Judge indicted for allegedly helping migrant evade ICE arrest in Milwaukee


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Indictment details

Judge Hannah Dugan faces federal charges for allegedly helping a deportable migrant evade ICE agents inside the Milwaukee County Courthouse. She’s accused of obstruction and concealing an individual to prevent arrest.

Courtroom incident

Prosecutors say Dugan directed the migrant and his attorney through a restricted jury door while misleading agents about warrant requirements. The man was arrested shortly after outside the courthouse.

Legal fallout

The Wisconsin Supreme Court suspended Dugan following her arrest. Her case underscores growing tensions over courthouse immigration enforcement under Trump’s broader deportation crackdown.


Full story

A federal grand jury has indicted Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan on charges of obstruction and concealing an individual to prevent arrest. Prosecutors alleged that on April 18, Dugan helped Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, a man facing deportation, avoid arrest by directing him and his attorney to exit through a non-public jury door at the Milwaukee County Courthouse.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan has been indicted on two federal counts: obstruction and concealing an individual to prevent arrest.

Federal agents later apprehended Flores-Ruiz following a foot chase outside the building.

The indictment accused Dugan of misleading federal agents by claiming they needed a judicial warrant rather than an administrative one to take Flores-Ruiz into custody. Dugan allegedly expedited Flores-Ruiz’s case off the record and directed him to leave through a restricted exit while most agents diverted to the chief judge’s office.

What are the specific charges and penalties?

The indictment, issued Tuesday, May 13, by a federal grand jury in Wisconsin, charged Dugan with two federal offenses: obstructing or impeding a proceeding before a U.S. agency and concealing an individual to prevent arrest. These charges carry a combined maximum penalty of six years in prison and up to $350,000 in fines.

Although federal sentencing in nonviolent offenses typically results in shorter prison terms, the legal proceedings remain active. Dugan will enter her plea in U.S. District Court on May 15.

What happened during the incident with Flores-Ruiz?

According to court documents, federal agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrived at the courthouse on April 18 to arrest Flores-Ruiz, who had returned to the United States illegally after his 2013 deportation. He was scheduled to appear in court that day on misdemeanor domestic abuse charges.

The complaint alleges that Dugan’s court clerk was alerted to the agents’ presence by Flores-Ruiz’s attorney, who had photographed members of the arrest team and notified court staff. Dugan then confronted the agents, challenged the validity of their warrant and directed them to the office of the county’s chief judge.

While the agents were away, Dugan allegedly cleared Flores-Ruiz’s hearing and told his attorney he could attend future proceedings via Zoom. The pair exited through a secure door typically used only by staff, jurors and in-custody defendants. However, one federal agent remained nearby and followed them out. Authorities arrested Flores-Ruiz shortly after on a nearby street corner.

What has been the response from officials and the public?

Following Dugan’s arrest on April 25, the Wisconsin Supreme Court suspended her from the bench, citing the need to preserve public confidence in the judiciary. A reserve judge has taken over her duties.

Dugan, who has served as a circuit judge since 2016, maintains her innocence. Her legal team said she looks forward to clearing her name in court.

The case has intensified tensions between local governments and the Trump administration over immigration enforcement. Critics argued that ICE arrests near courthouses deter people from participating in the legal system, especially victims of violence or tenants asserting their rights.

Milwaukee County Board officials passed a nonbinding resolution opposing federal immigration actions in and around local courthouse facilities.

Federal authorities, including the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s Office, defended the arrest strategy, noting that courthouses offer a secure and predictable location to detain individuals without escalating risk.

What happens next in the case?

Dugan will appear in federal court this week for a preliminary hearing. Flores-Ruiz remains in federal custody and awaits a new public defender. No other individuals have been charged in connection with the incident, though multiple court staff and attorneys testified before the grand jury.

U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman will oversee the case going forward.

Jonah Applegarth (Production Specialist), Devan Markham (Morning Digital Producer), and Kaleb Gillespie (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

The indictment of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan raises questions about judicial conduct, immigration enforcement and the balance of authority between local and federal officials within the U.S. legal system.

Judicial integrity

The charges against Judge Dugan highlight concerns about the responsibilities and ethical boundaries of judges in their interactions with law enforcement and the public.

Immigration enforcement

The incident emphasizes ongoing tensions between local governments and federal authorities regarding the location and methods of enforcing immigration law.

Separation of powers

The case brings attention to the challenges in balancing local judicial authority with federal law enforcement actions, especially in cases affecting individuals appearing in court.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 280 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan faces up to six years in prison and fines up to $350,000 if convicted of both federal charges of obstruction and concealing an individual to prevent arrest. According to Associated Press sources, these are the maximum penalties, although sentences for nonviolent offenses are often shorter in practice.

Community reaction

The indictment has led to demonstrations and strong reactions within the legal and immigrant advocacy communities in Milwaukee. According to The New York Times, over 150 former state and federal judges signed a letter condemning Dugan’s arrest as intimidation, while some local activists organized public protests outside the courthouse following her arrest.

History lesson

A similar case occurred in Massachusetts in 2019, where a judge was charged with helping a man evade ICE in her courthouse. That case was ultimately dismissed, reflecting the legal and political complexities of prosecuting sitting judges for actions taken on the bench relating to immigration law enforcement.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the indictment mainly as a politically charged escalation targeting judicial resistance to harsh immigration enforcement, emphasizing immigrant rights by highlighting terms like “obstructing immigration agents” and casting the judge’s actions in a sympathetic light, often downplaying the migrant’s criminal history.
  • Media outlets in the center maintain a procedural and neutral tone, explaining the grand jury’s role and legal ramifications without partisan language.
  • Media outlets on the right adopt a law-and-order tone, stressing the judge’s “helping illegal migrant escape ICE” with emotionally charged language such as “escape” and “illegal,” framing her as obstructing justice and aligning the case with a broader pushback against “woke,” “cancel culture,” and media diversion tactics.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

280 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal grand jury indicted a Wisconsin judge for allegedly helping a man evade immigration authorities, allowing the case against her to continue.
  • Prosecutors charged Hannah Dugan with concealing an individual to prevent arrest and obstruction.
  • Dugan's defense team stated she maintains her innocence and looks forward to being vindicated in court.
  • The Wisconsin state Supreme Court suspended Dugan to preserve public confidence in the judiciary.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A federal grand jury has indicted a Wisconsin judge, allowing charges against her to continue, after she allegedly helped an immigrant evade arrest by immigration agents.
  • Judge Hannah Dugan was allegedly alerted to the agents' presence and became confrontational before ushering the immigrant out of the courtroom through a back door.
  • The state Supreme Court suspended Dugan from the bench, and Democrats accused the Trump administration of trying to make an example of her to chill judicial opposition.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal grand jury indicted Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan on charges of concealing a person from arrest and obstruction of proceedings on May 13, 2025.
  • Dugan allegedly helped an undocumented immigrant evade arrest by escorting him through a private exit in her courtroom on April 18.
  • The Wisconsin Supreme Court temporarily suspended Dugan, stating it was necessary to maintain public confidence in the judiciary during her criminal proceedings.
  • Dugan maintains her innocence and anticipates being vindicated in court; her case has sparked significant public and political debate over immigration policy.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline