Media control or accountability? Court says Trump can ban AP: Bias Breakdown


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Press access

The Associated Press had sued the Trump administration, claiming its access was revoked in retaliation for refusing to use a particular geographic term. The court's decision upheld the administration's discretion.

Media reactions

There were opposing reactions in the media to the court's decision. Left-leaning outlets described Trump's actions as efforts to silence dissent and intimidate journalists, while right-leaning media figures defended Trump's moves and characterized legacy media as untrustworthy.

Ongoing litigation

Several legal disputes between Donald Trump and various media organizations are ongoing, including with CBS News, the Des Moines Register and its former pollster Ann Selzer, and the Pulitzer Prize Board.


Full story

A federal appeals court has ruled in favor of President Donald Trump in a case involving press access to the White House. The decision is a victory for Trump in a broader, years-long battle between the administration and mainstream media outlets.

The Associated Press sued the administration for revoking its access to the Oval Office and Air Force One. The AP claimed the move was made in retaliation for its refusal to call the “Gulf of Mexico” the “Gulf of America,” and that it infringed on its First Amendment protections.

However, the appeals court ruled that press access to certain White House areas is a “privilege,” not a right.

“The First Amendment does not control the president’s discretion in choosing with whom to speak or to whom to provide special access,” the three-judge panel wrote in its ruling. “The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted.”

Trump celebrated the ruling on Truth Social.

“Big WIN over AP today,” Trump wrote. “They refused to state the facts or the Truth on the GULF OF AMERICA. FAKE NEWS!!!”

In April, Judge Trevor McFadden ordered the White House to allow the AP into spaces made available to other members of the White House press pool. In his ruling, McFadden wrote that the AP had been wrongly singled out. 

Media reacts: Control or accountability?

The appeals court decision has triggered contrasting reactions in the press, following long-standing ideological lines.

Left-leaning outlets called Trump’s initial removal of the AP from the press pool a troubling move to silence dissent and intimidate journalists.

“He wants nothing short of complete obedience and for everyone to say they love him, praise him, and tell him he’s the best president ever,” former MSNBC host Joy Reid said about Trump and the media.

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow described Trump’s strategy as part of the “[Hungarian Prime Minister] Viktor Orbán playbook” to weaken independent journalism, saying Trump wants to use “the power of government to eliminate independent, credible, professional journalism.“

Conversely, right-leaning media defended Trump’s ban on the AP and suggested he is right to take action against legacy media, calling it “dead” due to a lack of trust.

“Legacy media is dead,” Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld said. “Put a tag on their toe, call Quincy, shove the body in a fridge because the corpse is starting to reek.”

“President Trump was right about the fake news press,” NewsMax host Chris Salcedo said. “President Trump has been telling the truth about the majority of the biased press for years now.”

Public trust in media low, and partisan

Americans’ trust in the media remains at historic lows. Gallup’s latest polling shows just 31% of the public has a great deal or a fair amount of trust in news media. Pew Research also reports stark partisan divides: Democrats are far more likely to trust national media outlets than Republicans.

The Pew Study also found that in today’s media environment, consumers often gravitate toward outlets that match their political views. Most major networks — including ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR and PBS — are rated as having a left-leaning bias by media watchdogs. The same is true of large publications such as The New York Times, The Washington Post and the AP.

Media litigation that’s far from over

The AP case is just one of several legal showdowns between Trump and media organizations:

  • ABC News paid a $15 million settlement to Trump last year in a defamation lawsuit, after anchor George Stephanopoulos falsely stated Trump had been found liable for rape.
  • Trump is suing the Des Moines Register and pollster Ann Selzer, claiming fraud over a missed poll result by 16 points just days before the 2024 election. This case is still playing out in federal court.
  • Trump is suing the Pulitzer Prize Board, seeking to revoke awards given to The New York Times and The Washington Post for their reporting on alleged Trump-Russia collusion. A judge ruled last week that the case can proceed after the Board attempted to put the case on pause.
  • NPR is suing Trump in response to an executive order freezing federal funding to public broadcasters. This litigation is also ongoing.

