Judge rules resentencing hearings for Menendez brothers can proceed


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • A judge ruled Friday that resentencing hearings for Erik and Lyle Menendez can move forward. Convicted in 1996 for murdering their parents, the brothers submitted new evidence last year alleging long-term abuse.
  • Former L.A. District Attorney George Gascón supported resentencing. However, current DA Nathan Hochman attempted to withdraw the request, citing the brothers’ lack of accountability –– a motion that Judge Michael Jesic denied.
  • Hearings are set for April 17 and 18, with clemency also under review by the state parole board.

Full Story

Resentencing hearings for Erik and Lyle Menendez can move forward, a judge ruled Friday, April 11.

The Menendez brothers are currently serving life in prison for the 1989 murder of their parents inside their Beverly Hills home. After two trials, the brothers were convicted in 1996 and sentenced to life in prison.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

New evidence raises abuse allegations

In the fall of last year, 35 years after the killings, the brothers submitted new evidence they argued could prove their father sexually, physically and emotionally abused them.

The brothers said they killed their parents in self-defense, claiming they believed their parents were going to kill them the night they carried out the brutal murders.

Controversy over resentencing request

Weeks after that, new evidence was submitted, and shortly before the November election, then-Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascón requested the resentencing. However, he lost reelection to current District Attorney Nathan Hochman.

Last month, Hochman announced he was filing a motion to withdraw Gascón’s resentencing request for the brothers. Hochman cited reasons for withdrawing the request, arguing the brothers were lying about why they killed their parents.

“In looking at whether the Menendez brothers have exhibited full insight and complete responsibility for their crimes, they have not. They don’t meet the standards for resentencing. They don’t meet the standards for rehabilitation,” Hochman said, adding that the brothers needed to come clean and take full responsibility for their criminal actions.

Judge rejects motion to withdraw request

Judge Michael Jesic handed the brothers a win on Friday and ruled against Hochman, allowing their resentencing hearings to proceed.

The brothers’ lawyer, Mark Geragos, reacted to the judge’s decision outside the courtroom Friday afternoon.

“I don’t want to get ahead of myself, but today is a good day. Justice — justice won over politics. It’s been a long time coming. For anybody who was in the courtroom, it was very difficult to sit and listen to what we witnessed, and we are obviously very thankful to the judge.”

Geragos added, “I couldn’t be prouder of representing this family. They’ve waited a long time to get some justice. And today was actually probably the biggest day since they’ve been in custody.”

What’s next in the case

Hochman also reacted to the judge’s decision, saying the brothers will have to prove they can meet the standard of rehabilitation and don’t pose an unreasonable danger to society.

Their hearings are scheduled for Thursday, April 17, and Friday, April 18.

If the brothers are not resentenced, they do have another avenue to freedom—they’ve asked California Gov. Gavin Newsom to grant them clemency. The state parole board is reviewing their case, with hearings scheduled for June.

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the Menendez brothers' resentencing effort as a positive step, emphasizing words like "effort" and "prevail," potentially evoking sympathy and underscoring due process.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right , while neutrally reporting the legal update, highlighted the phrase "score major victory," suggesting a win for the brothers, while also reminding readers of the brothers' initial attempts to mislead investigators and their subsequent spending spree.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

108 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A judge ruled that Erik and Lyle Menendez can proceed with resentencing hearings, rejecting the Los Angeles district attorney's attempt to withdraw the motion for reconsideration of their life sentences after 30 years in prison.
  • The brothers were convicted of the 1989 murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, with their defense arguing self-defense due to past abuse while prosecutors claimed financial motives.
  • The resentencing hearings are set for April 17, while California Gov. Gavin Newsom stated the brothers will appear before a parole board June 13.
  • The Menendez family's legal team argues that Erik and Lyle have taken responsibility for their actions and are deserving of a chance at rehabilitation, opposing objections that they lack sufficient insight.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A judge ruled that Erik and Lyle Menendez's resentencing hearings can continue, despite opposition from Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman, who sought to withdraw the request for resentencing.
  • The brothers were originally sentenced to life without parole for the 1989 murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, when they were ages 18 and 21.
  • Prosecutor Habib Balian argued that Hochman's resentencing petition did not fully address rehabilitation and was based on greed, while the defense claimed self-defense due to years of abuse.
  • The court is scheduled to finalize the brothers' resentencing decision after hearings on April 17 and 18, before the state parole board's final recommendation in June.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.