Judge sides with New Hampshire bakery over town in mural lawsuit


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Judge rules against town

A New Hampshire federal judge sided with a local bakery in its fight against the town of Conway over a mural of the pastries it sells, which the town claimed violated its ordinances.

Art or advertising?

The city’s ordinance addresses outdoor advertising, limiting the size and other details. Town authorities deemed the mural an advertisement that was several times larger than what is permitted.

Judge cites double standard

The judge took issue with the double standard that zoning officials applied to the bakery compared to other businesses, as the town had previously granted other displays that advertised business' services.


Full story

Those who have said “you can’t fight City Hall” must not have been selling baked goods. A New Hampshire federal judge sided with a local bakery in its fight against the town of Conway over a mural of the pastries it sells.

District Judge Joseph Laplante ruled Monday, May 19, that Leavitt’s Bakery owner Sean Young’s 90-square-foot mural above his bakery is constitutionally protected free speech that can’t be stifled by the town’s zoning laws. The mural was painted by local students in 2022.

“This is a major win for public art and First Amendment rights,” the bakery said in a statement posted to Facebook. 

The city’s ordinance addresses outdoor advertising, limiting the size and other details. Town authorities deemed the mural an advertisement that was several times larger than what is permitted. 

Young sued in 2023 after facing misdemeanor charges and fines once his appeals ran out.

The ruling

Laplante’s ruling doesn’t strike down the town ordinance, dispute that the sign is commercial speech, or that the town violated the owner’s First Amendment right to freedom of speech. It does rule that the town’s application of the ordinance to the mural “does not withstand any level of constitutional scrutiny.”

Laplante noted that the city “conducted themselves conscientiously and in good faith in managing town business.”

Double standard

The town argued that the mural didn’t adhere to town zoning laws regarding size or content in outdoor signage, meant to preserve driver safety and town aesthetics. The judge took issue with the double standard that zoning officials applied to the bakery compared to other businesses. The town had previously granted other business displays that advertised the services they offered.

One local ice cream shop was allowed to have garbage cans shaped like ice cream cones. Another variance was given to the Mt. Washington Observatory for its window coverings detailing the inside of the observatory. 

At one point, Young asked the zoning official if the image would be classified as a painting if he wrote, “The Town of Conway hates the Kennett High School art students.” The town employee said that the hypothetical change would be enough to classify the mural as art and not run afoul of the signage rules.

Young asked for $1 in damages. 

Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

A federal court ruling that a New Hampshire bakery's mural is protected free speech highlights ongoing legal debates about the balance between local regulations and constitutional rights.

First Amendment rights

The ruling establishes that artistic and commercial expression on private property may be protected under the First Amendment, even when regulated by local ordinances.

Local government regulation

The case illustrates the challenges municipalities face when enforcing zoning and signage laws, especially when their application potentially conflicts with individual or business rights.

Equitable enforcement

Judge Laplante questioned the town's consistent application of its ordinances, emphasizing the importance of fair treatment for all businesses under local regulations.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 46 media outlets

Community reaction

Many local residents and community members expressed support for the mural and the bakery owner, emphasizing pride in student artwork and its contribution to community identity. As reported in multiple sources, residents described the town's approach as sending a negative message to students and celebrated the ruling as a positive win for the community and free expression.

Do the math

The size limit for signs in Conway is 22 square feet, but the mural measured roughly 90 square feet –– about four times as large as permitted. The bakery owner, seeking only $1 in damages, framed the legal challenge as a matter of principle rather than material compensation, underscoring the symbolic nature of the conflict.

History lesson

The regulation of commercial speech and signage has a longstanding legacy in American law. Previous Supreme Court decisions, such as the 1980 Central Hudson case, distinguish commercial from political or artistic speech and allow more regulation of the former. Similar disputes elsewhere have often prompted communities to revisit and clarify their local sign ordinances.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

46 total sources

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™