‘Impossible to cancel’: FTC sues LA Fitness over cancellation requirements


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Legal action

The Federal Trade Commission sued LA Fitness and other gyms over allegedly difficult cancellation policies.

Goal

The FTC is seeking a court order to prevent difficult cancellation policies. It also asked for compensation for the gyms’ customers.

Response

Fitness International, which operates LA Fitness, contends it has an online option for cancellation and is confident it will prevail in court.


Full story

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued LA Fitness and other gyms on Wednesday, claiming they force consumers to go through hoops to cancel their memberships. The lawsuit against Fitness International and Fitness & Sports Clubs seeks more straightforward cancellation policies.

Fitness International operates franchises including LA Fitness, Esporta Fitness, City Sports Club and Club Studio.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Christopher Mufarrige, director of the commission’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, shared a statement regarding the suit, saying: “The FTC’s complaint describes a scenario that too many Americans have experienced — a gym membership that seems impossible to cancel.”

“Tens of thousands of LA Fitness customers reported difficulties. Cancellation was often restricted to specific managers who were often not present or available,” Mufarrige said. “The FTC will not hesitate to act on behalf of consumers when it believes companies are stifling consumers’ ability to choose which recurring charges they want to keep.”

The FTC said the gyms listed in the lawsuit have more than 3.7 million members at more than 600 locations nationwide.

‘Illegally charged hundreds of millions of dollars’

The lawsuit targets specific cancellation practices. It states that members must visit their gym’s website and print out a form using a login that is rarely used otherwise. Then, the FTC says, members must mail the form in with paid postage. The other option is to hand the form to a specific employee or manager designated to perform the procedure.

As a result, these gyms have “illegally charged hundreds of millions of dollars in unwanted recurring fees.”

The FTC is requesting a court order to block hard-to-cancel policies at the gyms. The suit also seeks monetary compensation for customers.

Fitness International responds to allegations

Jill Hill, president of club operations at Fitness International, shared a news release in response to the suit. She said the lawsuit’s accusations are “without merit.” 

She said Fitness International began an online cancellation alternative more than a year and a half ago. However, she noted most memberships are initiated in person. 

“Members also have always had the option to cancel in person at any club, or by mail. Those who wish to do so can and do cancel in such fashion,” Hill said.

“We remain confident that we will prevail in court,” she added.

What happened to ‘click to cancel?’

During the Biden administration, the FTC adopted a “click-to-cancel” rule that was intended to make cancelling a subscription or membership as easy as it was to sign up.

Last month, however, days before the rule was scheduled to take effect, a federal appeals court struck down the regulation. The court said the FTC had failed to analyze the rule’s cost and benefits.

Alan Judd (Content Editor), Julia Marshall (Morning Digital Producer), and Ian Kennedy (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags:

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The FTC lawsuit against Fitness International highlights concerns over consumer rights and business practices related to the difficulty of canceling gym memberships, potentially affecting millions and prompting scrutiny of recurring fee policies.

Consumer protection

The story underscores issues faced by consumers who report difficulties in canceling memberships, as stated by the FTC, raising broader questions about fair treatment and transparency in service agreements.

Corporate practices

The lawsuit focuses on the business practices of major gym chains, questioning whether procedures and fees involved in cancellations are reasonable and lawful, as challenged by federal regulators.

Regulatory oversight

The situation occurs amid evolving federal oversight, including the FTC's attempt to adopt a 'click-to-cancel' rule, demonstrating the ongoing tension between regulatory agencies and service providers regarding consumer rights.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 86 media outlets

Community reaction

Many local consumers and advocacy groups have expressed frustration over the reported hurdles to canceling memberships, as reflected in the tens of thousands of complaints noted by the FTC. This has raised broader discussions around transparency and fairness in subscription services.

History lesson

The FTC and other regulators have previously targeted various subscription-based companies for similar practices, including gyms and media, indicating an ongoing concern over opaque or complex consumer cancellation methods.

Policy impact

If the FTC succeeds, the case could set a legal precedent for the cancellation practices of gyms and other subscription-based businesses, potentially making membership cancellations easier for consumers nationwide.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left paint LA Fitness’s cancellation policies as deliberately burdensome and opaque, using emotionally charged terms like “exceedingly difficult” and “illegally charging” to emphasize consumer exploitation and advocate for government intervention.
  • Media outlets in the center adopt a more clinical tone, focusing on staff training to deny cancellations and rebilling practices — details de-emphasized on the left — while avoiding heightened rhetoric.
  • Media outlets on the right amplify this framing with phrases such as “hostage-style gym memberships” and “maze of obstacles,” employing vivid, provocative language that simultaneously critiques corporate practices and implies government overreach, often specifying legal violations to underline alleged wrongdoing.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

86 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is suing Fitness International, operator of LA Fitness, for making it "exceedingly difficult" to cancel gym memberships and related services.
  • The FTC claims that customers face cumbersome cancellation processes, resulting in "hundreds of millions of dollars in unwanted recurring fees."
  • According to the FTC, the gym's cancellation methods include in-person or mail options, which are "opaque, complicated, and demanding."
  • The FTC seeks a court order to stop the alleged unfair practices and refund harmed consumers, as stated by Christopher Mufarrige.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Federal Trade Commission is suing the operators of LA Fitness for making it exceedingly difficult for customers to cancel memberships and services, as stated by Christopher Mufarrige, director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection.
  • Tens of thousands of LA Fitness customers reported challenges in cancellation, including limited hours for cancellations and the need to meet specific managers who were often unavailable.
  • Customers who attempted to cancel were often rebilled under new account numbers, with LA Fitness allegedly training staff to deny cancellation requests made by phone or email.
  • The FTC seeks to bar the companies from these practices and secure refunds for affected consumers through the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against LA Fitness, accusing it of making the cancellation of gym memberships excessively difficult for consumers, violating federal laws.
  • LA Fitness allegedly forces members to cancel in person or via mail, creating complications and additional costs for consumers, according to the FTC.
  • The lawsuit seeks to halt LA Fitness's practices and demands refunds for customers who faced difficulties when attempting to cancel their memberships.
  • Christopher Mufarrige, the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection director, stated that members face unnecessarily complicated cancellation methods, which violate consumer rights.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.