Judge denies request to stop federal immigration operations in Minnesota


Summary

Federal ruling

A federal judge on Saturday decided against stopping the Trump administration's deployment of thousands of federal immigration agents to the state.

Preliminary injunction

Judge Katherine M. Menendez said plaintiffs' arguments did not meet the burden for a preliminary injunction.

What officials say

Minnesota officials said in their lawsuit that militarized raids are causing fear in their communities. The Department of Homeland Security says its agents are going after those with criminal histories.


Full story

A federal judge on Saturday denied a request by Minnesota officials to temporarily halt the Trump administration’s deployment of thousands of federal immigration agents to the state.

Judge Katherine M. Menendez ruled against granting a preliminary injunction state Attorney General Keith Ellison, and the mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul, are seeking in a lawsuit they filed earlier this month.

She wrote that the court is not deciding on the legality of specific actions taken by federal agents, and it is not making any final determination about the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims at this time. Instead, she said, the court is solely ruling on whether plaintiffs meet the burden for a preliminary injunction.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Around 3,000 federal immigration agents were sent to Minnesota as part of what the federal government is calling “Operation Metro Surge.” Ellison and the mayors’ lawsuit said armed and masked Department of Homeland Security agents are conducting militarized raids in places such as schools, hospitals, job sites and businesses.

Agents appear to be conducting these sweeps and detaining people based on their race and ethnicity, Minnesota officials argued.

“The unlawful tactics used by Defendants’ agents have left members of Plaintiffs’ communities afraid to shop, go to work, attend school, access basic government services, or otherwise live their lives,” the lawsuit says. “They have also resulted in school closures across the Twin Cities due to safety concerns.”

Also causing fear, the lawsuit said, are the recent fatal shootings of Minneapolis residents Alex Pretti and Renee Good by federal immigration agents.

DHS and other Trump administration officials maintain they are going after people with serious criminal histories, and accuse protestors of making threats and causing violence.

Menendez, in her ruling, said the plaintiffs made a strong showing that Operation Metro Surge has had “profound and even heartbreaking consequences on the State of Minnesota, the Twin Cities, and Minnesotans.”

Menendez wrote that the defendants “do nothing to refute the negative impacts” Minnesota officials described.

Still, she wrote, “those are not the only harms to be considered.”  

“The Eighth Circuit has recently reiterated that entry of an injunction barring the federal government from enforcing federal law imposes significant harm on the government,” Menendez said. 

Minnesota officials, she said, did not provide a metric on which to determine “when lawful law enforcement becomes unlawful commandeering.”

“A proclamation that Operation Metro Surge has simply gone ‘so far on the other side of the line’ is a thin reed on which to base a preliminary injunction,” she wrote.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi on X called the judge’s decision “another HUGE” legal win for the Justice Department.

“Neither sanctuary policies nor meritless litigation will stop the Trump Administration from enforcing federal law in Minnesota,” she said.

Straight Arrow News reached out to Ellison’s office for comment.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said on X that local officials are “disappointed,” but “this decision doesn’t change what people here have lived through — fear, disruption, and harm caused by a federal operation that never belonged in Minneapolis in the first place.”

“This operation has not brought public safety. It’s brought the opposite and has detracted from the order we need for a working city. It’s an invasion, and it needs to stop,” he said.

City officials said they will continue to pursue the lawsuit.

Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal judge’s refusal to halt a large-scale federal immigration operation in Minnesota highlights ongoing tensions between state and federal authorities, raising questions about public safety, civil rights and government jurisdiction.

Federal versus state authority

The dispute underscores legal and practical conflicts between Minnesota officials and the federal government regarding the enforcement of immigration law and local autonomy.

Civil rights and community impact

Minnesota officials and community leaders argue federal actions have caused fear, disruption and alleged racial profiling, spotlighting concerns about the rights and well-being of local residents.

Public safety

Federal and local officials offer sharply different perspectives on whether the operation improves or undermines community safety, illustrating broader debates about law enforcement’s role in cities.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

220 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.