Lawmakers urge White House to nix est. $1.35 billion plan to kill 450,000 owls


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story


Full Story

A bipartisan group of lawmakers is urging the Trump administration to nix a plan to kill nearly half a million barred owls to save the northern spotted owl from extinction.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approved the plan in 2024 to shoot tens of thousands of birds in California, Oregon and Washington over 30 years.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

What did the letter say?

In a letter on Friday, March 7, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and 19 other U.S. lawmakers argue the plan is too expensive, saying that it will cost more than $1.3 billion.

The more than $1 billion cost cited by lawmakers was an estimate based on a $4.5 million contract awarded to a California Native American tribe in 2024 to hunt roughly 1,500 barred owls over four years.

What are supporters of the conservation plan saying?

As Straight Arrow News previously reported, proponents of the plan said scrapping the mass culling means northern spotted owls will continue to be pushed out of their habitat by larger barred owls.

Scientists consider barred owls to be the number one threat to northern spotted owls and could lead to their extinction if left unchecked.

Supporters also cite a recent study which found the cost of the effort is far lower at around $360 million compared to the more than $1 billion figure presented by lawmakers.

Why are some conservationists against the plan?

Some animal welfare advocates, however, do not believe hunting is the answer, citing moral reasons.

While some scientists have presented alternative plans to prevent the spread of barred owls into northern spotted owl territory, pointing to a successful animal control program that worked to save a rare songbird in California through habitat restoration.

How many northern spotted owls are there?

Officials said there are as few as 3,000 northern spotted owls on federal lands and they are listed as threatened under the California and federal Endangered Species Act.

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • The left uses loaded language emphasizing the cost of $3,000 per bird, implying significant taxpayer impact.
  • The center highlights lawmakers' concerns over inefficiency, emphasizing these issues without detailing costs as prominently.
  • The right presents similar content while emphasizing the ecological implications of displaced barred owls more than the financial aspect.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets on the left to provide a bias comparison.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets on the right to provide a bias comparison.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

45 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A bipartisan group of 19 lawmakers urged the Trump administration to cancel its plan to kill over 450,000 barred owls, arguing it would be 'grossly expensive' at $3,000 per bird.
  • The plan intends to remove over 2,400 barred owls this year, increasing to over 15,500 annually by 2027, to protect the smaller northern spotted owl.
  • Lawmakers estimated that the program could exceed $1.3 billion, based on previous costs for killing owls.
  • They criticized the plan as an 'inappropriate and inefficient use of U.S. Taxpayer dollars,' claiming it attempts to control nature at a great cost.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A bipartisan group of lawmakers urged the Trump administration to cancel plans to kill over 450,000 barred owls, citing high costs of $3,000 per bird and total expenses potentially exceeding $1.3 billion.
  • The lawmakers argued that this plan is an inappropriate and inefficient use of U.S. Taxpayer dollars.
  • An estimated 100,000 barred owls inhabit areas with approximately 7,100 spotted owls, which could become extinct, highlighting ecological concerns regarding their decline.
  • The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had previously approved a plan to remove barred owls, which has sparked controversy among wildlife advocates and raised questions about its effectiveness.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A bipartisan group of 19 lawmakers urged the Trump administration to stop plans to remove more than 450,000 barred owls to protect smaller owls facing extinction.
  • Federal officials estimate that 100,000 barred owls now inhabit areas with only about 7,100 spotted owls, impacting conservation efforts.
  • The plan includes removing more than 2,400 barred owls this year and ramping up to over 15,500 annually by 2027.
  • The letter to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum stated, 'This is an inappropriate and inefficient use of U.S. Taxpayer dollars,' highlighting divisions among wildlife advocates regarding killing one species to save another.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™