Kremlin court sentences 4 Navalny-linked journalists to nearly 6 years in prison


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • Authorities convicted and sentenced four journalists with ties to the late Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny to nearly six years behind bars after finding them guilty of extremism. The journalists maintain their innocence and said authorities targeted them for simply performing their duties as reporters.
  • Some of the journalists freelanced for global publications such as The Associated Press and Reuters.
  • Lawyers for the journalists said they expect to appeal their sentences.

Full Story

A Kremlin court convicted four journalists on Tuesday, April 15, on charges of extremism. The group of journalists reportedly worked for the late opposition leader Alexei Navalny under an anti-corruption organization he founded.

Who are the journalists that authorities convicted?

The journalists convicted include Antonina Favorskaya, Konstantin Gabov, Sergey Karelin and Artyom Kriger, according to multiple reports.

A Moscow district court sentenced each of the four journalists to 5 1/2 years behind bars after finding them guilty of working for Navalny’s Foundation for Fighting Corruption. President Vladimir Putin designated the group as an “extremist” group and “foreign agent.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

According to Reuters, prosecutors accused the journalists of producing content for Navalny’s organization’s YouTube channel, which is outlawed in Russia.

All of those convicted said they are innocent and that Putin targeted them for simply performing their basic duties as journalists.

Are journalists in danger in Russia?

The sentences come as the Kremlin continues its crackdown on voices of opposition, including protesters, journalists and politicians who do not show unwavering support for Putin, especially after Moscow’s war in Ukraine began in February 2022.

CBS News reported that authorities have imprisoned hundreds of people identified as activists, journalists or opposition leaders, and thousands have fled Russia to avoid political persecution.

Favorskaya and Kriger worked for an independent Russian news publication known for covering political activism and political corruption cases.

Gabov worked as a freelance journalist, covering news for international news agencies like Reuters. Karelin also worked as a freelance videographer and has worked with The Associated Press.

One of the journalists’ lawyers said the four would appeal their sentences, calling them “unlawful and unjust.” The defense team further argued that there is “no evidence” to suggest their clients “committed any crimes.”

Who was Alexei Navalny?

Before his death, Navalny was a major critic of Putin. Navalny died in 2024 while serving a nearly 20-year sentence that his supporters said was meant to punish him for his opposition to Putin and his fight against corruption in Russia.

Navalny’s widow, Yulia, reportedly expressed support for the journalists in the wake of their conviction. Through her press secretary, she called for their immediate release and echoed their statements that authorities are punishing them for performing basic journalistic duties.

Why do those convicted believe authorities targeted them?

Favorskaya previously said she believed the Kremlin singled her out because she did a report on the abuse Navalny endured while imprisoned.

Gabov noted in his closing statement that he understood “what kind of country I live in.” He also said that in Russia, the government is equating journalism to extremism.

“Throughout history, Russia has never been different, there is nothing new in the current situation. Independent journalism is equated to extremism,” Gabov said, according to the Novaya Gazeta newspaper.

Tags: , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left emphasize the concision of a severe crackdown on dissent since the Ukraine invasion, framing the trial as politically motivated and unjust.
  • Media outlets in the center present individual statements from the journalists, highlighting their claims without the broader conside, thus appearing less critical of the government.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize external critiques of the trial as an intimidation tactic against the press, introducing a dimension of international concern.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

180 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A Russian court convicted four journalists for extremism tied to Alexei Navalny's anti-corruption group and sentenced them to 5 1/2 years in prison each.
  • The trial occurred amid a severe crackdown on dissent following Russia's military actions in Ukraine since February 2022.
  • All four journalists asserted their innocence, stating they were prosecuted for performing their duties as journalists.
  • The Russian human rights group Memorial recognized the four journalists as political prisoners among over 900 others in detention.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A Russian court sentenced four journalists to prison on Tuesday for extremism.
  • The charges stemmed from their alleged association with Alexei Navalny's organizations.
  • Antonina Favorskaya, Konstantin Gabov, Sergei Karelin, and Artyom Kriger each received a 5 1/2 year sentence.
  • Favorskaya said she was prosecuted for a story on Navalny's abuse; Gabov called the accusations groundless.
  • These sentences are part of a broader crackdown on dissent that intensified after the Ukraine invasion.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Four journalists were sentenced to 5 and a half years in prison by a Moscow court for working with Navalny's banned organization, according to court records.
  • Prosecutors claimed the journalists created materials for Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation, labeled as extremist by Russia.
  • Supporters of the journalists criticized the trial as an intimidation tactic against the press, reflecting on the critical state of journalism in Russia.
  • A spokesperson for Reuters emphasized that there is no evidence linking the charges to the journalists' freelance work, advocating for press freedom.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™