Judge to decide whether Trump admin can ban int’l students from Harvard


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Harvard challenges ban

A hearing on June 16 will determine whether to permanently block a Trump-era proclamation that bans international students from entering the U.S. to attend Harvard. A temporary restraining order is currently in place.

Administration's arguments

The Trump administration claims Harvard failed to protect Jewish students and withheld information about foreign students, citing ties to foreign governments. Harvard has denied all allegations.

Federal funding

Harvard is pursuing a separate lawsuit over the freezing of more than $2 billion in federal funding, arguing the administration bypassed legal requirements. A court date is set for July 21.


Full story

A hearing is scheduled for Monday, June 16, involving a declaration that blocks international students from entering the country to attend Harvard University. On June 5, Judge Allison D. Burroughs issued a temporary restraining order against the ban. On Monday, Burroughs will decide whether to block the proclamation indefinitely.

The Trump administration has said that it is punishing Harvard because it has failed to keep Jewish students safe by allowing antisemitic behavior on its campus. Harvard has denied the accusations.

The latest proclamation cited national security concerns and accused Harvard of failing to comply with federal requests for information about foreign students. The White House claimed Harvard withheld data on illegal or violent activity and has financial ties to foreign governments, including China. 

The proclamation suspended the issuance of new student and exchange visitor visas for individuals intending to attend Harvard, and authorized Secretary of State Marco Rubio to evaluate whether to revoke existing visas.

Harvard estimates that visa revocations could affect more than 7,000 international students and recent graduates. The school sued the administration, stating the White House was attempting to bypass earlier court decisions and penalize the school for exercising its First Amendment rights.

In the amended complaint, Harvard wrote that Trump’s proclamation was “a transparent attempt to circumvent the temporary restraining order this Court already entered against the summary revocation of Harvard’s [Student and Exchange Visitor Program] certification.”

Not the first lawsuit

Another lawsuit involving the government and Harvard goes to court on July 21. That case is over the freezing of more than $2 billion in federal funding. Harvard says the Trump administration did not take the necessary steps before canceling its federal funds, prompting a lawsuit.

According to the New York Times, the government began terminating federal funding to Harvard on May 5, starting a 120-day clock, the university wrote in court documents. On June 2, the university filed a motion requesting summary judgment, or a quick victory, no later than early September.

Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

Legal actions over the Trump administration's restrictions on international students and funding at Harvard highlight ongoing debates about academic freedom, government authority and the impact of federal policies on higher education.

Immigration policy

Federal decisions affecting international student visas could disrupt the lives and education of thousands of students, as well as the operations of universities like Harvard.

Academic freedom

Harvard alleges that the government is punishing the university for exercising First Amendment rights, raising questions about the limits of government intervention in academic institutions.

Federal funding and oversight

Disputes over freezing federal funds and demands for information demonstrate tensions between universities and the government regarding compliance, transparency and the consequences of alleged noncompliance.

Timeline

Timeline