In Big Bend, new border construction raises fears over light pollution and wildlife


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

As the Trump administration moves forward with its $46.5 billion effort to expand the border wall between the U.S. and Mexico, contractors have begun bulldozing parts of Big Bend National Park in Texas. 

Since the plan to build portions of the wall within the park was announced, residents and organizations have raised concerns about protecting dark skies, native wildlife and the surrounding natural ecosystem.

Despite concerns, however, bulldozers arrived on the scene last week.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™

Point phone camera here

Border wall in Big Bend

The Washington Post reported heavy machinery arrived in the park last week and began clearing a path for a future patrol road that will run the length of the park. 

Photos from The Post show equipment leaving large tire treads along the terrain, while native animals wander past. 

This expansion initiative includes the deployment of new surveillance technology like cameras and sensors in the park, along with the patrol road and 17 miles of vehicle barriers, standing at 4-6 feet high. 

The plan, however, does not call for a 30-foot wall, like the ones being erected along other parts of the border. 

Concern for wildlife, the ecosystem

Those animals and the fact that Big Bend is their native habitat have sparked concern within the Texas Chapter of Backcountry Hunters & Anglers (BHA)

In March, the group issued a statement saying it has “significant concerns” about the border wall, and “the subsequent impacts to our North American heritage of hunting and fishing in a natural setting.”

BHA says the proposed wall would block native wildlife from accessing the Rio Grande and block critical pathways for black bears, mountain lions, bighorn sheep and more. 

“It would block popular hiking trails, and it would permanently scar the beautiful Santa Elena and Boquillas Canyons,” BHA added. “It would close off access to nearly 200 miles of the Rio Grande for American paddlers, river guides, anglers, land stewards, and sightseers — from Big Bend National Park to Amistad National Wildlife Refuge.” 

Dark sky concerns

Residents in portions of West Texas have also raised concerns over what the new surveillance could do to their dark skies. 

The Big Bend region of Texas is full of dark sky defenders, residents who regularly fight against threats like bright store signs and headlights. They say part of their concerns stem from tourism — people visit Big Bend to look at the stars, and if light pollution comes in, it may no longer be worth the trip. 

And it’s not just the residents. In 2012, Big Bend National Park was certified as the region’s first dark sky site, and remains the largest, offering the least light pollution of any national park in the lower 48 states. 

With the certification come strict outdoor lighting rules, lighting management plans and regional ordinances that protect the dark sky for science and wildlife. 

How many border crossings happen in Big Bend? 

The Trump administration is expanding its border wall into Big Bend after the area saw a significant drop in crossings in 2025. 

According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, there were 3,096 apprehensions in 2025, down from more than 11,000 in 2023. 

The sector covers about 26% of the U.S.-Mexico border length, but accounts for just 1.3% of undocumented crossings, according to The Texan.    

Other border wall implications across the US

The Big Bend portion of the border wall isn’t the only section receiving criticism. Earlier this year, construction damaged part of a Native American site in Arizona

And back in June, the Tohono O’odham Nation filed a lawsuit and is seeking an injunction against the department in hopes of halting the project, part of President Donald Trump’s long-promised barricade along the southern border.

Round out your reading

Tags: , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Construction activity has begun inside Big Bend National Park, altering a federally protected natural area that millions of Americans visit and that carries legal designations affecting lighting, wildlife access and recreational use.

Recreational access at risk

According to Backcountry Hunters & Anglers, the project would close off nearly 200 miles of the Rio Grande to paddlers, anglers, river guides and sightseers from Big Bend to Amistad National Wildlife Refuge.

Dark sky rules affected

Big Bend holds a certified dark sky designation with strict lighting ordinances; residents say new surveillance infrastructure threatens the conditions that draw tourists to the region.

Protected land now under construction

Heavy machinery was documented clearing terrain inside the national park last week, marking an active change to a federally protected site regardless of the wall's final design.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Big Bend construction as a “crazed road-building spree,” even “raping and pillaging” public lands, emphasizing environmental damage, low crossing levels, bipartisan opposition, and the reported $1.7 billion cost.
  • Media outlets in the center use technocratic phrases like “border security project,” distinguishing roads, barriers, and surveillance from a 30-foot wall.
  • Media outlets on the right spotlight Cornyn urging DHS to “listen” to Texans, more than 140 concerned businesses and groups, and “record low” crossings—questioning the project’s necessity while still linking it to Trump’s “border wall.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

94 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Federal contractors authorized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection have begun clearing land in Big Bend National Park, Texas, to build new border barriers and infrastructure as part of the Trump administration's border security plans.
  • Environmental groups and local officials have opposed the project, warning it will harm the park's landscape, wildlife habitat, and nearby communities.
  • Local leaders and politicians have called for better communication, coordination, and transparency regarding the project's environmental impact.
  • Despite opposition, lawsuits, and concerns, construction continues under a $1.7 billion contract awarded to Southwest Valley Constructors, with some environmental and archaeological protections waived to proceed.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Trump administration began border wall construction in Big Bend National Park despite opposition from thousands of Texans, including local officials and former National Park Service superintendents.
  • Dozens of waivers signed by DHS officials Kristi Noem and Markwayne Mullin removed protections for wildlife, cultural resources, air, and water quality, allowing construction including barriers, roads, and utility poles in areas with no illegal crossings.
  • Opponents argue that the construction harms wildlife, cultural resources, and public access, while former superintendents say it is unnecessary, devastating, and border security can be improved without destroying the park.
  • Senator John Cornyn urged DHS to meet with Texas stakeholders and address their concerns before continuing construction at Big Bend National and Ranch State Parks due to poor communication and unresolved requests.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™