ICE officers can enter homes without a judge’s warrant: Memo


Summary

No signature needed

Federal immigration officers do not need a warrant signed by a judge to forcibly enter peoples' homes, according to an internal ICE memo obtained by the Associated Press.

Whistleblowers speak out

Two anonymous U.S. government officials turned the May 2025 memo over to Congress, alleging it permits forced entry without just probable cause.

DHS stands by order

DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said officers who enter people's homes under administrative warrants have found probable cause for the person’s arrest.


Full story

Federal immigration officers do not need a judge’s approval to forcibly enter peoples’ homes, according to an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) memo obtained by the Associated Press. The memo reverses the agency’s longstanding guidance requiring a judicial warrant to do so.

Whistleblowers raise concerns

The nonprofit group Whistleblower Aid says it represents two anonymous U.S. government officials who turned the May 2025 memo over to Congress. They allege that it permits forced entry without just probable cause that someone is in the country illegally.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The group contends that the ICE memo violates the Fourth Amendment and the Department of Homeland Security’s own policy manual.

Prior to the memo, ICE officers could enter homes only with a judicial warrant. Now, all they need is deportation orders.

“Although the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not historically relied on administrative warrants alone to arrest aliens subject to final orders of removal in their place of residence, the DHS Office of General Counsel has recently determined that the U.S. Constitution, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the immigration regulations do not prohibit relying on administrative warrants for this purpose.”

– Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons in an internal memo dated May 12, 2025

The memo says agents have to knock on the door and identify themselves first, but if they’re denied entry, they can let themselves in. It also limits the window in which they can carry out administrative warrants to between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m.

Whistleblowers say the memo was distributed only to “select DHS officials,” before they shared it with certain employees under the instruction to read it and return it.

The whistleblower disclosure also says instructors at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) in Brunswick, Ga. “are directed to verbally train all new ICE Agents to follow this policy while disregarding written course material instructing the opposite.”

DHS pushes back

The Department of Homeland Security is standing by the order. In an e-mail to the AP, spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin said officers who enter people’s homes under administrative warrants have found probable cause for the person’s arrest.

“Every illegal alien who DHS serves administrative warrants/I-205s have had full due process and a final order of removal from an immigration judge,” McLaughlin said. “The officers issuing these administrative warrants also have found probable cause. For decades, the Supreme Court and Congress have recognized the propriety of administrative warrants in cases of immigration enforcement.”


This story is featured in today’s Unbiased Updates. Watch the full episode here.


The AP reports that McLaughlin did not respond to questions about whether ICE officers entered a person’s home since the memo was issued, relying solely on an administrative warrant and if so, how often.

Call for investigation

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., has already issued a formal call for an investigation, calling for hearings in both the Senate Judiciary and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committees.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable government searches and seizures, requiring warrants based on probable cause that specifically describe what to search or seize.

“Every American should be terrified by this secret ICE policy authorizing its agents to kick down your door and storm into your home. It is a legally and morally abhorrent policy that exemplifies the kinds of dangerous, disgraceful abuses America is seeing in real time,” Blumenthal said in a statement.

He wrote a letter the Director of FLETC “to determine if instructors have secretly been directed to verbally train newly hired ICE agents to enter people’s homes without a judicial warrant.”

Blumenthal also wrote a letter addressed to Lyons and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, demanding answers about the new policy and how it’s being implemented.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A new ICE policy allowing forced home entry with only administrative warrants raises major constitutional questions and could reshape immigration enforcement practices, affecting civil liberties and the rights of both immigrants and U.S. citizens.

Fourth Amendment rights

The policy has sparked widespread debate because it bypasses judge-signed warrants, challenging long-standing protections against unreasonable searches that apply to everyone in the U.S., as numerous legal experts and advocacy groups have argued.

Immigration enforcement tactics

According to the Associated Press and whistleblower disclosures, ICE agents are now trained to forcibly enter homes using only administrative warrants, changing established enforcement protocols and intensifying nationwide immigration operations.

Government transparency and oversight

The Associated Press and advocacy groups report that the policy was not widely distributed within ICE and was revealed through whistleblowers, raising concerns among lawmakers like Sen. Richard Blumenthal about oversight, accountability, and secrecy in government directives.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 92 media outlets

Context corner

The Fourth Amendment has generally protected residents from law enforcement entering homes without judicial warrants. For years, advocates and legal guidance have told people not to allow ICE entry without a warrant signed by a judge, based on Supreme Court rulings.

Oppo research

Opponents including advocacy organizations and certain lawmakers describe the policy as unconstitutional and a threat to civil liberties. Sen. Richard Blumenthal and groups like Whistleblower Aid are calling for public hearings and judicial review of the directive.

Policy impact

If upheld, the new policy expands ICE authority and could lead to more forced entries and arrests in private homes, increasing community fear and potentially setting a precedent for diminished judicial oversight in deportation actions.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame this as a "firestorm" and "sharp reversal," alleging agents "conspired to ignore" constitutional limits, linking it to the "Trump administration" and specific officials, using terms like "absolute power" to evoke alarm.
  • Media outlets in the center report the "sweeping power" more neutrally but still highlight "constitutional concerns" and "alarming advocates," bridging the alarm of the left with the right's concise reporting.
  • Media outlets on the right while also noting "forced entry," de-emphasize constitutional analysis and broader political context, focusing concisely on perceived government overreach.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

92 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Federal immigration officers can forcibly enter homes without a judge's warrant under a new ICE memo, according to The Associated Press.
  • The memo asserts that relying on administrative warrants is constitutional despite previous guidance prohibiting such actions.
  • Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin stated that those served with administrative warrants have had due process and asked for confirmation of home entries since the memo's release.
  • U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal criticized the policy as unconstitutional and demanded accountability for the potential violation of citizens' rights.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On May 12, an internal ICE memo instructed agents to rely on administrative warrants to enter homes without judicial warrants, the Associated Press obtained and verified.
  • As the Trump administration expanded enforcement, it launched Operation Catch of the Day in Maine, mirroring deployments to Minneapolis, Illinois, and California amid broader immigration operations.
  • According to the whistleblower complaint, the memo was not formally distributed and supervisors verbally brief select personnel, while new ICE hires, many without law-enforcement backgrounds, are told to rely solely on administrative warrants despite contradictory ICE written training materials.
  • Protests and refusals to assist federal agents have paused new plate issuance and triggered outrage after Minneapolis/St. Paul operations tied to Renee Good's Jan. 7 fatal shooting, prompting U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal to open an inquiry.
  • Legal experts note the guidance conflicts with The Fourth Amendment and The U.S. Supreme Court precedent, while Whistleblower Aid senior vice president David Kligerman stresses no court has authorized ICE warrantless home entries, predicting legal challenges and Congressional oversight panels involvement.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Federal immigration officers can now forcibly enter homes without a judge's warrant, according to an internal memo from Immigration and Customs Enforcement obtained by The Associated Press.
  • Advocates claim this new practice violates Fourth Amendment protections that prevent unreasonable searches and seizures.
  • The memo bypasses longstanding guidelines that urged immigrants not to open doors to agents without a judicial warrant.
  • Medical and advocacy groups have criticized the directive, emphasizing that it contradicts years of guidance advising individuals not to open their doors to agents without judicial warrants.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.