- A federal judge has dismissed Consortium News’ $13 million defamation lawsuit against NewsGuard, ruling that the site failed to prove actual malice. The lawsuit stemmed from NewsGuard’s low-reliability rating of Consortium News’ Ukraine-Russia war coverage.
- The judge compared the case to a restaurant critic reviewing a menu without sampling every dish, reinforcing that actual malice requires a higher legal standard.
- NewsGuard welcomed the ruling, maintaining that its rating system is a protected opinion under the First Amendment.
Full Story
A federal judge has dismissed a $13 million defamation lawsuit filed by Consortium News against NewsGuard, a media rating firm that tracks online misinformation.
The lawsuit originated from NewsGuard’s assessment of Consortium News’ reporting on the Ukraine-Russia war. NewsGuard assigned the website a low-reliability score and flagged it with a warning, stating that it failed to meet basic journalistic standards. The site was also labeled as having a “left-wing, anti-U.S. perspective.”
Point phone camera here
Consortium News claimed the rating was defamatory and harmed its reputation. The nonprofit news site argued that NewsGuard did not review enough of its content before issuing the low score.
According to the lawsuit, NewsGuard examined only five articles, while more than 20,000 videos and articles were included in the same assessment.
Judge rules against Consortium News
On Wednesday, March 26, a federal judge ruled that Consortium News failed to provide evidence of actual malice, a key standard in defamation cases.
“Plaintiff’s argument sounds in negligence,” the judge wrote in the ruling. “To accept this theory would be akin to finding actual malice on the part of a restaurant critic who, without trying every dish on a restaurant’s menu, gives the restaurant a negative review based on a few bad meals. Actual malice is a subjective standard.”
Consortium News, founded by investigative journalist Robert Parry, has not yet commented on the decision.
According to Courthouse News Service, NewsGuard co-CEO Gordon Crovitz said Wednesday that the company is “gratified but not surprised” by the court’s ruling.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
NewsGuard’s ratings
NewsGuard’s website explains that it “combines human expertise and technology to provide data, analysis and journalism that helps enterprises and consumers identify reliable information online.”
The firm has given Straight Arrow News a 100 out of 100 reliability rating, affirming its commitment to delivering unbiased and fact-based news.
[Karah Rucker]
A FEDERAL JUDGE HAS DISMISSED A $13 MILLION DEFAMATION LAWSUIT FILED BY CONSORTIUM NEWS AGAINST NEWSGUARD, A MEDIA RATING FIRM THAT TRACKS ONLINE MISINFORMATION.
THE CASE STEMMED FROM NEWSGUARD’S ASSESSMENT OF CONSORTIUM NEWS’ REPORTING ON THE UKRAINE-RUSSIA WAR. NEWSGUARD GAVE THE WEBSITE A LOW RELIABILITY SCORE AND FLAGGED IT WITH A WARNING, STATING IT FAILED TO MEET BASIC JOURNALISTIC STANDARDS –
AND LABELED IT AS HAVING A “LEFT-WING – ANTI U.S. PERSPECTIVE”.
CONSORTIUM NEWS CLAIMED THIS WAS DEFAMATORY AND DAMAGED ITS REPUTATION.
THE NONPROFIT NEWS SITE ARGUED THAT NEWSGUARD DID NOT REVIEW ENOUGH OF ITS CONTENT BEFORE GIVING IT A LOW SCORE.
IT CLAIMED THAT ONLY FIVE ARTICLES WERE EXAMINED, WHILE MORE THAN 20,000 VIDEOS AND ARTICLES WERE LUMPED INTO THE SAME DAMAGING ASSESSMENT.
BUT ON WEDNESDAY, A FEDERAL JUDGE RULED THAT CONSORTIUM NEWS FAILED TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF ACTUAL MALICE—A KEY STANDARD IN DEFAMATION CASES.
THE JUDGE GAVE THIS EXAMPLE IN HER RULING –
Plaintiff’s argument sounds in negligence. To accept this theory would be akin to finding actual malice on the part of a restaurant critic who, without trying every dish on a restaurant’s menu, gives the restaurant a negative review based on a few bad meals. Actual malice is a subjective standard.”
CONSORTIUM NEWS, FOUNDED BY INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST ROBERT PARRY, HAS YET TO COMMENT ON THE RULING.
NEWSGUARD’S CO-CEO SAYS THE COMPANY WAS “GRATIFIED BUT NOT SURPRISED” HE DEFENDED NEWSGUARD’S RATING SYSTEM, CALLING IT A PROTECTED OPINION UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT.
AS WE MENTIONED –
NEWSGUARD “RATES” NEWS AND INFORMATION SITES BASED ON ACCURACY, TRANSPARENCY, AND FACTUAL INFORMATION.
AND NEWSGUARD – RATES STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS – AS HAVING A 100 OUT OF 100 “RELIABILITY RATING” – CONFIRMING THAT OUR NEWS ORGANIZATION ADHERES TO OUR MISSION – OF PROVIDING OUR AUDIENCE “UNBIASED. STRAIGHT FACTS.”
THANKS FOR WATCHING OUR NEWS UPDATE.
FOR MORE STORIES THAT MATTER TO YOU –
DOWNLOAD THE SAN MOBILE APP TODAY.
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Kevin Carter/Getty Images
DHL suspends global shipments of more than $800 to US customers
-
Budrul Chukrut/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
Sensitive docs including WH floor plans shared with thousands: Report
-
FPG via Getty Images
China tests hydrogen-based bomb that burns hotter, longer than TNT
-
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
El Salvador offers prisoner swap to Venezuela involving US deportees
