Independent agency opens investigation into man who prosecuted Trump


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Smith investigation

The Office of Special Counsel (OSC), an independent federal agency, has initiated an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who led federal investigations into Donald Trump.

Political activity allegations

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., requested the OSC investigation into Smith in July, alleging Smith "unlawfully took political actions to influence the 2024 election" and that the investigation was intended to harm Trump, who was then a candidate.

Trump investigations

Smith was appointed special counsel in 2022 and brought two cases against Trump: one alleging conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results and another involving the hoarding of classified documents.


Full story

An independent federal agency has opened an investigation into Jack Smith, the former special counsel who was tasked with investigating President Donald Trump. The investigation comes after Republicans alleged Smith used the investigations to engage in illegal political activity.

On Saturday, the Office of Special Counsel confirmed that it was investigating Smith on the allegations. Smith was named special counsel in November 2022 by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland. Smith’s title is different from the agency now investigating him. The office also doesn’t have criminal enforcement power but it can impose fines and other penalties if it finds any violations.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

What are the allegations against Smith?

In July, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., asked the OSC to look into whether Smith illegally engaged in political activity to influence the 2024 election. In it he said Smith “unlawfully took political actions to influence the 2024 election.” Cotton also said the investigation was to harm Trump, who was a candidate at the time. 

Smith has not responded to Cotton’s allegations. However, he has previously said his investigations were done by the books and followed all legal protocols.

The OSC’s announcement did not state what made Smith’s investigations political in nature. It also doesn’t say how he violated the Hatch Act, the federal law banning certain public officials from engaging in political activity. 

Why was Trump investigated?

More than a year before the 2024 election, Smith brought two cases against Trump. The first accused him of conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election and the other was the hoarding of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate. 

In Smith’s indictments in the two cases, he described Trump’s actions as clear violations of federal law. Garland, who appointed Smith, said the politics never played a role in either of the cases.

What were the results of the investigations?

Despite Smith’s claims of “clear violations,” both cases were abandoned after Trump won re-election in November 2024. Smith cited longstanding Justice Department policy prohibiting the indictment of a sitting president. 

In January, Smith wrote a report that was later partially released. In it, he said he believed he had enough evidence to convict Trump. 

“But for Mr. Trump’s election [in 2024] and imminent return to the presidency, the office assessed that the admissible evidence was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction at trial,” he wrote in the report. 

Smith later resigned after Trump assumed power in January. Trump fired the OSC’s previous chief, Hampton Dellinger, who later sued to return to his position. However, he later abandoned the suit. 

The Senate panel has not yet considered Trump’s replacement for the role. Trump nominated former right-wing podcast host Paul Ingrassia. The panel was set to consider the nomination in July but it was pulled from the agenda. 

Trade Representative Jamieson Greer is serving as acting head of the office.

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don't just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

An independent federal agency is investigating special counsel Jack Smith after allegations from Republicans of illegal political activity during investigations related to President Donald Trump, raising questions about the boundaries between legal and political processes.

Political investigations

The investigation into Jack Smith highlights concerns over the potential politicization of legal proceedings, particularly when related to high-profile political figures such as the president.

Legal accountability

Allegations against Smith center on whether prosecutors can be held accountable under laws prohibiting political influence, emphasizing the importance of legal standards for public officials.

Impact on elections

The case involves questions about the timing and nature of investigations during an election cycle and their potential to influence the outcome or perception of elections.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 343 media outlets

Context corner

The Hatch Act, which is central to this investigation, is a federal law from 1939 that restricts federal employees' participation in certain political activities to ensure the nonpartisan administration of government functions.

Debunking

Multiple sources state that, as of now, there is no public evidence presented demonstrating Jack Smith violated the Hatch Act and opinions about politicization come primarily from Smith's critics.

Oppo research

Opponents of Jack Smith, notably Republican Sen. Tom Cotton and other Trump allies, argue Smith's legal moves were attempts to interfere with the 2024 election and have pushed for formal investigations or consequences.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don't just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the investigation into Jack Smith as a politically motivated retaliation, emphasizing Smith’s procedural independence and highlighting how the Office of Special Counsel , now led by a Trump appointee with a stalled confirmation, may be weaponized by Trump allies.
  • Media outlets on the right portray Smith as a partisan “Biden DOJ prosecutor” whose “rushed trial” and “illegal campaign activity” aimed to undermine Trump’s 2024 bid, using charged terms like “political actor masquerading as a public official” to cast doubt on his legitimacy.
  • Media outlets in the center maintain a neutral tone, focusing on factual details of the OSC’s investigatory role and absent overt partisan framing.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets on the right to provide a bias comparison.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

343 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The U.S. Office of Special Counsel is investigating Jack Smith for alleged violations of the Hatch Act, following accusations from President Donald Trump and Sen. Tom Cotton, who claimed his inquiries into Trump were politically motivated.
  • Cotton has accused Smith of using his position inappropriately, alleging that his actions were intended to influence the 2024 election.
  • The OSC, an independent agency, can recommend disciplinary actions but lacks criminal prosecution power, as confirmed in its investigation announcement to NBC News.
  • The OSC is proceeding with the inquiry following Cotton's request.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Saturday, the Office of Special Counsel confirmed to The Associated Press it opened an investigation into former special counsel Jack Smith for allegedly violating the Hatch Act.
  • Following Republican pressure, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., asked the OSC on Wednesday to probe Smith, alleging political bias.
  • Long ago, Smith led two criminal cases against President Donald Trump over classified documents and election interference, which he dropped after Trump was reelected.
  • The OSC clarified this inquiry is not criminal in nature but may refer its findings to the Justice Department for review.
  • This inquiry adds to measures Trump and his allies have used against perceived political enemies, following other actions targeting critics.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Office of Special Counsel has opened an investigation into Jack Smith over allegations of political conduct related to his probes of President Donald Trump.
  • Sen. Tom Cotton stated that Smith's actions were driven by a political agenda to harm Trump's election bid.
  • The Hatch Act Unit is reviewing whether Smith violated federal law by engaging in political activities while serving as Special Counsel.
  • Smith has not publicly commented on the investigation and maintains that his actions followed legal protocols.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™