Jack Smith says Trump knew 2020 election fraud claims were false


Full story

Special counsel Jack Smith’s team shed light on Donald Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election in a newly unsealed court filing. Prosecutors said Trump became “increasingly desperate” as he worked to overturn the results in seven states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. 

The special counsel’s 165-page filing said Trump lied to state election officials, manufactured fraudulent electoral votes and tried to enlist Vice President Mike Pence to obstruct Congress’ certification of the results. Prosecutors said Trump did all that despite acknowledging privately that claims of fraud were not true.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The filing also rebutted an attempt to claim Trump can’t be charged in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity

“Although the defendant was the incumbent President during the charged conspiracies, his scheme was fundamentally a private one,” prosecutors wrote. “Working with a team of private co-conspirators, the defendant acted as a candidate when he pursued multiple criminal means to disrupt, through fraud and deceit, the government function by which votes are collected and counted—a function in which the defendant, as President, had no official role.”

Smith also addressed the Supreme Court’s ruling of presumed immunity regarding Trump’s attempts to pressure Vice President Pence to present alternate electors during the certification process. The justices said that could be subject to a rebuttal, which Smith provided.

“Because the Executive Branch has no role in the certification proceeding—and indeed, the President was purposely excluded from it by design—prosecuting the defendant for his corrupt efforts regarding Pence poses no danger to the Executive Branch’s authority or functioning,” the filing stated.  

Now Judge Tanya Chutkan will decide whether she agrees with Smith’s argument regarding immunity. If she rules against Trump, he will be sure to appeal. If Trump wins the election just over a month away, this case will never go to trial

Tags: , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

6 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

  • No coverage from Center sources 0 sources

Other (sources without bias rating):

  • No coverage from Other sources 0 sources

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.