Jury finds Tesla partially liable in deadly Autopilot crash


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Tesla found liable

A federal jury found Tesla partially liable for a 2019 Autopilot-related crash in Florida that killed one person and injured another.

Tesla to pay damages

The jury assigned Tesla one-third of the blame for the crash, and ordered the company to pay damages.

Trust in Autopilot

The case raises broader concerns about driver over-reliance on Autopilot and the system’s lack of safeguards.


Full story

A federal jury in Florida found Tesla partially liable for a 2019 crash involving its Autopilot system, delivering a major legal setback for the company. On Friday, Aug. 1, jurors ordered Tesla to pay part of the $329 million in damages to the family of a woman who died in the crash and to another person who survived.

The verdict marks one of the first times a jury has held Tesla legally responsible for a crash involving its Autopilot system.

Six years ago in Florida, a Tesla Model S driver using Autopilot crashed into a parked SUV. Investigators said the driver looked down to pick up his phone, took his eyes off the road and hit the vehicle, striking two people who were standing nearby. Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, was killed, and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, was injured. 

Claims against Tesla and the driver

Angulo and Benavides Leon’s family sued Tesla and the driver for allowing its drivers to over-rely on their Autopilot technology. After a three-week trial in Miami, a federal jury found Tesla partially responsible for the 2019 crash. Jurors said the driver or the Autopilot software failed to respond and brake in time. The driver was assigned two-thirds of the blame, while Tesla was held one-third liable.

Following the verdict, Tesla pushed back, calling the jury’s decision “wrong” and warning that it could hinder progress on vehicle safety and the development of life-saving technology. The company said it plans to appeal, citing “substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.” 

Despite the jury assigning most of the blame to the driver, Tesla maintains he was “solely at fault” for the 2019 crash because he was speeding, had his foot on the accelerator, overriding Autopilot, and was distracted while reaching for his phone. 

“This was never about Autopilot,” Tesla said, calling the case “a fiction concocted by plaintiffs’ lawyers blaming the car when the driver — from day one — admitted and accepted responsibility.”

Because Tesla was found legally liable for its share of fault, the company is responsible for paying $243 million in damages. That amount includes both compensatory and punitive damages awarded to the victims and their families.

What Autopilot does — and what it doesn’t

During the trial, the Tesla driver described Autopilot as a “copilot” and said he relied on it to step in if he made a mistake. He testified that the system failed to alert him to the parked SUV or the people nearby and did not brake before the crash.

Tesla’s attorneys argued that the crash was caused entirely by the driver, not the vehicle or its software. In opening statements, attorney Joel Smith said the case wasn’t about Autopilot, but about a distracted and aggressive driver who was looking for his phone and failed to stop before the collision.

Tesla describes Autopilot on its website as a driver-assistance system meant to make driving safer and less stressful, but not fully autonomous. It includes features like Traffic-Aware Cruise Control, which keeps a set speed and distance from the car ahead, and Autosteer, which helps the vehicle stay in its lane.

While Autopilot comes standard on new Teslas, the company says drivers must keep their hands on the wheel and be ready to take control at any moment. Tesla warns that failing to stay alert can lead to serious consequences.

Federal investigators saw a pattern of misuse

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Tesla’s Autopilot combines two features: adaptive cruise control, which keeps a set speed and distance from other cars, and Autosteer, which helps the vehicle stay in its lane. But while Autopilot can steer, brake and accelerate, it’s still a driver-assist tool rather than a self-driving system.

Federal investigators looked at 956 crashes involving Teslas through mid-2023. In about half of those, Autopilot wasn’t in use or the crash wasn’t related. However, patterns emerged in hundreds of other cases, like Teslas hitting objects or veering off roads when drivers were distracted or when Autopilot struggled on slick surfaces.

NHTSA found Tesla’s system gave drivers a false sense of confidence, without enough safeguards to make sure they stayed alert. That mismatch between what the system can actually do and what drivers think it can do led to crashes, including at least 13 fatal ones.

Late last year, Tesla issued a recall for all vehicles with Autopilot, admitting its warnings and controls weren’t strong enough to prevent misuse.

Cassandra Buchman (Weekend Digital Producer ) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The verdict marks a rare legal finding of liability against Tesla for its driver-assistance system and could influence how automakers design and promote semi-autonomous features.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 121 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The jury awarded $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages, holding Tesla responsible for one-third of the compensatory amount, totaling about $43 million, plus the full punitive damages, for approximately $243 million.

Context corner

This is the first case related to a Tesla Autopilot fatal crash to reach trial, with previous lawsuits mostly settled or dismissed. The case occurs as Tesla seeks to expand autonomous vehicle technology and faces increased regulatory scrutiny.

Terms to know

Autopilot: Tesla’s advanced driver-assist system designed to aid with steering, acceleration and braking under driver supervision. Punitive damages: Monetary compensation intended to punish and deter particularly harmful behavior.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left emphasize Tesla and Elon Musk’s role in overstating Autopilot’s safety, framing the $200+ million jury verdict as a corrective blow that exposes corporate recklessness and consumer harm, using charged terms like “deadly crash” and “lulled drivers into a false sense of security.”
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right prioritize the driver’s “reckless” behavior and underscores Tesla’s warnings and partial liability, introducing nuanced critiques of safety features — such as absent geo-fencing and hard-to-find manuals — as systemic issues without fully blaming Musk, often employing cautionary phrases like “opening the floodgates.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

189 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A jury in Miami found Tesla partly liable for a 2019 crash that killed Naibel Benavides Leon and injured Dillon Angulo, awarding $200 million in punitive damages to the plaintiffs.
  • The jury assigned one-third of the blame to Tesla, citing failures in the Autopilot software, which did not brake before the crash.
  • Tesla's Autopilot system, which requires human oversight, has faced criticism for misleading marketing, raising safety concerns among regulators and the public.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal jury in Miami found Tesla partly at fault in a lawsuit over a 2019 Autopilot crash, awarding $329 million in damages to the plaintiffs.
  • The crash occurred in Key Largo, Florida and resulted in the death of 22-year-old Naibel Benavides and injuries to her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo.
  • Plaintiffs claimed that Tesla's driving systems had dangerous defects and that the company misled customers about its safety benefits.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.