Iran activates new nuclear site, warns of missile retaliation


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

IAEA censure

The U.N. nuclear watchdog declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in nearly 20 years. The resolution passed with 19 votes in favor, three against, and 11 abstentions.

Iran’s response

Iran activated a third enrichment facility and began upgrading Fordow with advanced centrifuges. Officials said enriched uranium output will increase significantly.

Political backlash

Iran rejected the IAEA resolution as politically motivated. Tehran insists it remains in compliance with safeguards and denies any material diversion.


Full story

Iran announced new nuclear countermeasures on Thursday, June 12, in response to a resolution passed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The resolution declared that Tehran is non-compliant with its non-proliferation obligations.

The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) confirmed that it has activated a third secure uranium enrichment facility. Iran says replacing its first-generation centrifuges with IR-6 machines at the Fordo Fuel Enrichment Plant will significantly increase the country’s enriched uranium output, both in volume and efficiency. 

According to the AEOI, Iran’s 60% enrichment output has already increased sevenfold compared to earlier cycles, with additional gains expected as new facilities come online.

Spokesperson Behrouz Kamalvandi called the IAEA resolution “coercive and unjust” and said Iran’s response is both strategic and technical.

“The more pressure is applied, the stronger Iran’s response will be,” Kamalvandi said during a visit to the Tehran Research Reactor.

Why did the IAEA issue a resolution against Iran?

The IAEA’s resolution represents the first formal censure of Iran in nearly two decades. Backed by the U.S., U.K., France, and Germany, the resolution cited Tehran’s failure to cooperate on undeclared nuclear material at multiple sites. It passed with 19 votes in favor, three against and 11 abstentions.

Iran rejected the move as politically motivated. Iran’s Foreign Ministry and the AEOI issued a joint statement asserting that Iran has complied with its safeguards obligations and that IAEA reports have found no diversion of nuclear material.

How is the US responding?

President Donald Trump confirmed that the U.S. is withdrawing some diplomatic personnel from Iraq and authorizing military family members to leave multiple posts across the Middle East. The State Department cited “heightened regional tensions,” and the U.S. military said it stands ready to assist with evacuations if needed.

The partial evacuation includes voluntary departures from embassies in Bahrain and Kuwait.

Is Israel preparing to strike Iran?

U.S. and European officials say Israel appears ready to launch an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has urged Trump to act while Iran remains vulnerable. 

Trump previously discouraged military action in favor of nuclear negotiations, but recent developments have reportedly lowered his confidence in reaching a deal.

In response, Iran’s Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh warned of a major retaliation if attacked — including strikes on all U.S. bases in the region using hundreds of ballistic missiles. 

What is the status of US-Iran nuclear talks?

Talks are expected to resume in Oman within days. Iran rejected a recent U.S. proposal to phase out uranium enrichment and is preparing a counteroffer.

Meanwhile, U.S. Central Command leader General Michael Kurilla has postponed his congressional testimony amid the growing crisis. Iran maintains it is not seeking nuclear weapons. Its U.N. mission described recent U.S. military threats as destabilizing, while Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned that further censure by the IAEA would provoke a strong reaction.

Jonah Applegarth (Production Specialist), Kaleb Gillespie (Video Editor), and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer ) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

Iran's response to an International Atomic Energy Agency resolution, including increased uranium enrichment and regional tensions, has heightened concerns about nuclear proliferation and the potential for conflict in the Middle East.

International tensions

The IAEA's formal censure of Iran and moves by the U.S. and allies, including partial evacuations and warnings of possible military action, underscore strained relations and rising instability in the region.

Diplomatic negotiations

Ongoing but stalled nuclear talks, potential counteroffers, and strongly worded responses from multiple governments highlight the challenges and urgency of resolving the crisis through diplomacy.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 44 media outlets

Context corner

The IAEA’s recent censure comes as talks between the U.S. and Iran remain stalled, with tensions mounting since the collapse of the 2015 nuclear deal after the U.S. withdrawal in 2018. Historically, the IAEA last formally censured Iran in 2005, which led to the referral of Iran to the UN Security Council and subsequent international sanctions.

History lesson

The IAEA’s referral of Iran’s case to the UN Security Council in 2005 triggered wide-ranging sanctions and increased pressure on Iran, ultimately leading to the 2015 nuclear deal. That agreement, known as the JCPOA, constrained Iran’s nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. Following the U.S. exit from the deal, Iran has incrementally reduced its cooperation and compliance.

Policy impact

If further UN sanctions are re-imposed, Iran may face renewed economic isolation, affecting its economy and population. Conversely, continued enrichment and international pressure could increase military risks in the region. The situation also impacts global diplomatic negotiations, energy markets, and regional security policies for neighboring states and global powers.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the IAEA’s finding of Iran’s breach of nuclear obligations with a focus on diplomatic complexity and geopolitical nuance, emphasizing Iran’s claims of politicized pressure and retaliatory actions like removing surveillance cameras — terms like “politicized” and “escalatory” reveal a wary but contextual tone.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight non-compliance as a clear-cut security threat, underscoring technical specifics such as uranium enrichment up to 60% purity and potential “breakout time” reduction, often employing urgent language like “DRAMATIC” and “immediately retaliates.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

44 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The United Nations nuclear watchdog declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations, marking a significant finding of non-compliance for the first time in nearly 20 years.
  • Iran announced plans to enhance its nuclear activities after the U.N. resolution was adopted.
  • The resolution received support from 19 nations during the IAEA board meeting but was opposed by only three, with significant abstentions.
  • Iran is increasing its nuclear activities after the U.N. watchdog's resolution declared it in breach of non-proliferation obligations.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The U.N. nuclear watchdog's board of governors found Iran is not complying with its nuclear obligations for the first time in 20 years, a significant development that could heighten tensions and lead to potential sanctions later this year.
  • Nineteen countries on the International Atomic Energy Agency's board voted for the resolution urging Iran to provide answers "without delay" to its investigation of undeclared nuclear sites.
  • Iran's cooperation with the agency has been "less than satisfactory," with uranium traces found at multiple locations prompting concern, according to the U.N. nuclear watchdog.
  • Iran announced plans to establish a new enrichment facility in response to the U.N. findings, stating it will take "specific and effective" actions as a result of the resolution.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™