Jury finds Karen Read not guilty in Boston officer’s death


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Karen Read acquitted of murder

Karen Read was found not guilty of second-degree murder and manslaughter in the 2022 death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe.

Read's supporters

Her supporters, who rallied nationwide, celebrated the verdict, insisting she was framed.

Read's punishment

Read was convicted only of drunken driving and received probation.


Full story

A jury found Karen Read, 45, not guilty of second-degree murder and manslaughter in the January 2022 death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe, 46. The jury deliberated for 22 hours since starting on June 13.

Read’s crowd of supporters erupted with cheers outside the courthouse. Hundreds of people, many of them donning pink, gathered around the courthouse for days since the jury headed in for deliberations. Police officers blocked off the roads and put up barriers between the crowd and the courthouse.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“Free Karen Read, Free Karen Read!” her supporters could be heard chanting.

Nationwide support and fundraising efforts

Read’s supporters created a nationwide presence with merchandise, events, billboards and online platforms. They helped her raise money for her defense after she sold her home and tapped into her retirement to fight the charges. Read’s supporters were adamant that she was a wrongly accused woman caught in a corrupt system.

Read thanked them first when she walked out of the courtroom as a free woman.

“I could not be standing here without these amazing supporters who have supported me and my team financially and, more importantly, emotionally for almost four years,” Read said outside the courthouse. “No one has fought harder for justice for John O’Keefe than I have.”

Second trial ends in acquittal

The verdict comes nearly one year after Read’s first trial, when a judge declared a mistrial after a hung jury.

Read was accused of striking her off-duty police officer boyfriend, O’Keefe, during a snowstorm in January 2022. The two were out drinking that night. Prosecutors alleged she intentionally hit him with her SUV while dropping him off at the house of another Boston police officer for a party. The state claimed she left him outside in a snowstorm, which led to his death.

Defense claimed cover-up by police

Read’s defense team argued that Read dropped O’Keefe off safely at the house and that O’Keefe was attacked or killed inside the house during or after the party. They said he was then dragged outside and staged to make it look like a hit-and-run. Read’s lawyers said the investigators covered up what really happened to protect the other police officers and then framed Read for his death.

According to the Associated Press, O’Keefe’s family bowed their heads after the verdict was read, and prosecutors did not comment on the case.

Verdict and sentencing

The jury acquitted Read of the most serious charges. However, she was found guilty of drunk driving and received one year of probation. She will not serve jail time.

Investigation Discovery produced a docuseries titled “A Body in the Snow: The Trial of Karen Read,” which was released on March 17, 2025.

Harry Fogle (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

The acquittal of Karen Read in the death of her Boston police officer boyfriend highlights concerns about criminal justice processes, allegations of police misconduct, and the divisive impact of high-profile trials on public trust and community perceptions.

Criminal justice process

The case underscores the complexity of the legal system, including issues like mistrials, evidentiary debates, and differing burdens of proof in criminal and potential civil proceedings.

Police conduct and accountability

Allegations from Read's defense of a police cover-up, botched investigations, and misconduct draw attention to public concerns over law enforcement integrity and the importance of transparent investigations.

Public perception and media attention

Widespread public and media interest, as seen through national coverage and vocal demonstrations, reveal how high-profile cases can polarize communities and shape broader discussions about justice, fairness, and institutional trust.

Get the big picture

Behind the numbers

Karen Read’s retrial lasted nearly two months with 31 days of testimony and 49 witnesses testifying. The jury deliberated for approximately 22 hours across four days. Special prosecutor Hank Brennan was paid over $230,000 for the retrial, reflecting the high cost and extensive scope of this legal proceeding for local taxpayers.

Oppo research

Opponents of the acquittal—including O’Keefe’s friends, family, and several trial witnesses—have released public statements condemning the outcome, calling it a result of ‘lies and conspiracy theories.’ They maintain that the investigation was not fundamentally flawed and that justice was not served in O’Keefe’s memory.

Quote bank

“No one has fought harder for justice for John O’Keefe than I have and my team,” said Karen Read to her supporters. Friends of O’Keefe stated, “They have suffered through so much and deserved better from our justice system,” describing the verdict as “a devastating miscarriage of justice.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

206 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™