‘MAHA’ study under scrutiny over citations of non-existent scientific studies


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Make America Healthy Again

A report on children's health released by President Trump and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was found to contain references to scientific studies that do not exist.

Validity challenged

Public health experts say the fake information in the administration's "MAHA" report call into question its overall findings and recommendations.

Errors corrected

The White House released a corrected version of the report, which it describes as a "transformative" look at the health of American children.


Full story

The Trump administration’s recent report on children’s health issues cites a study linking screen time to sleep problems. It quotes research tying pharmaceutical advertising to increased ADHD prescriptions for children. It refers to a finding that the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to mental illness and substance abuse among children and adolescents.

However, these studies — and others cited in the “Make America Healthy Again” report — don’t actually exist. Some experts said they suspect the report, championed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., may have been created with the help of generative artificial intelligence because of a marker that appears in the report’s citations.

‘Not an evidence-based report’

The problems with the report, first reported by the online news outlet NOTUS, raise questions about the validity of the first major health initiative of the second Trump administration, according to health experts.

“This is not an evidence-based report, and for all practical purposes, it should be junked at this point,” Georges C. Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, told The Washington Post. “It cannot be used for any policymaking. It cannot even be used for any serious discussion, because you can’t believe what’s in it.”

What appears in the report?

Kennedy and President Donald Trump released the so-called MAHA report on May 22, and Trump asked Congress to appropriate $500 million to carry out its recommendations.

The report questions the necessity of some childhood vaccinations and says children’s health has been harmed by poor diet, exposure to chemicals in the environment, a lack of exercise, chronic stress and overmedication.

“The health of American children is in crisis,” the report said. “Today’s children are the sickest generation in American history in terms of chronic disease and these preventable trends continue to worsen each year, posing a threat to our nation’s health, economy and military readiness.”

Kennedy called the report a “milestone.”

“Never in American history has the federal government taken a position on public health like this,” Kennedy said in a White House social media post. “Because of President Trump’s leadership, it’s not just one cabinet secretary – it’s the entire government that is behind this. At its core, this report is a call to action for common sense.”

The White House said it will release a follow-up report in August 2025, and Kennedy pledged to announce the causes of autism and to “eliminate those exposures” by September 2025.

Non-existent studies and questions about AI

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

The Trump administration’s “Make America Healthy Again” report on children’s health contained at least seven references to scientific studies that do not exist, according to the online news outlet NOTUS.

The 72-page MAHA report cited more than 500 studies, articles and other sources. Reporting by NOTUS identified seven studies that do not exist, and The New York Times and The Washington Post found others of uncertain authenticity.

Katherine Keyes, a professor of epidemiology at Columbia University, was listed as the author of a paper on mental health and substance abuse among adolescents. However, she told the Times she had not written the paper and could not find any paper by other researchers with the same title.

“It makes me concerned about the rigor of the report,” Keyes told the Times, “if these really basic citation practices aren’t being followed.”

Errors in the report’s footnotes suggest to some experts that the administration used artificial intelligence to help produce the document. The Post found 37 footnotes that appeared multiple times, and it reported that some included the word “oaicite” attached to URLs linking to purported research studies. The “oaicite” marker indicates the use of OpenAI software.

“Frankly, that’s shoddy work,” Oren Etzioni, a professor emeritus at the University of Washington who studies AI, told the Post. “We deserve better.”

‘Formatting issues’

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt declined to say during a briefing with reporters whether artificial intelligence was used in the MAHA report.

The administration distributed an updated version of the report later on Thursday, May 29. It no longer contained references to the disputed studies. Some citations were replaced with references to articles with similar titles or with reports by the same authors as those originally listed.

In a statement, the Democratic National Committee said the Trump administration was “justifying its policy priorities with studies and sources that do not exist,” and using fake studies to support Kennedy’s “conspiracy theory-ridden agenda.”

Emily Hilliard, a spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services, said any errors in the report were minor and only involved footnotes.

Leavitt defended Kennedy and the report’s legitimacy.

