Indiana map redraw stalls for lack of GOP lawmaker support


Summary

Indiana redistricting halt

According to Indiana Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray, Indiana lawmakers will not move forward with a mid-decade redistricting as there are not enough votes in the Senate to pass the measure.

National redistricting efforts

President Donald Trump has encouraged states, including Indiana, to redraw congressional maps to favor Republicans.

State-level reactions

Gov. Mike Braun of Indiana criticized the decision not to redistrict, stating, "state senators need to do the right thing." He argued that Hoosiers deserve fair maps to combat alleged Democratic gerrymandering.


Full story

After a private vote and months of discussion, Indiana lawmakers said they won’t have enough votes to accomplish a mid-decade redistricting. President Donald Trump for months has pushed Indiana and other states to redraw maps that are more favorable to Republicans.

The White House has told Indiana lawmakers to meet with the president in the Oval Office as early as next week to discuss the next steps. Indiana is one of four states where Republican redistricting efforts have stalled.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

What happened in Indiana?

Indiana Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray announced Friday he would not convene lawmakers in December to vote on the measure. He said this wasn’t a decision made lightly and came after months of “thoughtful consideration.”

“Over the last several months, Senate Republicans have given very serious and thoughtful consideration to the concept of redrawing our state’s congressional maps,” Bray said in a statement. “Today, I’m announcing there are not enough votes to move that idea forward, and the Senate will not reconvene in December.”

Republican Gov. Mike Braun criticized the announcement, saying state senators “need to do the right thing.”

“I called for our legislators to convene to ensure Hoosiers’ voices in Washington, D.C., are not diluted by the Democrats’ gerrymandering,” the governor said in a statement. “Our state senators need to do the right thing and show up to vote for fair maps. Hoosiers deserve to know where their elected officials stand on important issues.”

Trump had wanted lawmakers to create a map where all nine districts had a GOP edge. The current map, drawn by Republicans in 2021, holds a 7-2 Republican majority. 

According to the Indiana Capital Chronicle, the measure had enough support in the state House to pass, but only 13 of the 40 state senators publicly announced their support of the proposal. At least eight Republican senators publicly opposed it. 

However, Politico reports that the Senate has nearly enough votes to pass the proposal. The source claimed Bray is trying to protect Republicans who may not vote for it. 

What states have voted to redistrict?

While Indiana’s proposal is currently dead, other states have succeeded in Trump’s redistricting goals. In August, Texas lawmakers approved a new map that hands Republicans five GOP-leaning districts. Both Missouri and North Carolina redrew maps that created one additional district each that favors Republicans. Ohio lawmakers also redrew their map, giving Republicans two more districts. 

In a surprise move, a Utah state judge ordered lawmakers to create a map that creates a Democratic-leaning district in the Salt Lake City area. Utah is one of several states with one-party representation in Congress.

Voters in California passed Proposition 50, which approved a map drawn that could allow Democrats to flip five seats. The Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit to stop the redistricting. 

Are other states looking to redraw maps?

Several other states, blue and red, are also trying to redraw maps. 

For Republicans, Florida lawmakers have taken the first step to start redistricting. Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., said they could gain five seats under the new map. However, House Speaker Daniel Perez said that there was “no plan on redistricting right now” when asked on Tuesday, according to Politico. Democratic lawmakers have also proposed a bill to ban partisan mapmaking. 

Republicans in Kansas, another Republican-led state looking to redraw, have said they don’t have enough votes to call a special election for the issue. However, Kansas House Speaker Dan Hawkins said he would take up the issue during the regular session, which begins in January.

Republican efforts in Nebraska have also stalled, with some state lawmakers saying the vote isn’t necessary.

Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said his state’s decision on redistricting would hinge on Indiana. Much like California reacted to Texas’ redrawing, Illinois would react to Indiana’s, Pritzker said. 

“We’re watching what Indiana does,” Pritzker said. “We may have to react to that. It’s certainly something that people have considered here, and the legislature has considered here. But we’ll have to see what happens.”

