Lawmakers, advocates want to see changes to Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

'Big beautiful bill' passes House

Legislation that President Donald Trump touted, as it makes his 2017 tax cuts permanent and advances several parts of his agenda, passed the House of Representatives.

Bill getting criticism

Some aspects of the bill have been criticized by advocates and experts, and even Republican lawmakers say they want to see certain aspects changed.

Medicaid cuts

House Speaker Mike Johnson continued defending Medicaid work requirement provisions in the bill in an interview on "Meet the Press."


Full story

A bill that makes President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cuts permanent and advances several parts of his agenda for his second term has passed the House of Representatives. Before it gets through the Senate, though, lawmakers, advocates and others want to see changes made to it.

As Straight Arrow News previously reported, if the Senate changes the version of the bill the House past, it has to be re-approved.

Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, told CNBC that the Senate bill will likely not be “that much different” overall than the House’s version, but added that he expects “a lot of debate” about the Medicaid provision.

Cuts to Medicaid in the budget bill could cause millions of people to lose coverage, according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office. It adds new rules and paperwork requirements as well.

In an interview on NBC News‘ “Meet the Press” on Sunday, June 1, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson said that 4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid “unless they choose to do so.” He argued that the bill imposes “commonsense” work requirements.

Lawmakers have seen much pushback to these cuts, though, including Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa. She received criticism when she responded to a constituent concerned about Medicaid cuts by saying, “We all are going to die” at a Friday, May 30 town hall meeting. She responded on Saturday, June 1 with a video where she sarcastically apologized for making the “incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that yes, we are all going to perish from this Earth.”

What changes do people want to see in the bill?

Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, said on CBS News’ “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Sunday, June 1 that the “math doesn’t really add up” when it comes to what Trump has called his “big, beautiful bill.”

“I think they’re asking for too much money,” Paul said. However, he added that he would vote for it if a provision raising the debt ceiling was taken out.

“In all likelihood, I can vote for what the agreement is on the rest of the bill, and it doesn’t have to be perfect to my liking,” Paul told CBS.

Meanwhile, advocates who spoke to The Hill said they welcome the chance to reform the legislation in the Senate. Education advocates said they want to change the parts of the bill that raise taxes on university endowments and terminate all but one income-driven repayment plan for student loans.

“The major takeaway is that this bill is going to make paying for college and paying off student loans more expensive and more risky for millions of students and working families with student debt,” said Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director for Student Borrower Protection Center, said to The Hill.

Another aspect that could change is the House-approved $40,000 SALT limit in the bill. The SALT deduction allows people to deduct certain state and local taxes from their federal income. This $40,000 limit could be lower once the Senate is done debating the bill, experts said to CNBC.

Even Elon Musk, who recently ended his stint as a government employee as part of the Department of Government Efficiency, criticized the bill in an interview that aired in full Sunday, June 1 on CBS News.

Musk said he was “disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, doesn’t decrease it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing.

“I said, ‘I actually thought that, when this ‘big, beautiful bill’ came along, it’d be like, everything he’s done on DOGE gets wiped out in the first year,” Musk said. adding that “I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful, but I don’t know if it could be both.”

Tags: , , , , ,

Why this story matters

Debate over a bill that would make President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent and introduce significant policy changes highlights contentious national discussions on tax policy, student loan repayment, Medicaid and federal budget priorities as it advances from the House to the Senate.

Tax policy changes

Making the 2017 tax cuts permanent is a central and controversial element that shapes federal fiscal policy and impacts government revenue structures.

Get the big picture

Behind the numbers

Various estimates from the Congressional Budget Office and independent analysts suggest that the bill would add between $3 trillion and $4 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade. The main drivers are the permanent extension of tax cuts, increased defense and border security funding and reduced but not eliminated spending on programs such as Medicaid and SNAP.

Community reaction

Local communities and advocacy groups have reacted with concern, particularly over the potential loss of Medicaid and food assistance for millions. Several articles note protests and angry exchanges at town halls, with constituents voicing fears about losing coverage and criticizing lawmakers for the perceived trade-off of cuts to social programs in exchange for tax breaks.

Policy impact

The bill would permanently extend individual tax cuts, increase military and border spending, impose stricter work requirements on Medicaid and SNAP recipients, and potentially reduce or eliminate coverage for millions. Middle-income households could see modest tax relief, while high-income earners and homeowners in high-tax states would benefit the most from expanded SALT deductions.

Bias comparison

  • Not enough coverage from media outlets on the left to provide a bias comparison.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets on the right to provide a bias comparison.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

145 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™