Judge orders reinstatement of professor suspended over Charlie Kirk comments


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Ruling

A federal judge has ruled that a University of South Dakota professor must be reinstated following his suspension over comments he made online on Charlie Kirk.

Finding

The judge found that the professor’s speech was protected because he posted the comments while in the privacy of his own home and was not performing work duties.

Criticism

Republicans have criticized the professor’s comments, and many have called for his termination.


Full story

A federal Judge temporarily reinstated a University of South Dakota art professor on Wednesday after the school placed him on administrative leave following a negative social media post about Charlie Kirk. The professor referred to Kirk as a “hate-spreading Nazi” the same day the conservative activist was assassinated on a Utah college campus.

The judge ordered the school to halt all efforts to fire professor Phillip Michael Hook, according to court documents obtained by The Washington Post.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The post at the center of the case

“I’m sorry for his family that he was a hate spreading Nazi and got killed,” Hook’s post from Sept. 10 reportedly read. “I’m sure they deserved better.” 

The tenured professor also asked why there had not been more outrage about the fatal shooting of Democratic Minnesota state lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband earlier this summer. 

According to The Post, in a follow-up post the same day, Hook apologized to “those who were offended” and said he removed his previous post.

Numerous firings and suspensions in wake of Kirk’s death

In the wake of Kirk’s killing, numerous companies and academic institutions have terminated or placed employees on leave over remarks they made about the assassination.

Hook’s post sparked criticism from Republicans, including South Dakota Gov. Larry Rhoden and South Dakota House Speaker Jon Hanse. 

The university and South Dakota’s Board of Regents reported receiving “hundreds of calls and message[s]… calling for the removal of Professor Hook.”

Letter sent to Hook

Hook subsequently received a notification from the dean of the university’s College of Fine Arts, Bruce Kelly, informing him that the school was seeking to suspend and then fire him over his comments about Kirk.

The professor filed a lawsuit this week that requested a judge temporarily block the university’s disciplinary action. He alleged the school’s effort was an unconstitutional attack on free speech and violated Hook’s First Amendment rights.

The judge’s order

U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier ruled that even though the professor is a public employee, he made his comments as a private citizen about a subject of public concern. She cited that Hook had written the Facebook post in the privacy of his own home while off of work, which legally protected his speech under the First Amendment. 

Now, the school will be forced “to temporarily set aside their determination to place Hook on administrative leave” and “reinstate Hook’s position as a Professor of Art at the University of South Dakota” until at least Oct. 8, when a court hearing on the matter is set to take place, according to court documents.

Neither Hook nor the South Dakota Board of Regents, which oversees the university, has have yet to comment on the ruling. 

Meanwhile, students have created an online petition calling on state officials to reinstate Hook. It has garnered thousands of signatures.

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal judge's ruling on the reinstatement of a professor after social media comments about Charlie Kirk highlights debates over free speech rights for public employees and the limits of institutional disciplinary actions.

First Amendment rights

The case underscores how free speech protections apply to public university employees and what constitutes speech as a private citizen on matters of public concern.

Academic freedom

The incident raises questions about the boundaries of academic expression, university responses to controversial speech, and protections for tenured faculty members.

Public backlash and institutional response

Widespread public and political reactions influenced the university’s actions and reflect ongoing tensions regarding speech, social media, and professional consequences in academic environments.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.