The media choosing a side and narrative

The underlying facts in these legal battles remain consistent — but how they’re framed depends heavily on the outlet. Left-leaning media describe Trump’s litigation as retribution and suppression of dissent. Right-leaning media present it as long-overdue accountability for a biased press corps.

Ian Kennedy (Lead Video Editor), Ali Caldwell (Motion Graphics Designer), Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor), Alex Delia (Deputy Managing Editor), and Drew Pittock (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

This story underscores the ongoing tension between the media and government over press freedoms and executive authority, marking the latest legal clash between the Trump administration and a press corps with which it has long been at odds.

Press access rights

The appeals court clarified that access to the White House — particularly to spaces like the Oval Office — is a privilege, not a constitutional right, giving the president broad discretion over which journalists or outlets are granted entry.

Media and government conflict

Ongoing legal disputes and contrasting reactions highlight the adversarial and politicized relationship between major news organizations and President Donald Trump, shaping public narratives about press freedom and accountability.

Public trust in media

Low and partisan public trust in media, as reported by Gallup and Pew Research, underscores how disputes like this affect public perception of both journalistic credibility and political leadership.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 201 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The Associated Press notes it provides news reporting to about 4 billion people daily. Presidential press pool access allows only approximately 1% of credentialed White House journalists into the most restricted spaces like the Oval Office and Air Force One. Recent changes moved AP and similar outlets into a larger rotation pool of about 30 print and wire services.

Debunking

Some claims suggest that the AP is being uniquely targeted, but as clarified by White House statements and courtroom documents, numerous journalists have never received access to privileged spaces such as the Oval Office or Air Force One. The court’s decision only temporarily allows exclusion while litigation proceeds and does not grant a blanket ban to all noncompliant outlets.

Global impact

The renaming of the “Gulf of Mexico” to “Gulf of America” by the Trump administration did not gain international recognition, leading global organizations such as the AP to retain the traditional name to serve their international audience. The restriction on AP coverage has an international impact, given the outlet’s extensive global syndication network.

History lesson

Exclusion of journalists from White House events is not unprecedented. Past administrations have occasionally restricted access to individual reporters or outlets, but typically not for reasons tied directly to editorial content or naming conventions. Legal challenges to such exclusions often cite First Amendment grounds, as in the case of Sam Donaldson and others.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left highlight the appeals court ruling as a retaliatory "ban" that "chips away" at First Amendment protections, portraying Trump’s move as a threat to press freedom and constitutional rights, often framing the decision with emotionally charged terms like "discriminatory" and emphasizing the AP's principled stand against government-imposed narrative shifts.
  • Media outlets in the center maintain a measured tone, outlining the legal dispute and dissent without emotive framing.
  • Media outlets on the right frame the court’s decision as a “big win” affirming presidential authority over "restricted spaces," deploying assertive language such as “reinstates” and stressing the legal legitimacy of viewpoint-based exclusions as routine and justified for nonpublic fora.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

201 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal appeals court ruled 2-1 that the Trump administration can exclude the Associated Press from areas like the Oval Office and Air Force One for now, reversing a previous lower court decision deemed unconstitutional.
  • Judges Gregory Katsas and Neomi Rao stated that the White House has discretion over which journalists to admit based on viewpoint.
  • The Associated Press has claimed that this restriction violates its First Amendment rights, specifically related to its refusal to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America.
  • The Associated Press expressed disappointment in the ruling and is reviewing options following the decision regarding its access to presidential spaces.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A federal appeals court ruled that President Donald Trump’s White House can restrict the Associated Press' access to the Oval Office, Air Force One and Mar-a-Lago for now.
  • Judges Neomi Rao and Gregory Katsas stated that these spaces are not First Amendment forums for private speech and discussion.
  • The Associated Press sued on First Amendment grounds after a lower court ruling ordered access to these spaces.
  • Rao noted that the lower court’s ruling could interfere with the president’s control over his workspaces.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A U.S. appeals court allowed President Donald Trump to bar the Associated Press from some White House events for now, reversing a lower court ruling that required access for AP journalists.
  • The AP had sued after the White House denied access for using the name "Gulf of Mexico" instead of "Gulf of America," which Trump mandated.
  • Judge Neomi Rao stated that the White House will likely win its case since these spaces are not First Amendment fora, and the administration has discretion over access.
  • The AP expressed disappointment with the ruling and is exploring its options, as the incident raises First Amendment questions regarding press freedom.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

