Lawsuit could strike down California’s new ‘Glock ban’ law


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

California handgun ban

Assembly Bill 1127 was signed by California Governor Gavin Newsom on October 10. The law bans sales or transfers by licensed dealers of handguns with a cruciform trigger bar, a component common to many semi-automatic firearms such as Glock-brand handguns, starting July 1, 2026.

Reason for restriction

According to the article, the restriction targets guns with a cruciform trigger bar because they can be easily converted to fully automatic with an auto-sear device, also known as a 'switch,' which can be purchased online or 3D printed.

Legal challenge

A lawsuit was filed in California’s Southern District court seeking to overturn the law on the grounds that it violates the Second Amendment.


Full story

California’s ban on one of the nation’s most popular handguns is facing a challenge just days after Gov. Gavin Newsom, D, signed it. Assembly Bill 1127, signed by Newsom on Friday, Oct. 10, bans the sale or transfer of handguns with a “cruciform trigger bar,” a gun part common to many semi-automatic firearms. The gun component is a central part of Glock-brand handguns.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The law specifically bans licensed gun dealers from selling or transferring the handguns if they received them after the law takes effect next July 1. Private sales are still allowed.

The reasoning for the restriction is that guns with the particular design can easily be converted to fire fully automatic with an auto-sear, commonly referred to as a “switch,” an add-on available online. The part can also be 3D printed. The accessory allows most Glock handguns to empty an extended magazine in just seconds with one trigger pull. The bill’s sponsors argue that gun manufacturers knew about the issue and refused to address the design.

Authorities say a handgun converted with a switch was used in a 2022 gang-related shooting in Sacramento that left six dead and more than a dozen wounded.

Ownership of an auto-sear is already illegal in California, as well as ownership of a fully automatic firearm in general. The switch devices are considered machine guns by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The latest bureau data show more than 4,500 switches seized in 2023.

Lawsuit

The lawsuit, filed on Monday in California’s Southern District court, seeks to nullify the law as a violation of the Second Amendment. A 2008 landmark court ruling granted broad federal protections to guns that are commonly used at the time a restriction is enacted.

“The Constitution does not allow elitist politicians to decide which constitutionally protected guns the people may own, and California doesn’t get to tell people that their rights end where Governor Newsom’s tyrannical, anti-Second Amendment politics begin,” said Firearms Policy Coalition President Brandon Combs. “Every American has a right to choose the tools they trust to defend their lives and liberty.”

Plaintiffs argue that the ban on selling or transferring the handguns leaves “no practical way to acquire them,” which is a foundational premise that’s swayed the U.S. Supreme Court in multiple high-profile firearms decisions.

FPC is joined by the National Rifle Association, the Second Amendment Foundation and local plaintiffs.

Supporters behind the law

Everytown for Gun Safety led a significant push behind the legislation, marshaling nearly 135,000 messages and over 2,400 calls to lawmakers.

“We applaud Governor Newsom and state lawmakers for putting California at the forefront of the fight against DIY machine guns, which are just as scary as they sound,” said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety on Monday.

Everytown didn’t respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit Wednesday evening.

Lawrence Banton (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Ongoing legal and policy debates over firearm regulation are highlighted by California's new law banning certain handguns, now facing a lawsuit that frames the issue as a test of Second Amendment rights and public safety concerns.

Gun regulation

California's law banning handguns with a cruciform trigger bar raises questions about legislative approaches to preventing the modification of firearms into fully automatic weapons.

Second Amendment rights

The lawsuit, supported by national firearm advocacy groups, frames the law as a potential violation of constitutional rights to own commonly used firearms.

Public safety

Supporters of the ban, such as Everytown for Gun Safety, argue that restricting easily modifiable handguns is necessary to curb gun violence, referencing incidents involving converted weapons.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.