International shipping authority agrees to first ever global emissions fee


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • Countries reached a landmark agreement to curb emissions from global shipping, which contributes about 3% of global greenhouse gases. Under the deal negotiated by the UN’s International Maritime Organization, ships must reduce emissions or pay a fee, with the goal of achieving net zero by around 2050.
  • The accord, set to take effect by 2028 pending final approval, introduces the first-ever global carbon price for an industry while funding cleaner fuel transitions and aid for climate-vulnerable nations.
  • There was pushback to the deal, with the United States withdrawing from the negotiations earlier in the week, although no other countries followed its lead.

Full Story

Countries around the world reached an agreement Friday, April 11, to address the environmental impact of shipping, which currently accounts for approximately 3% of global emissions. The deal, negotiated under the authority of the United Nations’ International Maritime Organization (IMO), mandates that ships transporting goods across oceans must either reduce their greenhouse gas output or pay a fee, with the goal of achieving net-zero emissions around 2050. 

How does the IMO’s agreement intend to meet its goals?

This accord is set to take effect in 2028, pending approval at the IMO’s next meeting in October. It marks the first time a global industry is being subjected to a price for its climate pollution regardless of where it operates. The fees collected will largely be used to fund the transition to cleaner fuels within the maritime industry, with some revenue also designated for assisting developing nations vulnerable to climate-related disasters.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Ships using conventional shipping oil will face a higher fee of $380 per metric ton of carbon dioxide emissions, while those using a less carbon-intensive fuel mix will incur a fee of $100 per metric ton. This system is expected to generate between $11 billion and $13 billion annually, according to estimates from the IMO.

What does this mean for global shipping costs?

While the cost implications of these measures for the worldwide shipping industry are currently unclear, previous climate measures from the IMO did raise prices. Analysts determined that a 2020 rule from the organization that regulates the kind of fuel maritime shipping vessels are allowed to use contributed to increased shipping rates that remained elevated for over a year.

How will this impact the US shipping industry?

Notably, the United States withdrew from the talks earlier in the week, though no other nations followed suit. The full implications of the U.S.’s withdrawal remain unclear, with a State Department official only saying that the country did not participate in the negotiations.

What happens next?

This new agreement falls short of the more ambitious goals originally proposed, such as the IMO’s target of a 20% reduction in shipping emissions from these measures, compared to the 5% decrease, which is ultimately expected to be seen from the current deal. However, officials say it is part of broader efforts to meet those long-term goals, and it builds on previous steps toward introducing an industrywide carbon price.

Tags: , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the IMO agreement as a potentially "historic decision" on a "first-ever global fee" targeting "planet-heating emissions" but emphasized its shortcomings, citing concerns about insufficient emission reductions and potential loopholes allowing ships to "pay to pollute," further noting that Pacific Island nations abstained due to inadequacy.
  • Media outlets in the center presented the agreement neutrally, focusing on factual reporting without overt judgment, but did use the term "planet-heating emissions."
  • Media outlets on the right , while reporting the agreement, framed it through skepticism, with one outlet decrying a "UN Shipping Tax" as fueling "global tyranny," while another used the term "fee" instead of "tax," potentially downplaying the financial impact.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

112 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Many countries agreed to impose a minimum fee of $100 per ton of greenhouse gases emitted by ships, marking the first global tax on shipping emissions.
  • Revenue from the fees, estimated at $10 billion to $13 billion annually, will support green shipping initiatives.
  • The agreement, notably without the United States, will be adopted in October and takes effect by 2028.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The International Maritime Organization members agreed on a tax to reduce emissions.
  • Shipping emissions increased, vessels grew, and fuel usage rose over the last decade.
  • The IMO approved a global fuel standard and pricing to cut pollution in shipping lanes.
  • IMO Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez stated, "the group forged a meaningful consensus."
  • The tax, effective by 2028, is $100 per ton; the U.S was noticeably absent.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Many of the world’s largest shipping nations agreed to a minimum tax of $100 per ton of carbon dioxide emitted by ships, effective by 2028, as reported by the International Maritime Organization.
  • The United States did not participate in the negotiations and urged other governments to oppose the greenhouse gas emission measures under consideration.
  • The new tax is intended to encourage shipping companies to adopt zero and near-zero fuel methods and to promote environmental protections, though critiques remain about its effectiveness.
  • Officials like Emma Fenton criticized the tax for not sufficiently addressing emissions or supporting climate-vulnerable countries.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™