Illinois’ Black Caucus members have opposed any redistricting that dilutes majority Black and Hispanic districts. 

But other Democratic-led states may go ahead of Illinois. Both Maryland and Virginia have announced efforts. 

In Maryland, Democratic Gov. Wes Moore said on Thursday that the state would try to add one Democratic-leaning seat to its map. Doing so would remove the state’s only Republican member of Congress. 

“If parts of this country are going to go through a mid-decade process to determine whether or not they have fair maps, then so will the state of Maryland,” Moore said.

Democratic lawmakers in Virginia scored a win in early November after a judge denied an effort to block a plan to redraw the state’s congressional map. Lawmakers will vote on the map proposal during the regular session beginning in January. Democrats hold majorities in both chambers of the state legislature and the bill would likely have enough support to pass.

Cole Lauterbach contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

As efforts to redraw congressional maps intensify in multiple states, Indiana lawmakers' decision not to proceed with mid-decade redistricting highlights ongoing partisan debates about legislative power, electoral fairness and political influence in U.S. redistricting processes.

Partisan redistricting

The push and resistance to redraw congressional maps reflects disputes over party control and representation, with both Republican and Democratic leaders seeking maps that potentially benefit their parties.

Legislative division

Diverging support among Indiana lawmakers, and similar divides in other states, illustrate the complexity and contentiousness of reaching consensus on redistricting measures.

National implications

Decisions made in individual states affect national political power dynamics, prompting responses from other states and influencing broader debates about the fairness of the U.S. electoral system.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 23 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Indiana's congressional delegation stands at seven Republicans and two Democrats. Proponents sought to create a map favoring Republicans in all nine districts. A poll cited by Indiana Capital Chronicle found about 51% of voters opposed mid-decade redistricting while 39% supported it.

Community reaction

Many local Indiana officials and advocacy groups applaud the decision to reject mid-decade redistricting, emphasizing a desire to focus on nonpartisan issues such as cost of living rather than partisan power struggles.

History lesson

Mid-decade redistricting is rare and typically controversial. Historical precedent shows that redistricting outside the usual census cycle often leads to heightened political conflict and sometimes legal challenges.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Indiana redistricting decision as a significant defeat for Trump, using terms like "Loses Bigly" and portraying the Senate's action as "defying" or a "roadblock" to his "push" to "rig Congress.
  • Media outlets in the center focus on the procedural outcome, citing "not enough votes" as the reason, and while acknowledging "resisting Trump's calls," it maintains a more neutral, factual presentation.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets on the right to provide a bias comparison.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

78 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Indiana Senate will not vote on redistricting due to a lack of votes, as announced by Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray.
  • President Donald Trump's efforts to pressure Indiana lawmakers for redistricting failed despite support from key state Republicans, including Gov. Mike Braun.
  • Republicans in Indiana canceled a special session called to consider redistricting mid-cycle, marking a defeat for Trump as GOP-run states push for map changes.
  • The rejection of Indiana's redistricting aligns with similar outcomes in other states, showing decreasing support for GOP redistricting efforts amid recent Democratic successes.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Nov 14, Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray announced the Indiana Senate will not reconvene in December due to insufficient votes for mid-cycle redistricting.
  • After months of lobbying from the White House, including Vice President JD Vance's visits and Gov. Mike Braun's special session call last month, Indiana Senate Republicans concluded they lacked enough support.
  • By IndyStar's tally, 13 senators supported redistricting, eight opposed, eight undecided and 11 silent, leaving the measure short of the 25 "yes" votes needed from 40 Republican senators.
  • As a result, Indiana is unlikely to redraw its congressional map before the 2026 midterm elections, with the filing deadline in early February, Braun said, `I called for our legislators to convene to ensure Hoosiers' voices in Washington, DC are not diluted by the democrats' gerrymandering.`
  • Nationally, Indiana is the second Republican-led legislature to drop mid-cycle redistricting plans, dealing a setback to President Donald Trump's campaign as Democrats need three seats to win the House in 2026.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.