Meta adds facial recognition code for its smart glasses without telling anyone


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Meta’s AI app now includes facial recognition code for its smart glasses, despite the company’s previous assurances that it had not decided whether to introduce the technology.

An analysis of the company’s AI app by Wired uncovered “an unreleased face-recognition system embedded in Meta’s smart glasses platform” designed to identify people whose biometric data has been stored on the wearers’ phone.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™

Point phone camera here

When Meta’s smart glasses detect someone known to the wearer, a notification will appear on the wearer’s phone. All other faces are cropped, indexed and saved to a “pending” folder.

The feature, known internally at Meta as “NameTag,” was quietly added to the AI app in multiple updates that appear to have begun as early as January. Meta said in April that the company was still “thinking through” the decision and would not move forward without first taking “a very thoughtful approach.”

The Meta AI app has been downloaded more than 50 million times. In a statement to Wired, Meta spokesperson Ryan Daniels pushed back on the outlet’s findings.

“Regardless of any sensational reporting, the facts are simple: We’ve said before we’re exploring these types of features, and what you’re seeing is just evidence of that exploration. Nothing has shipped to consumers and no final decision has been made on what to do here, if anything. If we do decide to roll something out, we will take a thoughtful approach and do so with full transparency. One decision we can be clear about — we are not building a central face database.”

Ryan Daniels, Meta spokesperson

Andy Stone, Meta’s vice president of communication, likewise suggested in a post to X that the company’s inclusion of the code to its AI app was merely exploratory. Andrew Bosworth, Meta’s chief technology officer, also described Wired’s reporting as “incredibly misleading” and “absolutely dishonest.”

A leaked internal memo from May of last year, however, showed that Meta suggested introducing facial recognition to its smart glasses during a period when civil society groups would be too distracted to push back.

Civil liberties concerns

A security researcher known online as Buchodi, who reviewed Wired’s findings, said the facial recognition feature appears near complete.

“The main components of a face-recognition feature are already in Meta’s companion app,” Buchodi said. “Not many pieces stand between this and a working feature.”

In April, more than 70 civil liberties groups called on Meta to scrap its plans to bring facial recognition to its smart glasses over fears of abuse.

Meta deployed a similar feature to Facebook in 2010 that used facial recognition to suggest tags for people who appeared in users’ photos. The feature proved controversial, and after collecting more than a billion face prints, Facebook ended the feature in 2021. 

Facebook ultimately paid out $2 billion to settle class-action lawsuits that argued the company had unlawfully collected users’ facial data.


Round out your reading

Tags: ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Facial recognition code found in a widely downloaded app raises immediate questions about whether Meta is preparing to introduce the feature, despite assurances it had yet to decide.

Bystanders face passive data capture

According to Wired's analysis, faces of unrecognized individuals seen by the glasses are cropped, indexed and saved to a "pending" folder without those people's consent or awareness.

App already widely installed

The Meta AI app containing the code has been downloaded more than 50 million times, meaning the software is already present on tens of millions of devices.

Prior legal exposure on record

Facebook previously paid $2 billion to settle class-action lawsuits over unlawful facial data collection, establishing a documented precedent for legal and financial consequences tied to similar Meta features.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 14 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The Meta AI app has been downloaded over 50 million times. Meta previously paid $650 million to settle a biometric data lawsuit in Illinois and $1.4 billion to settle a separate case in Texas. EssilorLuxottica sold more than 7 million smart glasses units in 2025.

Community reaction

Privacy advocates, including the ACLU and Fight for the Future, sent a letter to Meta urging the company to halt and disavow plans to add facial recognition to its smart glasses. Security researcher Cooper Quintin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation stated Meta appears to have "created the capacity to turn their customers into a distributed surveillance machine."

Context corner

Meta shut down Facebook's facial recognition photo-tagging system in 2021 and deleted over a billion faceprints amid privacy backlash. The company's renewed interest in the technology echoes the controversy that contributed to the failure of Google Glass in the early 2010s.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Sources

  1. Wired

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

14 total sources

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

  • No coverage from Lean Right sources 0 sources
  • No coverage from Right sources 0 sources
  • No coverage from Far Right sources 0 sources

Powered by Ground News™

Sources

  1. Wired