Lululemon sues Costco over alleged knockoff athleisure products


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Lululemon files suit

Lululemon is suing Costco for allegedly selling knockoff versions of its athleisure wear, claiming trademark and design infringement.

Accusations

The lawsuit accuses Costco of misleading customers and damaging Lululemon’s brand by offering similar-looking products at a fraction of the price.

Jury trial demand

Lululemon is seeking monetary damages and a jury trial.


Full story

Lululemon is suing Costco over selling knockoff versions of its famous athleisure wear, according to Lululemon’s lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The Canadian-American athletic apparel retailer claims that Costco’s products violate Lululemon’s intellectual property rights and harm their reputation and goodwill. 

Lululemon says they have taken steps to remove these products from the market by sending cease and desist letters to companies — including to Costco — that advertise or sell knockoffs.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Brand reputation and design infringement

“Costco has unlawfully traded upon plaintiffs’ reputation, goodwill and sweat equity by selling unauthorized and unlicensed apparel employing knockoff, infringing versions of plaintiffs’ well-known trade dress and design patents (the ‘infringing products’) and to recover fully for the monetary damages and significant harm to Lululemon’s brands and reputation caused by defendant,” Lululemon’s lawsuit states.

Lululemon alleges that these Costco items infringe on their design rights to three products: ABC pants, a men’s line known for comfort and stretch; Define jackets, a fitted, athletic jacket style; and Scuba zip-ups and hoodies, which are oversized sweatshirts.

Consumer confusion alleged

Lululemon claims that Costco is violating trademark laws and misleading customers into thinking that the Costco brand Kirkland “dupes” are actually made by Lululemon itself or by the same supplier. This could confuse customers and hurt Lululemon’s brand and reputation, the athleisure company claims.

“Indeed, one of the purposes of selling ‘dupes’ is to confuse consumers at the point-of-sale and/or observers post-sale into believing that the ‘dupes’ are plaintiffs’ authentic products when they are not,” the lawsuit states.

Pricing comparison

In the lawsuit, Lululemon points out that its Scuba hoodie, which costs $118, has a very similar-looking version being sold at Costco for around $20. This drastic price difference is being used by Lululemon to support its claim that Costco is copying its designs, potentially harming its brand by offering cheap lookalikes.

A company spokesperson for Lululemon told CBS MoneyWatch, “We take the responsibility of protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights very seriously and pursue the appropriate legal action when necessary.”

Seeking damages and jury trial

Lululemon is seeking monetary damages to compensate for lost sales, brand damage, or other financial harm and demanding a jury trial.

Costco has not yet publicly commented on the lawsuit. In 2022, Lululemon reached a settlement in its lawsuit against Peloton concerning Peloton’s women’s apparel line.

Alex Delia (Deputy Managing Editor) and Drew Pittock (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , ,

Why this story matters

The lawsuit between Lululemon and Costco highlights ongoing concerns over intellectual property rights, brand protection and consumer confusion in the retail apparel industry.

Intellectual property

Lululemon's lawsuit against Costco centers on claims of design and trademark infringement, underscoring the importance of protecting original designs and intellectual property in a competitive market.

Brand reputation

According to Lululemon, the sale of similar, lower-priced products by Costco risks damaging Lululemon's reputation and the perceived value of its products.

Consumer confusion

As alleged by Lululemon, the availability of "dupes" or imitation products in Costco stores could mislead shoppers into thinking they are buying genuine Lululemon merchandise, raising legal and ethical questions about transparency in retail.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 81 media outlets

Community reaction

Many consumers have embraced the availability of lower-priced alternatives, especially amid rising living costs. According to the articles, “dupes” or lookalike products have grown popular, frequently promoted on social media platforms. Some customers reportedly seek these alternatives specifically due to affordability, while others may mistakenly believe they are purchasing genuine Lululemon products.

Context corner

The surge in “dupes” reflects a broader trend in consumer behavior, where rising inflation and economic pressures drive shoppers toward more affordable versions of premium brands. Social media has further accelerated this trend by highlighting and sharing cheaper alternatives, posing ongoing challenges for brands that invest heavily in innovation and brand identity.

Policy impact

A court decision in favor of Lululemon could set a precedent for protecting design patents and trademarks in the retail sector, potentially restricting the availability of close lookalikes and impacting the business models of discount retailers. Conversely, denial of Lululemon’s claims could embolden retailers to offer more affordable brand alternatives.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the lawsuit as a clash between corporate giants, spotlighting inflation-driven consumer demand for affordable alternatives and portraying Costco’s offerings as “unauthorized” or “knockoffs,” thereby emphasizing economic hardship and consumer protection.
  • Media outlets in the center focus on legal specifics like “confusingly similar” design parallels without adopting emotive language, offering a more procedural tone.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight member backlash against Costco, describing the retailer as “in hot water” and accusing it of “ripping people off,” while underscoring Lululemon’s strategic concerns with “soft U.S. sales” and executive warnings, reflecting a tone of skepticism toward both brands.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

81 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. Is suing Costco Wholesale Corp. for selling knockoffs of its products, claiming intellectual property infringement.
  • The lawsuit includes claims about alleged counterfeit Scuba hoodies and ABC pants sold under Costco's private label.
  • Lululemon states it previously sent cease and desist letters to Costco and is now seeking a jury trial to stop the sale of the alleged knockoffs.
  • The lawsuit highlights that many customers mistakenly believe these imitation products are authentic Lululemon items.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On June 27, Lululemon filed a lawsuit in California federal court accusing Costco of selling knockoffs of its $128 pants and other apparel.
  • After warnings failed, Lululemon sued Costco, alleging Kirkland's line mimics its designs despite cease-and-desist letters.
  • In its 49-page complaint, court documents include photos describing Costco's dupes as "confusingly similar," detailing design parallels and price differences among products like Scuba hoodies, Define jackets and ABC pants.
  • Lululemon seeks a jury trial, damages and a court order to halt Costco's sales of alleged knockoffs, aiming to recover lost profits and stop infringement.
  • Against this backdrop, rising dupes amid inflation and trade tensions led Lululemon to cut its full-year guidance citing a dynamic macroenvironment including tariffs and increased competition.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Lululemon has filed a lawsuit against Costco for allegedly selling knockoffs of its popular athletic apparel, including Scuba hoodies and ABC pants.
  • The lawsuit, filed in California, states that Lululemon sent multiple cease and desist letters to Costco before taking legal action.
  • Lululemon is demanding a jury trial and wants Costco to hand over profits earned from the alleged copies.
  • The legal action comes amid a retail slowdown for Lululemon, which reported a 1% year-over-year sales increase, falling short of analysts' expectations.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™