Man who threw sandwich at federal agents acquitted in assault trial


Summary

Dunn threw sandwich during takeover

Sean Dunn approached federal officers after President Donald Trump ordered them to patrol D.C.’s streets in an effort to reduce violent crimes.

Bondi announces firing, charges

Attorney General Pam Bondi announced she fired Dunn from his Justice Department job and filed felony assault charges against him for the incident.

Felonious assault dropped

A grand jury couldn’t indict Dunn under felonious assault, which prompted U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro to file misdemeanor assault charges.


Full story

A federal jury found the man who threw a sandwich at Border Patrol agents in Washington, D.C. not guilty of misdemeanor assault, The Associated Press reported. The verdict closed out a trial that was once for a felony and marked by an agent’s testimony of events. 

Sean C. Dunn, a former Justice Department employee, approached a group of federal agents in mid-August, called them fascists and questioned their purpose in his city. Shortly after, he threw a deli sandwich at officers, which was captured on video and quickly went viral as others protested President Donald Trump’s directive to send federal agents to the capitol city.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Attorney General Pam Bondi said his actions amounted to felonious assault. A federal jury said otherwise, clearing Dunn of felonious assault in August, and misdemeanor assault on Thursday. Dunn’s lawyers have argued the incident was a measure of protest. 

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

Federal prosecutors have dropped charges in at least 11 cases after initially charging more than 50 people with federal crimes since President Trump’s D.C. takeover.

“I’m relieved and I’m looking forward to moving on with my life,” Dunn said, according to the AP. 

After the incident, the Justice Department fired Dunn from his role as an international affairs specialist in the department’s criminal division. 

Federal prosecutors argued that Dunn knew he didn’t have a right to throw the sandwich and “crossed the line,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael DiLorenzo said in court Wednesday, according to the AP

Dunn’s case is one of many out of the D.C. federal court where people were either ruled not guilty or prosecutors dropped cases against. The surge of federal charges followed Trump’s troop deployment as residents and others protested the president’s takeover.

Agent could ‘smell’ onions

The relatively short jury trial of Dunn revealed more about agents’ actions in D.C. Federal prosecutors originally sought felony assault charges against Dunn, but a grand jury declined to indict the man under that class, so U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro refiled the charge, this time as a misdemeanor. 

Customs and Border Patrol Agent Gregory Lairmore testified that Dunn’s sandwich “exploded” when it hit his chest and he could feel the impact through his ballistic vest, The AP reported

“You could smell the onions and the mustard,” he said. 

He and other agents attempted to deescalate the situation as Dunn shouted profanities and “shame” at them. He recalled Dunn being “red-faced” and calling them “all kinds of names.”

Dunn appeared on a law enforcement officer’s body camera saying that he threw the sandwich to draw agents away from a club that was hosting a Latin Night.

Dunn’s defense attorney, Sabrina Schroff, said in court that Dunn’s colleagues passing around gifts about the incident indicated that they knew the case was “overblown” and “worthy of a joke.” 

“A footlong from Subway could not and certainly did not inflict any bodily harm,” Schroff said during closing arguments Wednesday.

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor) and Ally Heath (Senior Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal jury acquitted Sean C. Dunn, a former Justice Department employee, of misdemeanor assault after he threw a sandwich at Border Patrol agents during protests in Washington, D.C., highlighting the boundaries of protest, law enforcement response and prosecutorial discretion.

Legal boundaries of protest

The case explores the limits of lawful protest actions and clarifies that certain nonviolent acts, even if provocative, may not meet the threshold for criminal assault according to the federal jury's decision.

Prosecutorial discretion

After a grand jury declined to indict Dunn for felony assault, prosecutors refiled as a misdemeanor, revealing the role and limits of prosecutorial judgment in cases arising from protest activities.

Law enforcement and public response

The incident took place amid protests against President Donald Trump's deployment of federal agents to Washington, D.C., reflecting ongoing tension between law enforcement and demonstrators and raising questions about the handling of dissent.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 101 media outlets

Community reaction

Several sources note that local D.C. residents and some activists responded with support for Dunn, with murals and memes portraying him as a symbol of resistance against federal intervention in city policing.

Context corner

The incident and trial occurred during President Donald Trump's federal law enforcement surge in Washington D.C., which faced local opposition and was part of a broader national debate about federal authority and policing.

Oppo research

Opponents of the acquittal, including U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, argue that any act of assault against law enforcement, regardless of severity, should be prosecuted to uphold order and deter disrespect for federal officers.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the defendant as a sympathetic "Sandwich Guy" or "heroic chucker," emphasizing the "absurdity of it all" and portraying his action as a "harmless gesture" of protest against perceived federal overreach, celebrating the acquittal as "Justice with a side of chips.
  • Media outlets in the center characterized the outcome as the "latest legal rebuke of the federal intervention," while remaining factually neutral.
  • Media outlets on the right highlighted the defendant as a "Fired DOJ employee" who "hurled" the sandwich, expressing "growing concerns" about D.C. jurors' willingness to convict in cases tied to the federal surge, and viewing the verdict as a "setback for prosecutors.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

199 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Sean Dunn, a former Justice Department paralegal, was found not guilty of misdemeanor assault charges after throwing a Subway sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer during a protest against federal law enforcement in Washington, D.C.
  • The jury deliberated for several hours before acquitting Dunn, whose actions have been viewed as symbolic resistance against President Trump's law enforcement surge in the capital.
  • Initially charged with felony assault, the case was downgraded after a grand jury declined to indict Dunn, reflecting a pattern of backlash against the Justice Department's prosecutions.
  • Dunn expressed relief after the verdict, stating, 'I'm relieved and looking forward to moving on with my life.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Thursday, a Washington, D.C. Jury found Sean Dunn, former Department of Justice paralegal, not guilty of misdemeanor assault after he threw a Subway sandwich at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection agent on Aug. 10.
  • U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro's office initially sought felony charges but a Washington, D.C. Grand jury refused to indict, so prosecutors pursued a misdemeanor instead amid President Donald Trump's deployment of federal agents to Washington, D.C.
  • Defense lawyers emphasized gag gifts and visual evidence to argue that a Subway sandwich still in its wrapping and the `Felony Footlong` patch showed the throw could not cause harm.
  • Jurors deliberated for roughly 7 hours before returning the not guilty verdict, and Sean Dunn hugged his lawyers, saying he was relieved and looking forward to moving on.
  • The acquittal is another setback for prosecutors in Washington, reflecting backlash over law-enforcement surge cases and a pattern of grand juries in Washington, D.C. Refusing to indict.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Sean Charles Dunn was found not guilty of assaulting a federal agent by throwing a sandwich, with the jury deliberating for about seven hours before the verdict was reached.
  • Dunn's defense claimed the sandwich toss was a harmless protest against federal control over Washington, D.C., while prosecutors maintained it was criminal behavior.
  • A grand jury previously declined to indict Dunn on felony charges, leading to his misdemeanor prosecution.
  • Dunn expressed relief after the verdict, stating he looked forward to moving on with his life.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.