Immigration bills set up partisan battle in North Carolina legislature


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Immigration enforcement

The North Carolina legislature has passed two bills, Senate Bill 153 and House Bill 318, which would expand the role of state and local law enforcement in federal immigration enforcement.

Partisan disagreement

Democratic and Republican lawmakers are divided on the bills, voting almost exclusively along party lines.

Governor's decision

Gov. Josh Stein, a Democrat, has not yet indicated whether he will sign or veto the bills.


Full story

Democratic North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein weighed two Republican-backed immigration bills that would expand the role of state and local law enforcement in aiding federal immigration efforts. The bills came as part of a wider effort by the Trump administration to crack down on immigrants living in the United States illegally.

Republican-led proposals

Senate Bill 153, titled the “North Carolina Border Protection Act,” would require state law enforcement agencies to cooperate with federal immigration authorities. It would also prohibit public universities in the UNC System from obstructing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and allow victims of crimes committed by immigrants residing in the country illegally to sue so-called “sanctuary” communities that don’t allow local law enforcement agencies to assist federal immigration efforts.

House Bill 318, an expansion of legislation passed in 2024, would require county sheriffs to detain undocumented inmates for at least 48 hours after their scheduled release and notify ICE at least two hours before releasing an inmate. The provisions are similar to those in ICE’s 287(g) program

“These bills support President Trump’s immigration policies and require law enforcement agencies controlled by Gov. Josh Stein to cooperate with ICE,” Republican Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger said in a post on X.

Democratic lawmakers have voiced concerns about potential overreach and racial profiling.

“(Business owners say) people who are here legally are not coming to work because it’s pick up first, ask questions later,” Democratic Senate Minority Leader Sydney Batch told reporters. “They fear that they’re just gonna be picked up on a raid, and you’ll never see them again.”

Political implications

Since taking office in January, Stein has not vetoed any legislation and has sought common ground with Republican lawmakers on issues like hurricane recovery aid. However, Democrats in both chambers overwhelmingly opposed the immigration bills, with all but one voting against both measures.

Stein has not said whether he will sign or veto the bills. He must decide by June 20.

If Stein vetoed either bill, Republicans would face a challenge in overriding him. The GOP is one seat short of a veto-proof majority in the House and would need at least one Democrat to cross party lines or miss the vote.

The governor has a history of opposing former President Donald Trump’s immigration policies. As a candidate, he said he would take a “wait and see” approach regarding cooperation with federal mass deportation plans.

During Trump’s first term, Stein, then serving as North Carolina’s attorney general, joined 16 other attorneys general in a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s travel ban, which targeted several Muslim-majority countries.

Stein’s office has not responded to requests for comment on the legislation.

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor) and Lawrence Banton (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein’s decision on immigration enforcement bills could impact state and local roles in federal immigration policy, influence relationships between law enforcement and immigrant communities, and shape political dynamics in the upcoming election cycle.

Immigration enforcement

The proposed legislation would significantly increase state and local cooperation with federal immigration authorities, impacting how immigration laws are implemented in North Carolina.

Political division

The bills have highlighted a partisan divide in the North Carolina legislature, with Republicans supporting enhanced enforcement and most Democrats opposing the measures due to concerns such as potential racial profiling.

Governor’s decision

Stein’s choice to sign or veto the bills is pivotal, as it will set a policy direction for the state and could influence both party strategies and public sentiment on immigration in North Carolina.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 24 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The legislation requires sheriffs to notify ICE when detainees face all felony charges and certain misdemeanors, and allows for holding them up to 48 hours. Proponents argue this could help remove individuals accused of serious crimes, while opponents warn this could affect a large number of detainees, many of whom may not be convicted, raising concerns about due process and community trust.

Context corner

Historically, the 287(g) program and similar laws have been used in other states to formalize cooperation between local law enforcement and ICE. Past efforts have led to debates over civil rights, with critics citing concerns about racial profiling and legal challenges. The North Carolina law closely aligns with recent federal executive orders aimed at maximizing such cooperation.

Do the math

The bills require that jails hold individuals with ICE detainers for up to 48 hours beyond the normal release time, if necessary, to allow ICE to assume custody. Legislative votes included a 66 to 45 count in the House for one measure, and Republicans noted they are one seat short of a veto-proof majority.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame North Carolina’s GOP immigration bills as a harsh "crackdown" that vilifies immigrants and intimidates communities, employing charged terms like "sell a lie" to depict Republican motives as politically deceptive.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right use "crackdown" but embraces it with a law-and-order tone emphasizing enforcement and protection of taxpayer resources, portraying the legislation as a necessary defense against illegal immigration.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

24 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • North Carolina Republicans have approved two bills aimed at enhancing immigration enforcement, directing state agencies to cooperate with federal authorities like Immigration and Customs Enforcement .
  • One bill expands the responsibilities of jail administrators concerning defendants’ legal residency.
  • This legislation builds on a previous law, mandating jails to detain certain defendants for ICE pick-up.
  • The GOP's actions coincide with President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles amid protests regarding federal sweeps.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Tuesday, the North Carolina Senate passed House Bill 318, legislation that requires local law enforcement to notify federal immigration authorities about certain detainees, and has now been sent to Gov. Josh Stein for his decision to sign or veto.
  • Republican lawmakers pushed the bill to strengthen cooperation between local sheriffs and ICE amid concerns about immigrant crime and resource use, despite Democratic opposition.
  • HB 318 mandates notifying ICE when detainees with felony or Class A1 misdemeanor charges are released and requires judges to assess immigration status, expanding earlier requirements.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™