“We have complete confidence in Secretary Kennedy and his team at HHS,” Leavitt said. “I understand there were some formatting issues with the MAHA report that are being addressed and the report will be updated. But it does not negate the substance of the report, which, as you know, is one of the most transformative health reports that has ever been released by the federal government and is backed on good science that has never been recognized by the federal government.”

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor), Ally Heath (Senior Digital Producer), and Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The validity of the Trump administration's "Make America Healthy Again" report on children's health has been questioned because it was apparently based, in part, on non-existent scientific studies.

Artificial intelligence questions

Experts believe the administration used generative artificial intelligence to help write the MAHA report. This may have contributed to erroneous and false citations of research studies.

Health policy

Public health experts say problems with the report suggest that it should not be the basis for changes in government policy. The report questions some childhood vaccinations and the use of medications to treat disorders such as ADHD.

Get the big picture

Context corner

The report arrives amid ongoing debates about the role of environmental, nutritional and pharmaceutical factors in public health. Historically, government health reports undergo multiple layers of vetting, and failures in citation accuracy have sparked past controversies, especially when findings influence national policy. The possible use of artificial intelligence in generating official reports is a new dynamic, raising fresh questions about research verification.

Debunking

Independent investigation by NOTUS and other news outlets confirmed that multiple studies cited in the MAHA report do not exist, a fact corroborated by cited researchers who denied authoring the works. White House officials have attributed the issue to formatting errors, but academic experts argue the pattern of mistakes is consistent with citations generated by artificial intelligence models, not mere formatting.

Do the math

The MAHA report included 522 references in its original form, with at least seven identified as non-existent. In some examples, cited research percentages and statistics were found to be unsupported or from non-existent sources, which affected the reliability of reported data. The White House has requested a $500 million funding boost from Congress for the MAHA initiative.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left sharply emphasize the MAHA report’s credibility crisis by foregrounding terms like "fake," "flawed" and "shoddy data," framing the White House’s defense as a "struggle" and highlighting RFK Jr.’s promotion of vaccine skepticism and conspiracy theories.
  • Media outlets in the center dwells more neutrally on editorial and vetting flaws, speculating AI involvement without deeply engaging with politicized claims.
  • Media outlets on the right concentrate on the White House’s evasive responses, particularly Karoline Leavitt’s handling described as “bonkers,” framing citation errors as emblematic of incompetence or deliberate misinformation, often invoking skepticism toward established medical institutions.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

211 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The White House will corrected some errors in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s report, which criticized America's food supply and healthcare system, according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
  • NOTUS revealed that at least seven studies cited in the report do not exist, with some authors denying authorship of cited articles.
  • Kennedy's report, which calls for scrutiny of childhood vaccinations, has raised concerns even among conservative think tanks, citing unsupported conclusions according to the Cato Institute.
  • Despite the errors, the White House maintains confidence in Kennedy and describes the report as a historic assessment of children's health.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The White House acknowledged errors in the ‘Make America Healthy Again’ report led by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., released last week in Washington.
  • The report contained over 500 citations, but investigations found some references did not exist, likely due to AI errors rather than mere formatting mistakes.
  • Several studies were misrepresented or missing, with specific references removed or revised, while the report calls for scrutiny of childhood vaccines and describes children as overmedicated and undernourished.
  • The White House spokesperson acknowledged formatting problems with the report and confirmed it will be revised, expressing complete trust in Kennedy and calling the findings a groundbreaking and transformative evaluation of the chronic illness affecting American children.
  • The White House requested $500 million from Congress to fund the MAHA initiative aimed at addressing chronic disease in children, with policy recommendations expected later this year despite ongoing controversies.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The White House acknowledged issues in the ‘Make America Healthy Again’ report, saying it contained false citations of studies that do not exist.
  • Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that although there were ‘formatting issues’ in the report, it would be updated, but the core substance remains valid.
  • Several authors named in the report denied their association with fictitious studies, raising concerns over misrepresentation and accuracy.
  • Doctors criticized some report suggestions, like the harmfulness of routine childhood vaccines, arguing these claims rely on misinterpretations of scientific data.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™