provision that allows the government to declare a foreign national’s presence a threat to U.S. foreign policy. Rubio claimed Chung’s presence in the United States could harm U.S. foreign relations, specifically citing her critical stance on Israel.

When federal immigration authorities sought to detain Chung and other foreign students at Columbia, ICE argued the university was “harboring” the students and suggested potential criminal activity. The signed affidavit ICE used to gain access to Chung’s dorm at Columbia was later found to contain significant factual and legal errors, according to The Intercept. Despite the inaccuracies, a judge approved the search.

To legally accuse the university of harboring, ICE would typically need to show either that the person was definitively in the U.S. illegally or that the university took active steps to hide or protect them from immigration enforcement. The affidavit did not provide actual proof that Columbia was hiding the students.

ICE and Columbia did not reply to a request for comment by The Intercept.

Columbia policy requires search warrant

Columbia University’s policy states that federal immigration agents can only search non-public university buildings, including student dormitories, if they have a search warrant signed by a judge.

“Secretly and unconstitutionally, the government supposedly revoked Yunseo’s green card and then told a judge it needed to search her apartment for ‘fruits and instrumentalities’ of Columbia University’s alleged ‘harboring’ of her,” Joshua Colangelo-Bryan, Chung’s attorney, told The Intercept. “In other words, the government wanted a judicial fig leaf to enter Yunseo’s apartment and unconstitutionally arrest her.”

Chung protected by injunction, court case continues

ICE agents have not detained Chung. In March, a federal judge issued a temporary injunction prohibiting the Trump administration from arresting her.

Her case is ongoing in court, with the next hearing scheduled for May 29.

Cassandra Buchman (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , ,

Why this story matters

The story raises concerns about the use of immigration enforcement procedures, alleged factual and legal errors in affidavits and the intersection of campus activism with U.S. foreign policy and legal protections.

Immigration enforcement procedures

The article highlights how immigration authorities used legal processes, including affidavits and search warrants, to target college students, prompting questions about proper procedures and protections.

Campus activism

The case involves a student facing the potential revocation of her legal status after participating in campus protests, illustrating the intersection between political activism and immigration law.

Legal safeguards

The situation underscores the importance of safeguards like warrant requirements and injunctions in protecting individual rights when government actions are challenged for legal and factual accuracy.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 17 media outlets

Context corner

Historically, Columbia University has been a site of high-profile student activism, including during the civil rights and Vietnam War eras. Recent years have seen ongoing debates over campus protest, free speech and responses to unrest tied to Middle East conflicts.

Global impact

Protests like those at Columbia highlight how U.S. university actions reverberate globally, especially concerning issues like Israel-Palestine. These tensions often mirror international debates, with repercussions for academic collaborations, visa policies for foreign students and perceptions of American higher education abroad. Forced deportations or divestment decisions could have broader international ripple effects.

History lesson

Campus protests over global issues are not new; Columbia was a key site during the 1968 anti-Vietnam War movement. University responses have varied historically, from negotiation to police intervention. Recent federal actions to cut funding in response to campus unrest represent a significant use of executive power not commonly seen in past decades of student activism.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed Columbia student Yunseo Chung as a "protester" "fighting deportation," emphasizing her struggle against authority.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right highlighted that Chung was an "anti-Israel protester" involved in a "pro-Palestinian protest," framing her activities negatively.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

17 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal judge ruled that Yunseo Chung, a Columbia University student, cannot be detained by immigration officials while she fights her deportation case in court.
  • Chung, a lawful permanent resident since age 7, filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, claiming the government misused immigration enforcement to suppress free speech.
  • The Department of Homeland Security accused Chung of engaging in "concerning conduct," including an arrest at a protest.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal judge ruled that immigration authorities must stop attempting to arrest Yunseo Chung, allowing her to contest deportation in court.
  • Chung has lived in the U.S. since she was 7 years old and is suing the government, claiming that deportation efforts are an attempt to suppress protected speech.
  • U.S. District Judge Naomi Buchwald ruled that the government had not provided sufficient facts to support its claims against Chung.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™