Judge orders federal agents in Chicago to use body-worn cameras


Summary

Judge calls hearing on short notice

A U.S. District Court judge in Chicago expressed concern that federal agents in Chicago violated her order banning them from using violence against protestors and journalists.

New order in place

The judge released a follow-up order, mandating that federal agents use body-worn cameras. She also required them to be turned on while agents were working.

Other legal battles over deployment

Another judge’s temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops in Chicago expires Saturday as the administration files an appeal.


Full story

A federal judge in Illinois ordered federal agents to use body-worn cameras to record all encounters with immigration protesters in the Chicago area. She issued the order after expressing “serious concerns” over whether federal law enforcement agents in Chicago are following her earlier order to avoid violent clashes with protesters and journalists.

“I’m a little startled frankly, that since Thursday when I entered the [temporary restraining order] last week, I’m getting images and seeing images on the news, in the paper, reading reports, where at least from what I’m seeing, I’m having serious concerns that my order’s being followed,” US District Court Judge Sara Ellis said.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

An attorney for the federal government present at the hearing said “one-sided and selectively edited media reports” were to blame for the images Ellis referenced, according to The Associated Press.

In Thursday’s hearing, Ellis also requested that the field director in charge of the Chicago-area deployment known as Operation Midway Blitz appear in court on Monday to discuss why agents are using tear gas and why they gave no warning before deploying the gas.

Federal deployments in Chicago

The Trump administration initially deployed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to Chicago in September to “target criminal illegal aliens terrorizing Americans in sanctuary Illinois.” At the time, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, both Democrats, said they received no notice that immigration officials would be coming into the city.

In early October, a group of Chicago-based media outlets, journalists and protesters filed a civil rights lawsuit against the Trump administration. They alleged that ICE agents displayed excessive use of force to block them from protesting at an ICE detention facility.

“Never in modern times has the federal government undermined bedrock constitutional protections on this scale or usurped states’ police power by directing federal agents to carry out an illegal mission against the people for the government’s own benefit,” that lawsuit said.

Around the same time, the state of Illinois sued the Trump administration to block President Donald Trump’s attempt to deploy National Guard troops to Chicago. A federal judge temporarily blocked that deployment on Oct. 9, but allowed the Illinois National Guard to remain under federal control. That order will remain in effect until Saturday.

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal judge's order requiring federal agents in Chicago to wear body cameras during interactions with immigration protesters highlights concerns about law enforcement accountability and the protection of constitutional rights in protest settings.

Law enforcement accountability

The judge's decision responds to concerns about whether federal agents are following orders to prevent violence, focusing on transparency and oversight during protests.

Civil rights and protests

The civil rights lawsuit and judicial actions underscore ongoing debates about government conduct and the protection of protesters' and journalists' constitutional rights.

Federal and state authority

Disputes between federal and local officials over immigration enforcement and deployment of federal resources raise complex issues about jurisdiction and states' rights.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

132 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.