  • The AP will have limited access to the Oval Office, Air Force One after a federal judge denied a request to reinstate its press privileges.
    Reuters
    Politics
    Feb 25

    White House can continue restricting AP’s press privileges, judge rules

    Full Story The Associated Press will continue to face limited access to the Oval Office and Air Force One after a federal judge denied the AP’s request for an emergency order to reinstate its press privileges. The AP filed a lawsuit seeking to have its access restored after the White House restricted the organization from…

  • AP is suing members of Trump's administration for blocking its reporters after it refused to use the term "Gulf of America."
    Getty Images
    Politics
    Feb 21

    AP sues Trump to force White House access following ‘Gulf of America’ row

    The Associated Press (AP) is suing members of President Donald Trump’s administration. The AP’s reporters were blocked from accessing the White House for refusing to use the “Gulf of America” designation ordered by the president. Lawyers for AP filed the suit in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., a little more than a week after…

  • The Associated Press was restricted on Feb. 11 after a dispute over President Trump’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.
    AP Images
    Politics
    Feb 21

    Fox News, Newsmax among 40 outlets asking Trump to reinstate AP access

    Full Story More than 40 news organizations, including Fox News and Newsmax, have sent a joint letter to the White House requesting that the Trump administration reinstate The Associated Press’ press privileges. The AP’s access was restricted on Feb. 11 following a dispute over President Donald Trump’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the…

  • The White House allegedly blocked an Associated Press reporter from an event at the Oval Office on Tuesday, Feb. 11, over the news agency's style policy on the use of "Gulf of America."
    Getty Images
    Politics
    Feb 12

    AP says White House blocked reporter over Gulf of America policy

    The White House allegedly blocked an Associated Press reporter from an event at the Oval Office on Tuesday, Feb. 11, over the news agency’s style policy on using “Gulf of America.” Before President Donald Trump’s order changed the body of water’s name, it was the “Gulf of Mexico” in the U.S.  The Associated Press released…

Timeline

  • The AP will have limited access to the Oval Office, Air Force One after a federal judge denied a request to reinstate its press privileges.
    Reuters
    Politics
    Feb 25

    White House can continue restricting AP’s press privileges, judge rules

    Full Story The Associated Press will continue to face limited access to the Oval Office and Air Force One after a federal judge denied the AP’s request for an emergency order to reinstate its press privileges. The AP filed a lawsuit seeking to have its access restored after the White House restricted the organization from…

  • AP is suing members of Trump's administration for blocking its reporters after it refused to use the term "Gulf of America."
    Getty Images
    Politics
    Feb 21

    AP sues Trump to force White House access following ‘Gulf of America’ row

    The Associated Press (AP) is suing members of President Donald Trump’s administration. The AP’s reporters were blocked from accessing the White House for refusing to use the “Gulf of America” designation ordered by the president. Lawyers for AP filed the suit in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., a little more than a week after…

  • The Associated Press was restricted on Feb. 11 after a dispute over President Trump’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.
    AP Images
    Politics
    Feb 21

    Fox News, Newsmax among 40 outlets asking Trump to reinstate AP access

    Full Story More than 40 news organizations, including Fox News and Newsmax, have sent a joint letter to the White House requesting that the Trump administration reinstate The Associated Press’ press privileges. The AP’s access was restricted on Feb. 11 following a dispute over President Donald Trump’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the…

  • The White House allegedly blocked an Associated Press reporter from an event at the Oval Office on Tuesday, Feb. 11, over the news agency's style policy on the use of "Gulf of America."
    Getty Images
    Politics
    Feb 12

    AP says White House blocked reporter over Gulf of America policy

    The White House allegedly blocked an Associated Press reporter from an event at the Oval Office on Tuesday, Feb. 11, over the news agency’s style policy on using “Gulf of America.” Before President Donald Trump’s order changed the body of water’s name, it was the “Gulf of Mexico” in the U.S.  The Associated Press released…